The 30-day survival and recovery after hip fracture by timing of mobilization and dementia : a UK database study
Aicha Goubar, Finbarr C Martin, Chris Potter, Gareth D Jones, Catherine Sackley, Salma Ayis, Katie J Sheehan, Aicha Goubar, Finbarr C Martin, Chris Potter, Gareth D Jones, Catherine Sackley, Salma Ayis, Katie J Sheehan
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study to compare 30-day survival and recovery of mobility between patients mobilized early (on the day of, or day after surgery for a hip fracture) and patients mobilized late (two days or more after surgery), and to determine whether the presence of dementia influences the association between the timing of mobilization, 30-day survival, and recovery.
Methods: Analysis of the National Hip Fracture Database and hospital records for 126,897 patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent surgery for a hip fracture in England and Wales between 2014 and 2016. Using logistic regression, we adjusted for covariates with a propensity score to estimate the association between the timing of mobilization, survival, and recovery of walking ability.
Results: A total of 99,667 patients (79%) mobilized early. Among those mobilized early compared to those mobilized late, the weighted odds ratio of survival was 1.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.05), of recovering outdoor ambulation was 1.25 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.51), and of recovering indoor ambulation was 1.53 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.78) by 30 days. The weighted probabilities of survival at 30 days post-admission were 95.9% (95% CI 95.7% to 96.0%) for those who mobilized early and 92.4% (95% CI 92.0% to 92.8%) for those who mobilized late. The weighted probabilities of regaining the ability to walk outdoors were 9.7% (95% CI 9.2% to 10.2%) and indoors 81.2% (95% CI 80.0% to 82.4%), for those who mobilized early, and 7.9% (95% CI 6.6% to 9.2%) and 73.8% (95% CI 71.3% to 76.2%), respectively, for those who mobilized late. Patients with dementia were less likely to mobilize early despite observed associations with survival and ambulation recovery for those with and without dementia.
Conclusion: Early mobilization is associated with survival and recovery for patients (with and without dementia) after hip fracture. Early mobilization should be incorporated as a measured indicator of quality. Reasons for failure to mobilize early should also be recorded to inform quality improvement initiatives. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1317-1324.
Keywords: Cognitive impairment; Mortality; Neck of femur; Weightbearing.
Figures
References
- Royal College of Physicians. National Hip Fracture Database annual report 2019. RCP; London:
- Neuburger J, Currie C, Wakeman R, et al. The Impact of a National Clinician-led Audit Initiative on Care and Mortality after Hip Fracture in England: An External Evaluation using Time Trends in Non-audit Data. MedCare. 2015;53(8):686–91.
- National Clinical Guideline Centre. The management of hip fracture in adults. National Clinical Guidelines Centre; London: 2011.
- Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001885.
- Siu AL, Penrod JD, Boockvar KS, et al. Early ambulation after hip fracture: effects on function and mortality. ArchInternMed. 2006;166(7):766–71.
- Su B, Newson R, Soljak H, et al. Associations between post-operative rehabilitation of hip fracture and outcomes: national database analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):211.
- Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Almilaji O, et al. Discharge after hip fracture surgery by mobilisation timing: secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database. Age Ageing. 2020 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa204.
- Bai J, Zhang P, Liang X, et al. Association between dementia and mortality in the elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):298.
- Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, et al. Randomised, clinically controlled trial of intensive geriatric rehabilitation in patients with hip fracture: subgroup analysis of patients with dementia. BMJ. 2000;321(7269):1107–11.
- Royal College of Physicians. National Hip Fracture Database annual report 2016. RCP; London:
- StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC; College Station, TX: 2019.
- Leuven E, Sianesi B. PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing [program] 2003
- Newson Roger. SCENTTEST: Stata module to compute scenario arithmetic means and their difference. 2015 .
- Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.
- White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–99.
- Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci. 2007;8(3):206–13.
- Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1987.
- Penning de Vries B, Groenwold R. Comments on propensity score matching following multiple imputation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25(6):3066–68.
- Mitra R, Reiter JP. A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25(1):188–204.
- Kamel HK, Iqbal MA, Mogallapu R, et al. Time to ambulation after hip fracture surgery: relation to hospitalization outcomes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58(11):1042–5.
- Ferris H, Brent L, Coughlan T. Early mobilisation reduces the risk of in-hospital mortality following hip fracture. Eur Geriatr Med. 2020
- Oldmeadow LB, Edwards ER, Kimmel LA, et al. No rest for the wounded: early ambulation after hip surgery accelerates recovery. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(7):607–11.
- Sobolev B, Guy P, Sheehan KJ, et al. Mortality effects of timing alternatives for hip fracture surgery. CMAJ. 2018;190(31):E923–E32.
- Kristensen PK, Thillemann TM, Soballe K, et al. Can improved quality of care explain the success of orthogeriatric units? A population-based cohort study. Age Ageing. 2016;45(1):66–71.
- Johansen A, Golding D, Brent L, et al. Using national hip fracture registries and audit databases to develop an international perspective. Injury. 2017;48(10):2174–79.
- Hall AJ, Watkins R, Lang IA, et al. The experiences of physiotherapists treating people with dementia who fracture their hip. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):91.
- Cundall-Curry DJ, Lawrence JE, Fountain DM, et al. Data errors in the National Hip Fracture Database: a local validation study. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(10):1406–09.
- Uzoigwe CE, O’Leary L, Nduka J, et al. Factors associated with delirium and cognitive decline following hip fracture surgery. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(12):1675–81.
- Royal College of Physicians. Recovering after a hip fracture: helping people understand physiotherapy in the NHS. Physiotherapy ‘Hip Sprint’ audit report; London: 2017. Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Programme.
- Neuburger J, Harding KA, Bradley RJ, et al. Variation in access to community rehabilitation services and length of stay in hospital following a hip fracture: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005469
- National Benchmarking Network. National Audit of Intermediate Care. Summary Report - England. Assessing progress in services aimed at maximising independence and reducing use of hospitals. NHS England; 2017. pp. 38–41.
Source: PubMed