Ultrasound morphological patterns of testicular tumours, correlation with histopathology

Martin Necas, Muthappan Muthupalaniappaan, Cecilia Barnard, Martin Necas, Muthappan Muthupalaniappaan, Cecilia Barnard

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) plays a key role in the detection of testicular tumours. However, reliable characterisation of testicular tumours with US is difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate the morphological patterns of testicular tumours as seen on modern US imaging and correlate these with histology.

Methods: The imaging features of 50 testicular tumours were analysed and compared with histology. The US appearance was categorized into 15 distinct morphological patterns.

Results: Patient's age ranged from 0.5 to 85 years. Of the 50 tumours in our series, 49 were malignant. Nearly half of the malignancies were seminomatous germ cell tumours (SGCTs). Tumours ranged in size from 10 to 130 mm with considerable overlap of size between tumours of different histological type. Even small (10 mm) tumours in our cohort were malignant. SGCTs demonstrated a narrower range of morphological appearances than non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs). Calcification was common in both SGCT and NSGCTs. Multicomponent cystic-solid appearance was only seen in NSGCTs.

Conclusion: The differentiation of testicular tumours with US continues to be challenging. In this paper, we have demonstrated the diverse morphological patterns of testicular neoplasms and have proposed the study of tumour morphological features as a promising research direction.

Keywords: Scrotum; testis; tumour; ultrasound.

© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of tumours in different size categories based on visual estimation of tumour volume.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Size distribution of the three most common tumour types.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Morphological patterns of testicular tumours as seen on ultrasound.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mixed GCT with a sonographically classic appearance of seminoma in the lower pole and distinctly different tumour component (embryonal cell carcinoma) in the upper pole, histologically confirmed.

References

    1. Schwerk WB, Schwerk WN, Rodeck G. Testicular tumors: Prospective analysis of real‐time US patterns and abdominal staging. Radiology 1987; 164: 369–74.
    1. Kreydin EI, Barrisford GW, Feldman AS, Preston MA. Testicular cancer: What the radiologist needs to know. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 1215–25.
    1. Shtricker A, Silver D, Sorin E, et al. The value of testicular ultrasound in the prediction of the type and size of testicular tumors. Int Braz J Urol 2015; 41: 655–60.
    1. Marko J, Wolfman DJ, Aubin AL, Sesterhenn IA. Testicular seminoma and its mimics: From the radiologic pathology archives. Radiographics 2017; 37: 1085–98.
    1. Marth D, Scheidegger J, Studer UE. Ultrasonography of testicular tumors. Urol Int 1990; 45: 237–40.
    1. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, et al. Testicular cancer, version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13: 772–99.
    1. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI‐RADS): White paper of the ACR TI‐RADS committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14: 587–95.
    1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016; 26: 1–133.
    1. Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: A consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 500–5.
    1. Leone FPG, Timmerman D, Bourne T, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: A consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 103–12.
    1. Song G, Xiong G‐Y, Fan Y, et al. The role of tumor size, ultrasonographic findings, and serum tumor markers in predicting the likelihood of malignant testicular histology. Asian J Androl 2019; 21: 196–200.
    1. Kawamoto A, Hatano T, Saito K, Inoue R, Nagao T, Sanada S. Sonographic classification of testicular tumors by tissue harmonic imaging: Experience of 58 cases. J Med Ultrasonics 2018; 45: 103–11.
    1. Isidori AM, Pozza C, Gianfrilli D, et al. Differential diagnosis of nonpalpable testicular lesions: Qualitative and quantitative contrast‐enhanced US of benign and malignant testicular tumors. Radiology 2014; 273: 606–18.
    1. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, O’Donoghue MJ, Green DE. Tumors and tumorlike lesions of the testis: Radiologic‐pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2002; 22: 189–216.
    1. Australasian Society for Ultrasound and Medicine . Guidelines for the performance of scrotal ultrasound [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from:
    1. Huang DY, Sidhu PS. Focal testicular lesions: Colour doppler ultrasound, contrast‐enhanced ultrasound and tissue elastography as adjuvants to the diagnosis. Br J Radiol 2012; 85(special_issue_1): S41–S53.
    1. Coursey Moreno C, Small WC, Camacho JC, et al. Testicular tumors: What radiologists need to know—differential diagnosis, staging, and management. Radiographics 2015; 35: 400–15.
    1. Bhatt S, Jafri SZH, Wasserman N, Dogra VS. Imaging of non‐neoplastic intratesticular masses. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011; 17: 52–63.
    1. Einstein DM, Paushter DM, Singer AA, Thomas AJ, Levin HS. Fibrotic lesions of the testicle: Sonographic patterns mimicking malignancy. Urol Radiol 1992; 14: 205–10.
    1. Pierre P, Despert F, Tranquart F, et al. Adrenal rest tissue in gonads of patients with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Multicenter study of 45 French male patients. Ann Endocrinol 2012; 73: 515–22.
    1. Atchley JTM, Dewbury KC. Ultrasound appearances of testicular epidermoid cysts: Pictorial review. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 493–502.
    1. Chen S‐T, Chiou H‐J, Pan C‐C, et al. Epidermoid cyst of the testis: An atypical sonographic appearance. J Clin Ultrasound 2016; 44: 448–51.
    1. Kim W, Rosen MA, Langer JE, Banner MP, Siegelman ES, Ramchandani P. US–MR imaging correlation in pathologic conditions of the scrotum. Radiographics 2007; 27: 1239–53.
    1. Shilo Y, Zisman A, Lindner A, et al. The predominance of benign histology in small testicular masses. Urol Oncol 2012; 30: 719–22.
    1. Rocher L, Ramchandani P, Belfield J, et al. Incidentally detected non‐palpable testicular tumors in adults at scrotal ultrasound: Impact of radiological findings on management Radiologic review and recommendations of the ESUR scrotal imaging subcommittee. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 2268–78.
    1. Carmignani L, Gadda F, Gazzano G, et al. High incidence of benign testicular neoplasms diagnosed by ultrasound. J Urol 2003; 170: 1783–6.
    1. Wood MJ, Tirumani SH, Sweeney C, Ramaiya NH, Howard SA. Approach to risk stratification in testicular germ cell tumors: A primer for radiologists. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 1871–86.
    1. Mweempwa A, Tan A, Dray M. Recurrent Merkel cell carcinoma of the testis with unknown primary site: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2016; 10(1): 314 10.1186/s13256-016-1102-5
    1. Drudi FM, Valentino M, Bertolotto M, et al. CEUS time intensity curves in the differentiation between leydig cell carcinoma and seminoma: A multicenter study. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 201–5.
    1. Pozza C, Gianfrilli D, Fattorini G, et al. Diagnostic value of qualitative and strain ratio elastography in the differential diagnosis of non‐palpable testicular lesions. Andrology 2016; 4: 1193–203.
    1. Elwagdy S, Razmy S, Ghoneim S, Elhakim S. Diagnostic performance of three‐dimensional ultrasound extended imaging at scrotal mass lesions. Int J Urol 2007; 14: 1025–33.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe