Participation restriction and assistance needs in people with spinal cord injuries of more than 40 year duration

Gordana Savic, Hans L Frankel, Mohamed Ali Jamous, Bakulesh M Soni, Susan Charlifue, Gordana Savic, Hans L Frankel, Mohamed Ali Jamous, Bakulesh M Soni, Susan Charlifue

Abstract

Study design: Prospective observational.

Objectives: Examine changes in participation restriction and assistance needs in a sample of people with long-standing spinal cord injuries (SCIs).

Setting: Two British spinal centres.

Methods: The sample consisted of British ageing with SCI study participants who were seen at baseline (1990 or 1993) and in the final follow-up (2010). Outcome measures were the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique-Short Form (CHART-SF) and interview questions about assistance needs.

Results: Eighty-five Ageing study participants took part in 2010; their mean age was 67.65 years and the mean time since injury was 46.26 years. The mean CHART-SF physical independence subscore decreased from 97.44 in 1990 to 91.26 in 2010, mobility from 95.58 to 82.10, occupation from 86.82 to 64.49 and social integration from 96.29 to 88.68 (all p < 0.05). Increasing assistance needs were reported by 10.1% of participants in 1990, by 36.6% in 2010 (p < 0.05) and by 62.4% over the entire 20-year study period. Persons requiring more assistance were older and injured longer, had a more severe SCI and lower self-reported quality of life and life satisfaction (p < 0.05). In the multivariate logistic regression, the strongest predictor of needing more assistance was injury severity (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: An increase in participation restriction and in assistance needs was reported over the 20 year follow-up in persons injured more than 40 years ago. SCI severity was the main risk factor for needing more assistance. Clinical awareness of how participation changes with age may help provide timely intervention and offset declines.

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. .
    1. Charlifue S, Jha A, Lammertse D. Aging with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21:383–402. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.12.002.
    1. Savic G, Charlifue S, Glass C, Soni BM, Gerhart KA, Jamous MA. British ageing with SCI study: changes in physical and psychosocial outcomes over time. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2010;15:41–53. doi: 10.1310/sci1503-41.
    1. Gerhart KA, Bergstrom E, Charlifue SW, Menter RR, Whiteneck GG. Long-term spinal cord injury: functional changes over time. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1030–4. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90057-H.
    1. Liem NR, McColl MA, King W, Smith KM. Aging with a spinal cord injury: Factors associated with the need for more help with activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1567–77. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.038.
    1. Thompson L. Functional changes in persons aging with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol. 1999;11:123–9. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1999.10131996.
    1. Savic G, Charlifue S. Aging with spinal cord injury. In: Chhabra HS, editor. ISCoS textbook on comprehensive management of spinal cord injuries. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. pp. 906–17.
    1. Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19:91–101.
    1. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Frankel HL, Fraser MH, Gardner BP, Gerhart MS. Mortality, morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 20 years. Paraplegia. 1992;30:617–30.
    1. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–26.
    1. Wood V, Wylie ML, Sheafor B. An analysis of a short self-report measure of life satisfaction: correlation with rater judgments. J Gerontol. 1969;24:465–9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/24.4.465.
    1. American Spinal Injury Association. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Spinal Injury Association; 2015.
    1. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
    1. Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, Brooks CA, Charlifue SB, Gerhart KA. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1324–35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.027.
    1. Lundström U, Wahman K, Seiger A, Gray DB, Isaksson G, Lilja M. Participation in activities and secondary health complications among persons aging with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:367–72. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.153.
    1. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:170–80. doi: 10.1080/096382800296863.
    1. Krause JS, Coker JL. Aging after spinal cord injury: a 30-year longitudinal study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29:371–6. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753885.
    1. Krause JS, Newman JC, Clark JM, Dunn M. The natural course of spinal cord injury: changes over 40 years among those with exceptional survival. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:502–8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.159.
    1. Pollard C, Kennedy P. A longitudinal analysis of emotional impact, coping strategies and post-traumatic psychological growth following spinal cord injury: a 10-year review. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12:347–62. doi: 10.1348/135910707X197046.
    1. Whiteneck G, Forchheimer M, Krause JS. Quality of life and health in the last years after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2007;12:77–90. doi: 10.1310/sci1203-77.
    1. Sakakibara BM, Hitzig SL, Miller WC, Eng JJ, SCIRE Research Team. An evidence-based review on the influence of aging with a spinal cord injury on subjective quality of life. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:570–8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.19.
    1. Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1793–803. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.024.
    1. Barclay L, McDonald R, Lentin P. Social and community participation following spinal cord injury: a critical review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:1–19. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000085.
    1. Rodakowski J, Skidmore ER, Rogers JC, Schulz R. Does social support impact depression in caregivers of adults ageing with spinal cord injuries? Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:565–75. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464503.
    1. Weitzenkamp DA, Gerhart KA, Charlifue SW, Whiteneck GG, Savic G. Spouses of spinal cord injury survivors: the added impact of caregiving. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:822–7. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90194-5.
    1. Baker A, Barker S, Sampson A, Martin C. Caregiver outcomes and interventions: a systematic scoping review of the traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury literature. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:45–60. doi: 10.1177/0269215516639357.
    1. Pentland W, McColl MA, Rosenthal C. The effect of aging and duration of disability on long term health outcomes following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1995;33:367–73.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe