Trust and respect in the patient-clinician relationship: preliminary development of a new scale

Paul Crits-Christoph, Agnes Rieger, Averi Gaines, Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons, Paul Crits-Christoph, Agnes Rieger, Averi Gaines, Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons

Abstract

Background: Trust and respect may be an important component of client-provider relationships. This study aimed to develop and report preliminary psychometric analyses of a new brief measure to evaluate a patient's level of trust and respect for their clinician. The scale was designed to be applicable in multiple healthcare contexts, with a particular focus on mental healthcare.

Methods: Adult patients completed the study survey in an academic outpatient psychiatric clinic waiting room. Classical and Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses were utilized to examine the adequacy of scale items. Validity was examined in relation to the patient-therapist alliance and to willingness to share private information (social media content) with one's clinician.

Results: Beginning with 10 items, a final 8-item version of the measure was created with an internal consistency reliability of .91. Principal components analysis indicated that the scale was best viewed as capturing one overall dimension. A Graded Response Model IRT model indicated that all items contributed information on the latent dimension, and all item curves were not flat at any region. The correlation of the trust/respect total score with the alliance was .53 when respect-related items were deleted from the alliance score. The trust/respect scale was significantly associated with patient willingness to share social media posts with their clinician but the alliance was not.

Conclusions: The brief measure of patient trust and respect towards their clinician was unidimensional, showed good internal consistency, and was not redundant with existing measures of the alliance. The scale has the potential to be used in a wide variety of healthcare settings.

Keywords: Alliance; Psychotherapy; Respect; Scale development; Trust.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Test Information Curve for Total of 8-Item Trust/Respect Scale

References

    1. Simpson JA. Foundations of interpersonal trust: handbook of basic principles. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. 2. New York: Guilford; 2007. pp. 587–607.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.
    1. Erikson E. Childhood and society. New York: Norton; 1963.
    1. Mikulincer M. Attachment working models and the sense of trust: an exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(5):1209–1224. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209.
    1. Wieselquist J, Rusbult CE, Foster CA, Agnew CR. Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(5):942–966. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942.
    1. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy (Chic) 1979;16(3):252–260. doi: 10.1037/h0085885.
    1. Horvath AO, Greenberg L. Development and validation of the working Alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36(2):223–232. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.
    1. Webb CA, DeRubeis RJ, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, Hollon SD, Dimidjian S. Two aspects of the therapeutic alliance: differential relations with depressive symptom change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(3):279–283. doi: 10.1037/a0023252.
    1. Saunders SM, Howard KI, Orlinsky DE. The therapeutic bond scales: psychometric characteristics and relationship to treatment effectiveness. Psychol Assess. 1989;1(4):323–330. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.1.4.323.
    1. Peschken W, Johnson M. Therapist and client Trust in the Therapeutic Relationship. Psychother Res. 1997;7(4):439–447. doi: 10.1080/10503309712331332133.
    1. Larzelere RE, Huston TL. The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. J Marriage Fam. 1980;42(3):595–604. doi: 10.2307/351903.
    1. Curtis JM. The effect of therapist self-disclosure on patients’ perceptions of empathy, competence and trust in an analogue psychotherapeutic interaction. Psychother Res. 1982;19(1):54–62. doi: 10.1037/h0088417.
    1. LaCrosse MB, Barak A. Differential perception of counselor behavior. J Couns Psychol. 1976;23(2):170–172. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.23.2.170.
    1. Barak A, Dell DM. Differential perception of counselor behavior: replication and extension. J Couns Psychol. 1977;24(4):288–292. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.24.4.288.
    1. LaCrosse MB. Perceived counselor social influence and counseling outcome: validity of the counselor rating form. J Couns Psychol. 1980;27(4):320–327. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.27.4.320.
    1. Ponterotto JG, Furlong MJ. Evaluating counselor effectiveness: a critical review of rating scale instruments. J Couns Psychol. 1985;32(4):579–616. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.32.4.597.
    1. Tryon GS. The counselor rating form – short version: a factor analysis. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 1987;20(3):122–126. doi: 10.1080/07481756.1987.12022859.
    1. Wei M, Heppner PP. Counselor and client predictors of the initial working alliance: a replication and extension to Taiwanese client–counselor dyads. Couns Psychol. 2005;33(1):51–71. doi: 10.1177/0011000004268636.
    1. Khullar Dhruv. Building Trust in Health Care—Why, Where, and How. JAMA. 2019;322(6):507. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4892.
    1. Lee TH, McGlynn EA, Safran DG. A framework for increasing trust between patients and the organizations that care for them. JAMA. 2019;321(6):539–540. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19186.
    1. Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Hero JO. Public trust in physicians: US medicine in international perspective. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(17):1570–1572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1407373.
    1. Hall MA, Zheng BY, Dugan E, Camacho F, Kidd KE, Mishra A, et al. Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers. Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59(3):293–318. doi: 10.1177/1077558702059003004.
    1. Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998;280(19):1708–1714. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1708.
    1. Anderson AA, Dedrick FD. Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient–physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;67(3 Pt 2):1091–1100. doi: 10.2466/PR0.67.8.1091-1100.
    1. Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Farley DO, Burkhart Q, Skootsky SA, Hays RD. Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(3):447–454. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2663-2.
    1. Rogers CR. Client-centered therapy: its current practice, implications and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1951.
    1. Noyce R, Simpson J. The experience of forming a therapeutic relationship from the client’s perspective: a metasynthesis. Psychother Res. 2018;29(2):281–296. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1208373.
    1. Lexico [Internet]. Respect; [about 1 screen]. Available from: . Accessed 26 Feb 2019.
    1. Fertuck EA, Fischer S, Beeney J. Social cognition and borderline personality disorder: splitting and trust impairment findings. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018;41(4):613–632. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2018.07.003.
    1. Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the working Alliance inventory. Psychother Res. 2006;16(1):12–25. doi: 10.1080/10503300500352500.
    1. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Multivariate applications books series. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000.
    1. Corrigan JD, Schmidt LD. Development and validation of revisions in the counselor rating form. J Couns Psychol. 1983;30(1):64–75. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.30.1.64.
    1. Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003;118(4):358–365. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.358.
    1. Abel WM, Efird JT. The association between trust in health care providers and medication adherence among Black women with hypertension. Front Public Health. 2013;1:66. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00066.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe