Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City

Julia Potter, Susan E Rubin, Peter Sherman, Julia Potter, Susan E Rubin, Peter Sherman

Abstract

Objective: The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is one of the most effective contraceptive methods, but it remains underutilized, especially among adolescents. Little is known about how adolescents perceive IUDs. The objective of this study is to explore urban, minority female adolescents' attitudes and beliefs about IUDs and to identify barriers to IUD use.

Study design: Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with 21 adolescents aged 14 to 21 years who had heard about the IUD but never used one personally. Participants were recruited from two urban school-based health clinics and one community health center. Individual interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Themes were identified by two independent researchers through line-by-line analysis of interview transcripts.

Results: Fear of the IUD predominated. Respondents related fears about pain, expulsion, foreign body and the potential for physical harm. Common themes in support of the IUD included the IUD's superior efficacy compared to other contraceptive methods and the ability to use this method long term. Despite identifying IUD benefits, most respondents did not appear to think the method would be well suited for them.

Conclusion: Though the IUD is safe and effective for adolescents, we found that urban female adolescents have many device-related concerns which must be addressed to make this method more acceptable.

Implications: Understanding urban, minority adolescents' perspective on IUDs and their specific concerns about IUD method use can help clinicians provide targeted and relevant contraceptive counseling.

Keywords: Attitudes; Beliefs; IUD; LARC; Qualitative; Teen.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no funding sources or conflicts of interest to disclose.

© 2014.

References

    1. Dehlendorf C, Ruskin R, Darney P, Vittinghoff E, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. The effect of patient gynecologic history on clinician contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):281–5.
    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):478–85.
    1. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W. Contraceptive technology. 20th Revised. New York: Bridging the Gap Communications; 2011.
    1. Mosher WD, Jones J. 29. Vol. 23. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics; 2010. Aug, Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. cited 2013 Jun 20. Available from: .
    1. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012 May;366(21):1998–2007.
    1. Fleming KL, Sokoloff A, Raine TR. Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception. 2010 Aug;82(2):178–82.
    1. Teal SB, Romer SE. Awareness of Long-Acting Revesible Contraception Among Teens and Young Adults. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S35–39.
    1. Barrett M, Soon R, Whitaker AK, Takekawa S, Kaneshiro B. Awareness and Knowledge of the intrauterine device in Adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):39–42.
    1. Whitaker A, Johnson LM, Harwood B, Chiappetta L, Creinin MD, Gold MA. Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):211–17.
    1. New York City Public Schools: Demographic and Enrollment Trends 1990-2002, The Bronx. 2003 Jul; Internet. [cited 14 Nov 2013]. Available from: .
    1. U,S. Census Bureau State and County QuickFacts. 2013 Jun 27; Internet. [cited 2013 Nov 14]. Available from: .
    1. New York, NY: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Bureau of Vital Statistics; 2010. Summary of Vital Statistics 2009. Internet. [cited 20 Jun 2013]. Available from: .
    1. Mollen CJ, Barg FK, Hayes KL, Gotcsik M, Blades NM, Schwarz DF. Assessing Attitudes about Emergency Contraception among Urban, Minority Adolescent Girls: An In-Depth Interview Study. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug;122(2):e395–401.
    1. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985.
    1. Rubin SE, Winrob I. Urban Female Family Medicine Patients' Perceptions About Intrauterine Contraception. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010 Apr;19(4):735–40.
    1. Tyler CP, Whiteman MK, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA. Health Care Providers Attitudes and Practices Related to Intrauterine Devices for Nulliparous Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):762–71.
    1. Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New York City physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):130–6.
    1. Foster DG, Karasek D, Grossman D, Darney P, Schwarz EB. Interest in using intrauterine contraception when the option of self-removal is provided. Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):257–62.
    1. Madden T, Allsworth JE, Hladky KJ, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes. Contraception. 2010 Feb;81(2):112–6.
    1. Asker C, Stokes-Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users, a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006 Apr;32(2):89–94.
    1. Hubacher D, Lara-Ricalde R, Taylor DJ, Guerra Infante F, Guzman-Rodriguez R. Use of Copper Intrauterine Devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug;345(8):561–7.
    1. Grimes DA. Intrauterine Device and upper-genital-tract infection. Lancet. 2000 Sep;356(9234):1013–9.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe