Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Michael J Hughes, Rosie J Hackney, Peter J Lamb, Stephen J Wigmore, D A Christopher Deans, Richard J E Skipworth, Michael J Hughes, Rosie J Hackney, Peter J Lamb, Stephen J Wigmore, D A Christopher Deans, Richard J E Skipworth

Abstract

Introduction: Prehabilitation prior to major surgery has increased in popularity over recent years and aims to improve pre-operative conditioning of patients to improve post-operative outcomes. The beneficial effect of such protocols is not well established with conflicting results reported. This review aimed to assess the effect of prehabilitation on post-operative outcome after major abdominal surgery.

Methods: EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane database were searched in August 2018 for trials comparing outcomes of patients undergoing prehabilitation involving prescribed respiratory and exercise interventions prior to abdominal surgery. Study characteristics, overall and pulmonary morbidity, length of stay (LOS), maximum inspiratory pressure and change in six-minute walking test (6MWT) distance were obtained. The primary outcome was post-operative overall morbidity within 30 days. Dichotomous data were analysed by fixed or random effects odds ratio. Continuous data were analysed with weighted mean difference.

Results: Fifteen RCTs were included in the analysis with 457 prehabilitation patients and 450 control group patients. A significant reduction in overall (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.46-0.87 I2 34%, p = 0.005) and pulmonary morbidity (OR 0.4 95% CI 0.23-0.68, I2 = 0%, p = 0.0007) was observed in the prehabilitation group. No significant difference in LOS (WMD -2.39 95% CI -4.86 to 0.08 I2 = 0%, p = 0.06) or change in 6MWT distance (WMD 9.06 95% CI -35.68, 53.81 I2 = 88%, p = 0.69) was observed.

Conclusions: Prehabilitation can reduce overall and pulmonary morbidity following surgery and could be utilised routinely. The precise protocol of prehabilitation has not been completely established. Further work is required to tailor optimal prehabilitation protocols for specific operative procedures.

References

    1. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Jul;27(7):616-27
    1. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):146-87
    1. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1187-97
    1. Am J Surg. 2013 Aug;206(2):202-9
    1. Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):128-133
    1. Scand J Urol. 2015 Apr;49(2):133-41
    1. BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 02;6(2):e009857
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2015 May;29(5):426-38
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Nov;20(11):1836-1843
    1. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(10):1721-7
    1. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800
    1. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):50-56
    1. Clin Nutr. 2012 Feb;31(1):74-7
    1. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95
    1. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
    1. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Feb;217(2):109-15
    1. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):504-12
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Nov;92(8):700-7
    1. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;114(2):244-51
    1. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
    1. Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):937-47
    1. BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1192-7
    1. Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):196-207
    1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13
    1. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Feb 27;9(2):37-45
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Feb;25(2):99-111
    1. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Feb;18(2):177-182
    1. Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1791-1801
    1. Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1189-1201
    1. Obes Surg. 2015 Jun;25(6):1003-9
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jul;24(7):614-22
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2008 Feb;22(2):134-42
    1. Ann Surg. 2016 Jul;264(1):47-53

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe