Opinions about the new law on end-of-life issues in a sample of french patients receiving palliative care

Augustin Boulanger, Théo Chabal, Marie Fichaux, Mireille Destandau, Jean Marc La Piana, Pascal Auquier, Karine Baumstarck, Sébastien Salas, Augustin Boulanger, Théo Chabal, Marie Fichaux, Mireille Destandau, Jean Marc La Piana, Pascal Auquier, Karine Baumstarck, Sébastien Salas

Abstract

Background: In February 2nd 2016, the French government enacted the Claeys-Leonetti law that forbade euthanasia and established the right to deep and continuous sedation for end-of-life patients. Moreover, the law also obliges clinicians to abide by any advance directives regarding treatment and investigation, except in cases where they are "obviously inappropriate" in a given medical situation, or in cases of emergency, in order to allow medical staff to take time to assess the patient's situation. Artificial feeding and hydration are considered as treatment. The aim of this report is to investigate individuals receiving palliative care about their opinion about euthanasia, about advance directives, about the right to deep and continuous sedation, and the right to stopping artificial feeding and hydration.

Methods: The study was an opinion survey conducted among patients treated in two different palliative care institutions: a palliative care unit at the University Hospital (Timone, Marseille, France) and a non-profit association palliative care home ("La Maison", Gardanne, France). Face-to-face interviews were performed by two investigators. The survey included sociodemographics, clinical data, and opinions about euthanasia, deep and continuous sedation, stopping artificial feeding and hydration, and advance directives.

Results: Forty patients were interviewed. The mean age was 59.8 years (standard deviation 12). Fifty three percent reported opposition to legalized euthanasia. Eighty three percent were in favour of the right to deep and continuous sedation in patients with refractory pain, 75% when it concerns a patient unable to express their wishes, and 68% when the patient decides to stop vital treatment. Fifty eight percent reported that artificial nutrition and hydration should be considered as care. Fifty eight percent of the patients interviewed would like to see doctors follow the express wishes contained in advance care directives and 53% that advance directives should be subject to a validity period.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates the feasibility of discussing sensitive issues such as euthanasia, continuous and deep sedation and cessation of care with patients receiving palliative care. These preliminary results point to the need to perform a larger study in order to find determinant factors in this specific situation and to incorporate them into thinking about end-of-life laws.

Keywords: Euthanasia; Opinions; Palliative care; Patients.

References

    1. Parpa E, Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Sakkas P, Patiraki E, Pistevou-Gombaki K, et al. Attitudes of health care professionals, relatives of advanced cancer patients and public towards euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Health Policy. 2010;97(2–3):160–5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.008.
    1. IFOP. Le regard des Français sur la fin de vie. 2014. .
    1. Dany L, Baumstarck K, Dudoit E, Duffaud F, Auquier P, Salas S. Determinants of favourable opinions about euthanasia in a sample of French physicians. BMC Palliat Care. 2015;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0055-6.
    1. CCNE. Rapport du CCNE sur le débat public concernant la fin de vie | Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique [Internet]. CCNE. 2014 [cité 14 mars 2016] p. 71. Disponible sur:
    1. LOI n° 2016–87 du 2 février 2016 créant de nouveaux droits en faveur des malades et des personnes en fin de vie. 2016–87 févr 2, 2016. .
    1. Devalois B, Puybasset L. New Act concerning end of life: impact for medical practice? Presse Med. 2016;45(4 Pt 1):414–21. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.02.009.
    1. Krakowski I, Boureau F, Bugat R, Chassignol L, Colombat P, Copel L, et al. For a coordination of the supportive care for people affected by severe illnesses: proposition of organization in the public and private health care centres. Bull Cancer. 2004;91(5):449–56.
    1. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–5.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, et al. Development and validation of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory. Pain. 2004;108(3):248–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.024.
    1. Dahan G. LA MANIPULATION PAR LES SONDAGES - Techniques, impacts et instrumentalisations [Internet]. L’Harmatan; [cité 14 mars 2016]. p. 192. Disponible sur:
    1. Legros B. L’euthanasie et le droit. 2 éd. Les études hospitalières. Bordeaux: LEH Edition; 2006. p. 204 (Essentiel).
    1. Johansen S, Hølen JC, Kaasa S, Loge HJ, Materstvedt LJ. Attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia in advanced cancer patients at a palliative medicine unit. Palliat Med. 2005;19(6):454–60. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1048oa.
    1. Higgins PC, Altilio T. Palliative sedation: an essential place for clinical excellence. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;3(4):3–30. doi: 10.1080/15524250802003240.
    1. Blanchet V, Viallard M-L, Aubry R. Sédation en médecine palliative: recommandations chez l’adulte et spécificités au domicile et en gériatrie. Méd Palliat Soins Support Accompagnement Éthique. 2010;9(2):59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.medpal.2010.01.006.
    1. Lassaunière J-M. Guide pratique de soins palliatifs. Tome 1, Aspects médicaux [Internet]. John Libbey Eurotext; 2000 [cité 14 mars 2016]. p. 106 (dialogue ville-hopital). Disponible sur:
    1. Devalois B, Broucke M. Nutrition and hydration at the end of life. Presse Med. 2015;44(4 Pt 1):428–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2015.02.007.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe