Using activity-based therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury or disease: Interviews with physical and occupational therapists in rehabilitation hospitals

Hope Jervis Rademeyer, Cindy Gauthier, José Zariffa, Kristen Walden, Tara Jeji, Shane McCullum, Kristin E Musselman, Hope Jervis Rademeyer, Cindy Gauthier, José Zariffa, Kristen Walden, Tara Jeji, Shane McCullum, Kristin E Musselman

Abstract

Objective: To understand if and how physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) use activity-based therapy (ABT) and its associated technologies for the rehabilitation of individuals living with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) in Canadian rehabilitation hospital settings.

Design: Qualitative study.

Setting: Through rehabilitation hospitals participating in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry, we recruited licensed OTs and PTs to participate in focus groups.

Participants: Twelve PTs and ten OTs from nine sites across eight provinces participated.

Outcome measures: To inform the development of a semi-structured interview guide, we used the Theoretical Domains Framework. To analyze the data, we used interpretive description.

Results: We identified three themes that influenced therapists' use of ABT and associated technologies for SCI/D rehabilitation. (1) Therapists' decision-making approach to ABT and technology. Therapist roles, site-specific dynamics and goal setting influenced decision-making. Assuming roles such as mentor, liaison and advocate led to more ABT use. Site-specific dynamics concerned levels of ABT knowledge, teamwork, and staffing. In hospital rehabilitation, there was competition between discharge and neurorecovery goals. (2) Therapist perceived individual factors. Patient factors either increased (i.e. patients' motivation, self-advocacy) or prevented (i.e. mourning period, tolerance) the likelihood that ABT was introduced by therapists. (3) ABT and equipment access. Technology was used for ABT in a variety of ways. Access was affected by visible (e.g. equipment cost) and invisible barriers (e.g. departmental relations).

Conclusions: The use of ABT and its associated technologies in Canadian rehabilitation hospitals is variable. Ongoing education could be offered, and site-specific implementation strategies could be developed, to promote ABT use.

Keywords: Activity-based therapy; Qualitative research; Rehabilitation; Technology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic representation of the themes and subthemes as they relate to the determinants of ABT and/or technology implementation.

References

    1. Kleim JA, Jones TA.. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech, Lang Hear Res 2008;51(1):225–239. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018).
    1. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ.. Physical rehabilitation as an agent for recovery after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2007.02.002
    1. Dromerick AW, Lum PS, Hidler J.. Activity-based therapies. NeuroRx 2006;3(4):428–438. doi:10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.004.
    1. Yang JF, Musselman KE, Livingstone D, et al. . Repetitive mass practice or focused precise practice for retraining walking after incomplete spinal cord injury? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014. doi:10.1177/1545968313508473
    1. Swaffield E, Cheung L, Khalili A, et al. . Perspectives of people living with a spinal cord injury on activity-based therapy. Disabil Rehabil 2021;0(0):1–9. doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1878293.
    1. Kaiser A, Chan K, Pakosh M, Musselman KE.. Characteristics of activity-based therapy interventions for people living with spinal cord injury or disease across the continuum of care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e040014. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040014.
    1. Kaiser A, Chan K, Pakosh M, McCullum S, Rice C, Zariffa J, Musselman KE.. The characteristics of activity-based therapy interventions for people living with spinal cord injury or disease across the continuum of care: A scoping review. abstracts. J Spinal Cord Med 2021;44(sup1):S278–S324. doi:10.1080/10790268.2021.1957653.
    1. Musselman KE, Walden K, Noonan V, et al. . Development of priorities for a Canadian strategy to advance activity-based therapies after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2021;59(8):874–884.
    1. Cheung L, Musselman KE, Kaiser A, Jervis Rademeyer H, Walden K, Marshall S, Gauthier C.. Activity-based therapy in the community for individuals living with spinal cord injury or disease: qualitative interviews with clinicians. Disabil Rehabil. 2021:1–4. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1923072. Online ahead of print.
    1. Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV, Verrier MC.. Movement repetitions in physical and occupational therapy during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 2017;55(2):172–179. doi:10.1038/sc.2016.129.
    1. Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Noble JW, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV, Verrier MC.. Cardiovascular stress during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.009
    1. Noonan V, Kwon B, Soril L, et al. . The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry. Spinal Cord 2012;50:22–27. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.109.
    1. Musselman KE, Shah M, Zariffa J.. Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: translational potential of current trends. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018. doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0386-7
    1. Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. . A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci 2017;12(1):1–18. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
    1. Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J.. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Heal. 1997. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>;2-I
    1. Thorne S, Kirkham SR, O’Flynn-Magee K.. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods. 2004. doi:10.1177/160940690400300101
    1. Hunt MR. Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qual Health Res. 2009. doi:10.1177/1049732309344612
    1. Dolbow DR, Gorgey AS, Recio AC, et al. . Activity-based restorative therapies after spinal cord injury: inter-institutional conceptions and perceptions. Aging Dis 2015;6(4):254–261. doi:10.14336/AD.2014.1105.
    1. Blumenthal J, Wilkinson A, Chignell M.. Physiotherapists’ and physiotherapy students’ perspectives on the use of mobile or wearable technology in their practice. Physiother Can 2018;70(3):251–261. doi:10.3138/ptc.2016-100.e.
    1. Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JA, Warren JG.. Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behav Inf Technol 2002;21(1):47–57.
    1. Tatla SK, Shirzad N, Lohse KR, Virji-Babul N, Hoens AM, Holsti L, et al. . Therapists’ perceptions of social media and video game technologies in upper limb rehabilitation. JMIR Serious Games 2015 Mar 10;3(1):e2. doi:10.2196/games.3401.
    1. Fusch GE. What happens when the ROI model does not fit? Performance Improvement Quarterly 2001 Dec;14(4):60–76. doi:10.5590/IJAMT.2015.14.1.0x.
    1. Paulus TM, Woodside M, Ziegler MF.. I tell you, it’s a journey, isn’t it?” Understanding collaborative meaning making in qualitative research. Qual Inq 2010 Dec;16(10):852–862.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe