Activity-dependent regulation of synaptic AMPA receptor composition and abundance by beta3 integrins

Lorenzo A Cingolani, Agnes Thalhammer, Lily M Y Yu, Myriam Catalano, Timothy Ramos, Michael A Colicos, Yukiko Goda, Lorenzo A Cingolani, Agnes Thalhammer, Lily M Y Yu, Myriam Catalano, Timothy Ramos, Michael A Colicos, Yukiko Goda

Abstract

At synapses, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) provide the molecular framework for coordinating signaling events across the synaptic cleft. Among synaptic CAMs, the integrins, receptors for extracellular matrix proteins and counterreceptors on adjacent cells, are implicated in synapse maturation and plasticity and memory formation. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of integrin action at central synapses. Here, we report that postsynaptic beta3 integrins control synaptic strength by regulating AMPA receptors (AMPARs) in a subunit-specific manner. Pharmacological perturbation targeting beta3 integrins promotes endocytosis of GluR2-containing AMPARs via Rap1 signaling, and expression of beta3 integrins produces robust changes in the abundance and composition of synaptic AMPARs without affecting dendritic spine structure. Importantly, homeostatic synaptic scaling induced by activity deprivation elevates surface expression of beta3 integrins, and in turn, beta3 integrins are required for synaptic scaling. Our findings demonstrate a key role for integrins in the feedback regulation of excitatory synaptic strength.

Figures

Fig 1. RGD Peptides Reduce mEPSC Amplitude
Fig 1. RGD Peptides Reduce mEPSC Amplitude
(A) Overlay of mEPSC traces recorded from a hippocampal pyramidal neuron of rat primary cultures over a 5 min control period (−), the last 5 of 10 min bath application of echistatin (100 nM), and the last 5 of 10 min wash. Grey traces are aligned original mEPSCs and black traces represent the population average. (B) Cumulative distribution plot of mEPSC amplitudes from the experiment shown in A (p

Fig 2. Echistatin-Mediated Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude…

Fig 2. Echistatin-Mediated Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude Requires Elevation of Intracellular Ca 2+

(A) mEPSC population…

Fig 2. Echistatin-Mediated Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude Requires Elevation of Intracellular Ca2+
(A) mEPSC population averages before (−) and after echistatin application (100 nM), and (B) cumulative distributions of mEPSC amplitudes from representative neurons where echistatin was applied at least 5 min after treatments with latrunculin A (LatA, top) or ifenprodil (bottom), or applied in the presence of BAPTA in the intracellular solution (BAPTApost, middle). (C) Summary of the echistatin effects on mEPSC amplitude in the presence of blockers or Ca2+ chelators: LatA (20 μM; *p=0.04 relative to baseline, n=4), D-APV (50 μM; n=6), ifenprodil (3 μM; n=6), BAPTA-AM (100 μM, n=6), BAPTApost (37.5–50 mM, n=6). Echistatin does not reduce mEPSC amplitude in the presence of Ca2+ chelators or NMDAR blockers. (D) Traces of evoked autaptic AMPAR and NMDAR synaptic currents from a representative experiment before (baseline) and after echistatin application (100 nM). The unclamped Na+ spikes have been blanked for clarity. (E) Time courses of the echistatin effect on peak AMPAR current (left, n=5, p=0.03) and on NMDAR charge transfer (right, n=6, p=0.53; open triangles: responses used to evaluate statistical significance). Echistatin selectively reduces the AMPAR current.

Fig 3. Integrins Regulate GluR2 Endocytosis

(A)…

Fig 3. Integrins Regulate GluR2 Endocytosis

(A) Neurons were loaded with D15 (left) or a…

Fig 3. Integrins Regulate GluR2 Endocytosis
(A) Neurons were loaded with D15 (left) or a scrambled S15 peptide (right) for at least 10 min prior to the baseline period. mEPSC population averages are from representative neurons during 5 min baseline (−) and the last 5 of 10 min application of echistatin (100 nM). (B) Time course of mEPSC amplitudes from neurons loaded with GTPγS (0.5 mM; n=6), or D15 or S15 peptides (0.25–2 mM; D15, n=5; D15+echistatin, n=6; S15+echistatin, n=6). Each data point represents the average mEPSC amplitude over 100 s interval normalized to the first 100 s (*p=0.03, **psurface)/(mean intensitysurface + mean intensityinternalized). ***p=0.00002. Echistatin specifically increases GluR2 endocytosis.

Fig 4. Echistatin-Mediated Activation of Rap1 Is…

Fig 4. Echistatin-Mediated Activation of Rap1 Is Required for mEPSC Amplitude Decrease

(A) Pulldown with…

Fig 4. Echistatin-Mediated Activation of Rap1 Is Required for mEPSC Amplitude Decrease
(A) Pulldown with GST-RalGDS-RBD from mock- (Untreat) and echistatin-treated (Echi, 300 nM, 10 min at 37°C) culture lysates (500 μg each) reveals activation of endogenous Rap1 by echistatin (top right). Comparable amounts of Rap1 were detected from the respective lysates (20 μg per lane, bottom right). Top left, lysates were treated with GDP (1 mM; negative control) or GTPγS (0.1 mM; positive control). Exposure times are different for the three panels shown. Similar results were obtained in four independent experiments. (B) mEPSC population averages from representative neurons expressing Rap1DN (top) or Rap2DN (bottom), before (−) and after echistatin application (100 nM). Basal mEPSC amplitude is not significantly different between Rap1DN and Rap2DN transfected neurons (30.6 ± 3.1 pA vs. 27.5 ± 2.2 pA, respectively; n=6–8, p=0.44). (C) Summary of experiments as in B shown pairwise for individual cells and as bar graph for the average cell population (**p=0.002). Echistatin does not reduce mEPSC amplitudes under conditions that prevent Rap1 activation.

Fig 5. Postsynaptic Expression of β3 Integrins…

Fig 5. Postsynaptic Expression of β3 Integrins Alters mEPSC Amplitude

(A) Sample mEPSCs and (B)…

Fig 5. Postsynaptic Expression of β3 Integrins Alters mEPSC Amplitude
(A) Sample mEPSCs and (B) histograms of mEPSC amplitudes from representative neurons overexpressing WTβ3 and mRFP (WTβ3, top), mRFP (control, middle), or CTβ3 and mRFP (CTβ3, bottom). (C) Summary of group data from experiments as in A. WTβ3 increases and CTβ3 decreases mEPSC amplitudes. (D) Images of dendrites from pyramidal neurons overexpressing WTβ3 and GFP (WTβ3, top), GFP (control, middle), or CTβ3 and GFP (CTβ3, bottom). Synapsin (red) was used as a presynaptic marker. Scale bar is 4 μm. (E) Summary of spine measurements. None of the differences were statistically significant (n=19 cells for control and WTβ3; n=20 for CTβ3 and CTβ1).

Fig 6. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Affect AMPAR…

Fig 6. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Affect AMPAR Subunit Composition

(A) mEPSC population averages from representative…

Fig 6. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Affect AMPAR Subunit Composition
(A) mEPSC population averages from representative neurons overexpressing WTβ3 and mRFP (WTβ3, left), mRFP (Control, middle), or CTβ3 and mRFP (CTβ3, right), during 5 min baseline (−) and the last 5 of 10 min application of the GluR2-lacking AMPAR blocker PhTx (10 μM). (B) Representative images of GluR1 (red) and GluR2 (green) surface labeling for neurons transfected with WTβ3 and GFP (WTβ3, left), GFP (Control, middle), or CTβ3 and GFP (CTβ3, right). GluR1 and GluR2 were stained with Cy3- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively. GFP fluorescence is not shown. Scale bars are 30 and 5 μm. (C) Agonist-evoked AMPAR I-V relationships from untransfected neurons (middle), and neurons overexpressing WTβ3 (left) or CTβ3 (right). Recordings were performed in outside-out somatic patches in response to a voltage-ramp from +60 to −90 mV delivered over 3 s. Currents were elicited by bath application of kainate (100 μM) and blocked by SYM 2206 (Sym; 25–50 μM). (D) Summary of the effects of PhTx on mEPSC amplitudes. The reduction of mEPSC amplitudes is shown relative to baseline (n=6 for each condition, **p=0.01 relative to baseline). Only mEPSCs recorded from CTβ3-expressing neurons are reduced by PhTx. (E) Summary of the GluR1 and GluR2 surface levels for experiments as in (B). Fluorescence intensity was quantified on the full dendritic arbor (n=27, 23, and 26 images for WTβ3, control, and CTβ3, respectively; *p=0.02 relative to control). (F) Summary of I-V rectification indices (−I−60/I+40) from recordings as in (C) (WTβ3, n=5; control, n=8; CTβ3, n=6; *p = 0.04 relative to control). WTβ3 expression decreases and CTβ3 expression increases the rectification of agonist-evoked AMPAR currents. (G) Time course of mEPSC amplitudes from untransfected neurons (Control), and neurons overexpressing WTβ3 or CTβ3, using intracellular solutions supplemented with pep2m or pep4c peptides (150 μM; Control+pep2m, n=4; CTβ3+pep2m, n=6; WTβ3+pep2m, n=6; WTβ3+pep4c, n=4). Each data point represents the average mEPSC amplitude over 100 s interval normalized to the first 100 s (*p=0.02 and **p<0.007). Only mEPSCs recorded from WTβ3 neurons are decreased by pep2m.

Fig 7. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Mediate the…

Fig 7. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Mediate the Echistatin-Induced Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude

(A) Left, representative…

Fig 7. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Mediate the Echistatin-Induced Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude
(A) Left, representative images of GluR1 (red) and GluR2 (green) surface labeling for hippocampal pyramidal neurons from β3−/− and β3+/− mouse primary cultures. Scale bar is 30 μm. Right, summary of the surface levels of GluR1 and GluR2 (n=29, 24, and 16 images for β3−/−, β3+/−, and β3+/+, respectively). (B) Left, sample traces of mEPSC recordings from hippocampal pyramidal neurons of β3−/− (top) and β3+/− (bottom) mouse primary cultures. Right, summary of group data from experiments as on the left but also including recordings from β3+/+ mouse cultures (average amplitude: −30.4.6±3.8 pA for β3−/− [n=21], −28.7±1.8 for β3+/− [n=16], and −28.4±2.3 pA for β3+/+ [n=13]). None of the differences were statistically significant. (C) Left, mEPSC population averages of a hippocampal pyramidal neuron from β3−/−mouse primary cultures before (left trace) and after (right trace) echistatin application (100 nM). Middle, cumulative distribution of mEPSC amplitudes for the experiment shown on the left. Right, summary for individual cells shown pairwise and for the average cell population shown as bar graph. (D) As in C but for hippocampal pyramidal neurons from β3+/− mouse primary cultures. **p=0.009. (E) As in C but for β3−/− hippocampal pyramidal neurons transfected with WT β3. **p=0.01.

Fig 8. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins are Required…

Fig 8. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins are Required for Synaptic Scaling

(A) Surface labeling of endogenous…

Fig 8. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins are Required for Synaptic Scaling
(A) Surface labeling of endogenous β3 (top) and β1 (bottom) integrins for untreated (middle) and bicuculline- (20 μM, 48 h; left) or TTX-treated (1 μM, 48 h; right) hippocampal cultures. Scale bars are 30 and 10 μm. (B) Summary of the effects of 48 h bicuculline or TTX treatments on the surface expression of GluR2 and β1 and β3 integrins (bicuculline, β3, n=28 images; TTX, β3, n=65; bicuculline, β1, n=30; TTX, β1, n=30; bicuculline, GluR2, n=16; TTX, GluR2, n=18; *p=0.03, **p=0.006, ***p−/− and β3+/− mouse primary cultures incubated with (red) or without (black) TTX (1 μM, 48 h; β3−/−, n=21; β3−/−+TTX, n=21; β3+/−, n=16; β3+/−+TTX, n=18; p=0.008 between β3+/− and β3+/− +TTX). Insets, mEPSC population averages from representative experiments. Scale bars are 4 ms and 10 pA. (H) As in G but for CA1 pyramidal neurons of mouse hippocampal slice cultures (β3−/−, n=18; β3−/−+TTX, n=19; β3+/−, n=18; β3+/−+TTX, n=18; p=0.000003 between β3+/− and β3+/−+TTX). Scale bars for insets are 8 ms and 5 pA.
All figures (8)
Fig 2. Echistatin-Mediated Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude…
Fig 2. Echistatin-Mediated Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude Requires Elevation of Intracellular Ca2+
(A) mEPSC population averages before (−) and after echistatin application (100 nM), and (B) cumulative distributions of mEPSC amplitudes from representative neurons where echistatin was applied at least 5 min after treatments with latrunculin A (LatA, top) or ifenprodil (bottom), or applied in the presence of BAPTA in the intracellular solution (BAPTApost, middle). (C) Summary of the echistatin effects on mEPSC amplitude in the presence of blockers or Ca2+ chelators: LatA (20 μM; *p=0.04 relative to baseline, n=4), D-APV (50 μM; n=6), ifenprodil (3 μM; n=6), BAPTA-AM (100 μM, n=6), BAPTApost (37.5–50 mM, n=6). Echistatin does not reduce mEPSC amplitude in the presence of Ca2+ chelators or NMDAR blockers. (D) Traces of evoked autaptic AMPAR and NMDAR synaptic currents from a representative experiment before (baseline) and after echistatin application (100 nM). The unclamped Na+ spikes have been blanked for clarity. (E) Time courses of the echistatin effect on peak AMPAR current (left, n=5, p=0.03) and on NMDAR charge transfer (right, n=6, p=0.53; open triangles: responses used to evaluate statistical significance). Echistatin selectively reduces the AMPAR current.
Fig 3. Integrins Regulate GluR2 Endocytosis
Fig 3. Integrins Regulate GluR2 Endocytosis
(A) Neurons were loaded with D15 (left) or a scrambled S15 peptide (right) for at least 10 min prior to the baseline period. mEPSC population averages are from representative neurons during 5 min baseline (−) and the last 5 of 10 min application of echistatin (100 nM). (B) Time course of mEPSC amplitudes from neurons loaded with GTPγS (0.5 mM; n=6), or D15 or S15 peptides (0.25–2 mM; D15, n=5; D15+echistatin, n=6; S15+echistatin, n=6). Each data point represents the average mEPSC amplitude over 100 s interval normalized to the first 100 s (*p=0.03, **psurface)/(mean intensitysurface + mean intensityinternalized). ***p=0.00002. Echistatin specifically increases GluR2 endocytosis.
Fig 4. Echistatin-Mediated Activation of Rap1 Is…
Fig 4. Echistatin-Mediated Activation of Rap1 Is Required for mEPSC Amplitude Decrease
(A) Pulldown with GST-RalGDS-RBD from mock- (Untreat) and echistatin-treated (Echi, 300 nM, 10 min at 37°C) culture lysates (500 μg each) reveals activation of endogenous Rap1 by echistatin (top right). Comparable amounts of Rap1 were detected from the respective lysates (20 μg per lane, bottom right). Top left, lysates were treated with GDP (1 mM; negative control) or GTPγS (0.1 mM; positive control). Exposure times are different for the three panels shown. Similar results were obtained in four independent experiments. (B) mEPSC population averages from representative neurons expressing Rap1DN (top) or Rap2DN (bottom), before (−) and after echistatin application (100 nM). Basal mEPSC amplitude is not significantly different between Rap1DN and Rap2DN transfected neurons (30.6 ± 3.1 pA vs. 27.5 ± 2.2 pA, respectively; n=6–8, p=0.44). (C) Summary of experiments as in B shown pairwise for individual cells and as bar graph for the average cell population (**p=0.002). Echistatin does not reduce mEPSC amplitudes under conditions that prevent Rap1 activation.
Fig 5. Postsynaptic Expression of β3 Integrins…
Fig 5. Postsynaptic Expression of β3 Integrins Alters mEPSC Amplitude
(A) Sample mEPSCs and (B) histograms of mEPSC amplitudes from representative neurons overexpressing WTβ3 and mRFP (WTβ3, top), mRFP (control, middle), or CTβ3 and mRFP (CTβ3, bottom). (C) Summary of group data from experiments as in A. WTβ3 increases and CTβ3 decreases mEPSC amplitudes. (D) Images of dendrites from pyramidal neurons overexpressing WTβ3 and GFP (WTβ3, top), GFP (control, middle), or CTβ3 and GFP (CTβ3, bottom). Synapsin (red) was used as a presynaptic marker. Scale bar is 4 μm. (E) Summary of spine measurements. None of the differences were statistically significant (n=19 cells for control and WTβ3; n=20 for CTβ3 and CTβ1).
Fig 6. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Affect AMPAR…
Fig 6. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Affect AMPAR Subunit Composition
(A) mEPSC population averages from representative neurons overexpressing WTβ3 and mRFP (WTβ3, left), mRFP (Control, middle), or CTβ3 and mRFP (CTβ3, right), during 5 min baseline (−) and the last 5 of 10 min application of the GluR2-lacking AMPAR blocker PhTx (10 μM). (B) Representative images of GluR1 (red) and GluR2 (green) surface labeling for neurons transfected with WTβ3 and GFP (WTβ3, left), GFP (Control, middle), or CTβ3 and GFP (CTβ3, right). GluR1 and GluR2 were stained with Cy3- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively. GFP fluorescence is not shown. Scale bars are 30 and 5 μm. (C) Agonist-evoked AMPAR I-V relationships from untransfected neurons (middle), and neurons overexpressing WTβ3 (left) or CTβ3 (right). Recordings were performed in outside-out somatic patches in response to a voltage-ramp from +60 to −90 mV delivered over 3 s. Currents were elicited by bath application of kainate (100 μM) and blocked by SYM 2206 (Sym; 25–50 μM). (D) Summary of the effects of PhTx on mEPSC amplitudes. The reduction of mEPSC amplitudes is shown relative to baseline (n=6 for each condition, **p=0.01 relative to baseline). Only mEPSCs recorded from CTβ3-expressing neurons are reduced by PhTx. (E) Summary of the GluR1 and GluR2 surface levels for experiments as in (B). Fluorescence intensity was quantified on the full dendritic arbor (n=27, 23, and 26 images for WTβ3, control, and CTβ3, respectively; *p=0.02 relative to control). (F) Summary of I-V rectification indices (−I−60/I+40) from recordings as in (C) (WTβ3, n=5; control, n=8; CTβ3, n=6; *p = 0.04 relative to control). WTβ3 expression decreases and CTβ3 expression increases the rectification of agonist-evoked AMPAR currents. (G) Time course of mEPSC amplitudes from untransfected neurons (Control), and neurons overexpressing WTβ3 or CTβ3, using intracellular solutions supplemented with pep2m or pep4c peptides (150 μM; Control+pep2m, n=4; CTβ3+pep2m, n=6; WTβ3+pep2m, n=6; WTβ3+pep4c, n=4). Each data point represents the average mEPSC amplitude over 100 s interval normalized to the first 100 s (*p=0.02 and **p<0.007). Only mEPSCs recorded from WTβ3 neurons are decreased by pep2m.
Fig 7. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Mediate the…
Fig 7. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins Mediate the Echistatin-Induced Reduction in mEPSC Amplitude
(A) Left, representative images of GluR1 (red) and GluR2 (green) surface labeling for hippocampal pyramidal neurons from β3−/− and β3+/− mouse primary cultures. Scale bar is 30 μm. Right, summary of the surface levels of GluR1 and GluR2 (n=29, 24, and 16 images for β3−/−, β3+/−, and β3+/+, respectively). (B) Left, sample traces of mEPSC recordings from hippocampal pyramidal neurons of β3−/− (top) and β3+/− (bottom) mouse primary cultures. Right, summary of group data from experiments as on the left but also including recordings from β3+/+ mouse cultures (average amplitude: −30.4.6±3.8 pA for β3−/− [n=21], −28.7±1.8 for β3+/− [n=16], and −28.4±2.3 pA for β3+/+ [n=13]). None of the differences were statistically significant. (C) Left, mEPSC population averages of a hippocampal pyramidal neuron from β3−/−mouse primary cultures before (left trace) and after (right trace) echistatin application (100 nM). Middle, cumulative distribution of mEPSC amplitudes for the experiment shown on the left. Right, summary for individual cells shown pairwise and for the average cell population shown as bar graph. (D) As in C but for hippocampal pyramidal neurons from β3+/− mouse primary cultures. **p=0.009. (E) As in C but for β3−/− hippocampal pyramidal neurons transfected with WT β3. **p=0.01.
Fig 8. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins are Required…
Fig 8. Postsynaptic β3 Integrins are Required for Synaptic Scaling
(A) Surface labeling of endogenous β3 (top) and β1 (bottom) integrins for untreated (middle) and bicuculline- (20 μM, 48 h; left) or TTX-treated (1 μM, 48 h; right) hippocampal cultures. Scale bars are 30 and 10 μm. (B) Summary of the effects of 48 h bicuculline or TTX treatments on the surface expression of GluR2 and β1 and β3 integrins (bicuculline, β3, n=28 images; TTX, β3, n=65; bicuculline, β1, n=30; TTX, β1, n=30; bicuculline, GluR2, n=16; TTX, GluR2, n=18; *p=0.03, **p=0.006, ***p−/− and β3+/− mouse primary cultures incubated with (red) or without (black) TTX (1 μM, 48 h; β3−/−, n=21; β3−/−+TTX, n=21; β3+/−, n=16; β3+/−+TTX, n=18; p=0.008 between β3+/− and β3+/− +TTX). Insets, mEPSC population averages from representative experiments. Scale bars are 4 ms and 10 pA. (H) As in G but for CA1 pyramidal neurons of mouse hippocampal slice cultures (β3−/−, n=18; β3−/−+TTX, n=19; β3+/−, n=18; β3+/−+TTX, n=18; p=0.000003 between β3+/− and β3+/−+TTX). Scale bars for insets are 8 ms and 5 pA.

References

    1. Adesnik H, Nicoll RA. Conservation of glutamate receptor 2-containing AMPA receptors during long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4598–4602.
    1. Ashby MC, De La Rue SA, Ralph GS, Uney J, Collingridge GL, Henley JM. Removal of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) from synapses is preceded by transient endocytosis of extrasynaptic AMPARs. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5172–5176.
    1. Beattie EC, Carroll RC, Yu X, Morishita W, Yasuda H, von Zastrow M, Malenka RC. Regulation of AMPA receptor endocytosis by a signaling mechanism shared with LTD. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1291–1300.
    1. Benson DL, Schnapp LM, Shapiro L, Huntley GW. Making memories stick: cell-adhesion molecules in synaptic plasticity. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:473–482.
    1. Blaess S, Kammerer RA, Hall H. Structural analysis of the sixth immunoglobulin-like domain of mouse neural cell adhesion molecule L1 and its interactions with alpha(v)beta3, alpha(IIb)beta3, and alpha5beta1 integrins. J Neurochem. 1998;71:2615–2625.
    1. Blanpied TA, Scott DB, Ehlers MD. Dynamics and regulation of clathrin coats at specialized endocytic zones of dendrites and spines. Neuron. 2002;36:435–449.
    1. Bos JL, de Rooij J, Reedquist KA. Rap1 signalling: adhering to new models. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:369–377.
    1. Bourgin C, Murai KK, Richter M, Pasquale EB. The EphA4 receptor regulates dendritic spine remodeling by affecting beta1-integrin signaling pathways. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:1295–1307.
    1. Buckley CD, Pilling D, Henriquez NV, Parsonage G, Threlfall K, Scheel-Toellner D, Simmons DL, Akbar AN, Lord JM, Salmon M. RGD peptides induce apoptosis by direct caspase-3 activation. Nature. 1999;397:534–539.
    1. Carroll RC, Lissin DV, von Zastrow M, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC. Rapid redistribution of glutamate receptors contributes to long-term depression in hippocampal cultures. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:454–460.
    1. Chan CS, Weeber EJ, Kurup S, Sweatt JD, Davis RL. Integrin requirement for hippocampal synaptic plasticity and spatial memory. J Neurosci. 2003;23:7107–7116.
    1. Chan CS, Weeber EJ, Zong L, Fuchs E, Sweatt JD, Davis RL. Beta 1-integrins are required for hippocampal AMPA receptor-dependent synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity, and working memory. J Neurosci. 2006;26:223–232.
    1. Chavis P, Westbrook G. Integrins mediate functional pre- and postsynaptic maturation at a hippocampal synapse. Nature. 2001;411:317–321.
    1. Chen BM, Grinnell AD. Integrins and modulation of transmitter release from motor nerve terminals by stretch. Science. 1995;269:1578–1580.
    1. Chen BM, Grinnell AD. Kinetics, Ca2+ dependence, and biophysical properties of integrin-mediated mechanical modulation of transmitter release from frog motor nerve terminals. J Neurosci. 1997;17:904–916.
    1. Davis GW. Homeostatic control of neural activity: from phenomenology to molecular design. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:307–323.
    1. De Simoni A, Griesinger CB, Edwards FA. Development of rat CA1 neurones in acute versus organotypic slices: role of experience in synaptic morphology and activity. J Physiol. 2003;550:135–147.
    1. Dityatev A, Schachner M. Extracellular matrix molecules and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:456–468.
    1. Ehlers MD. Reinsertion or degradation of AMPA receptors determined by activity-dependent endocytic sorting. Neuron. 2000;28:511–525.
    1. Franke B, Akkerman JW, Bos JL. Rapid Ca2+-mediated activation of Rap1 in human platelets. Embo J. 1997;16:252–259.
    1. Fu Z, Lee SH, Simonetta A, Hansen J, Sheng M, Pak DT. Differential roles of Rap1 and Rap2 small GTPases in neurite retraction and synapse elimination in hippocampal spiny neurons. J Neurochem. 2007;100:118–131.
    1. Gao B, Saba TM, Tsan MF. Role of alpha(v)beta(3)-integrin in TNF-alpha-induced endothelial cell migration. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283:C1196–1205.
    1. Gomperts SN, Rao A, Craig AM, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Postsynaptically silent synapses in single neuron cultures. Neuron. 1998;21:1443–1451.
    1. Grotewiel MS, Beck CD, Wu KH, Zhu XR, Davis RL. Integrin-mediated short-term memory in Drosophila. Nature. 1998;391:455–460.
    1. Hodivala-Dilke KM, McHugh KP, Tsakiris DA, Rayburn H, Crowley D, Ullman-Cullere M, Ross FP, Coller BS, Teitelbaum S, Hynes RO. Beta3-integrin-deficient mice are a model for Glanzmann thrombasthenia showing placental defects and reduced survival. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:229–238.
    1. Huang Z, Shimazu K, Woo NH, Zang K, Muller U, Lu B, Reichardt LF. Distinct roles of the beta 1-class integrins at the developing and the mature hippocampal excitatory synapse. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11208–11219.
    1. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110:673–687.
    1. Ju W, Morishita W, Tsui J, Gaietta G, Deerinck TJ, Adams SR, Garner CC, Tsien RY, Ellisman MH, Malenka RC. Activity-dependent regulation of dendritic synthesis and trafficking of AMPA receptors. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:244–253.
    1. Kennedy MB, Beale HC, Carlisle HJ, Washburn LR. Integration of biochemical signalling in spines. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:423–434.
    1. LaFlamme SE, Thomas LA, Yamada SS, Yamada KM. Single subunit chimeric integrins as mimics and inhibitors of endogenous integrin functions in receptor localization, cell spreading and migration, and matrix assembly. J Cell Biol. 1994;126:1287–1298.
    1. Lin JW, Ju W, Foster K, Lee SH, Ahmadian G, Wyszynski M, Wang YT, Sheng M. Distinct molecular mechanisms and divergent endocytotic pathways of AMPA receptor internalization. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1282–1290.
    1. Lissin DV, Carroll RC, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC, von Zastrow M. Rapid, activation-induced redistribution of ionotropic glutamate receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1263–1272.
    1. Liu S, Calderwood DA, Ginsberg MH. Integrin cytoplasmic domain-binding proteins. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(Pt 20):3563–3571.
    1. Luscher C, Xia H, Beattie EC, Carroll RC, von Zastrow M, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Role of AMPA receptor cycling in synaptic transmission and plasticity. Neuron. 1999;24:649–658.
    1. Man HY, Lin JW, Ju WH, Ahmadian G, Liu L, Becker LE, Sheng M, Wang YT. Regulation of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission by clathrin-dependent receptor internalization. Neuron. 2000;25:649–662.
    1. Matsui T, Sekiguchi M, Hashimoto A, Tomita U, Nishikawa T, Wada K. Functional comparison of D-serine and glycine in rodents: the effect on cloned NMDA receptors and the extracellular concentration. J Neurochem. 1995;65:454–458.
    1. Miranti CK, Brugge JS. Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:E83–90.
    1. Morales M, Colicos MA, Goda Y. Actin-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter release at central synapses. Neuron. 2000;27:539–550.
    1. Nishimune A, Isaac JT, Molnar E, Noel J, Nash SR, Tagaya M, Collingridge GL, Nakanishi S, Henley JM. NSF binding to GluR2 regulates synaptic transmission. Neuron. 1998;21:87–97.
    1. Noel J, Ralph GS, Pickard L, Williams J, Molnar E, Uney JB, Collingridge GL, Henley JM. Surface expression of AMPA receptors in hippocampal neurons is regulated by an NSF-dependent mechanism. Neuron. 1999;23:365–376.
    1. O'Brien RJ, Kamboj S, Ehlers MD, Rosen KR, Fischbach GD, Huganir RL. Activity-dependent modulation of synaptic AMPA receptor accumulation. Neuron. 1998;21:1067–1078.
    1. Passafaro M, Piech V, Sheng M. Subunit-specific temporal and spatial patterns of AMPA receptor exocytosis in hippocampal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:917–926.
    1. Pasterkamp RJ, Peschon JJ, Spriggs MK, Kolodkin AL. Semaphorin 7A promotes axon outgrowth through integrins and MAPKs. Nature. 2003;424:398–405.
    1. Pfaff M, McLane MA, Beviglia L, Niewiarowski S, Timpl R. Comparison of disintegrins with limited variation in the RGD loop in their binding to purified integrins alpha IIb beta 3, alpha V beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 and in cell adhesion inhibition. Cell Adhes Commun. 1994;2:491–501.
    1. Pinkstaff JK, Detterich J, Lynch G, Gall C. Integrin subunit gene expression is regionally differentiated in adult brain. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1541–1556.
    1. Plant K, Pelkey KA, Bortolotto ZA, Morita D, Terashima A, McBain CJ, Collingridge GL, Isaac JT. Transient incorporation of native GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors during hippocampal long-term potentiation. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:602–604.
    1. Reuther GW, Der CJ. The Ras branch of small GTPases: Ras family members don't fall far from the tree. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:157–165.
    1. Rohrbough J, Grotewiel MS, Davis RL, Broadie K. Integrin-mediated regulation of synaptic morphology, transmission, and plasticity. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6868–6878.
    1. Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:697–715.
    1. Rutherford LC, Nelson SB, Turrigiano GG. BDNF has opposite effects on the quantal amplitude of pyramidal neuron and interneuron excitatory synapses. Neuron. 1998;21:521–530.
    1. Shi Y, Ethell IM. Integrins control dendritic spine plasticity in hippocampal neurons through NMDA receptor and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-mediated actin reorganization. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1813–1822.
    1. Smilenov LB, Mikhailov A, Pelham RJ, Marcantonio EE, Gundersen GG. Focal adhesion motility revealed in stationary fibroblasts. Science. 1999;286:1172–1174.
    1. Song I, Kamboj S, Xia J, Dong H, Liao D, Huganir RL. Interaction of the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor with AMPA receptors. Neuron. 1998;21:393–400.
    1. Staubli U, Chun D, Lynch G. Time-dependent reversal of long-term potentiation by an integrin antagonist. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3460–3469.
    1. Stellwagen D, Beattie EC, Seo JY, Malenka RC. Differential regulation of AMPA receptor and GABA receptor trafficking by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Neurosci. 2005;25:3219–3228.
    1. Stellwagen D, Malenka RC. Synaptic scaling mediated by glial TNF-alpha. Nature. 2006;440:1054–1059.
    1. Sutton MA, Ito HT, Cressy P, Kempf C, Woo JC, Schuman EM. Miniature neurotransmission stabilizes synaptic function via tonic suppression of local dendritic protein synthesis. Cell. 2006;125:785–799.
    1. Terashima A, Cotton L, Dev KK, Meyer G, Zaman S, Duprat F, Henley JM, Collingridge GL, Isaac JT. Regulation of synaptic strength and AMPA receptor subunit composition by PICK1. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5381–5390.
    1. Thiagarajan TC, Lindskog M, Tsien RW. Adaptation to synaptic inactivity in hippocampal neurons. Neuron. 2005;47:725–737.
    1. Thomas GM, Huganir RL. MAPK cascade signalling and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:173–183.
    1. Turrigiano GG, Leslie KR, Desai NS, Rutherford LC, Nelson SB. Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature. 1998;391:892–896.
    1. Webb DJ, Zhang H, Majumdar D, Horwitz AF. alpha5 integrin signaling regulates the formation of spines and synapses in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:6929–6935.
    1. Wierenga CJ, Ibata K, Turrigiano GG. Postsynaptic expression of homeostatic plasticity at neocortical synapses. J Neurosci. 2005;25:2895–2905.
    1. Wildering WC, Hermann PM, Bulloch AG. Rapid neuromodulatory actions of integrin ligands. J Neurosci. 2002;22:2419–2426.
    1. Wu X, Mogford JE, Platts SH, Davis GE, Meininger GA, Davis MJ. Modulation of calcium current in arteriolar smooth muscle by alphav beta3 and alpha5 beta1 integrin ligands. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:241–252.
    1. Xia Z, Dudek H, Miranti CK, Greenberg ME. Calcium influx via the NMDA receptor induces immediate early gene transcription by a MAP kinase/ERK-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5425–5436.
    1. Xie Z, Huganir RL, Penzes P. Activity-dependent dendritic spine structural plasticity is regulated by small GTPase Rap1 and its target AF-6. Neuron. 2005;48:605–618.
    1. Yamagata M, Sanes JR, Weiner JA. Synaptic adhesion molecules. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;15:621–632.
    1. Zhu JJ, Qin Y, Zhao M, Van Aelst L, Malinow R. Ras and Rap control AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity. Cell. 2002;110:443–455.
    1. Zhu Y, Pak D, Qin Y, McCormack SG, Kim MJ, Baumgart JP, Velamoor V, Auberson YP, Osten P, van Aelst L, et al. Rap2-JNK removes synaptic AMPA receptors during depotentiation. Neuron. 2005;46:905–916.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe