Reduced exercise capacity in patients with tricuspid regurgitation after successful mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease

P H Groves, N P Lewis, S Ikram, R Maire, R J Hall, P H Groves, N P Lewis, S Ikram, R Maire, R J Hall

Abstract

Objective: To determine how severe tricuspid regurgitation influences exercise capacity and functional state in patients who have undergone successful mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Design: 9 patients in whom clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation developed late after mitral valve replacement were compared with 9 patients with no clinical evidence of tricuspid regurgitation. The two groups were matched for preoperative clinical and haemodynamic variables. Patients were assessed by conventional echocardiography, Doppler echocardiography, and a maximal treadmill exercise test in which expired gas was monitored by mass spectrometry.

Setting: University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff.

Subjects: 18 patients who had been reviewed regularly since mitral valve replacement.

Main outcome measure: Objective indices of exercise performance including exercise duration, maximal oxygen consumption, anaerobic threshold, and ventilatory response to exercise.

Results: Mitral valve prosthetic function was normal in all patients and estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure and left ventricular function were similar in the two groups. Right ventricular diameter (median (range) 5.0 (4.3-5.6) v 3.7 (3.0-5.4) cm, p less than 0.01) and the incidence of paradoxical septal motion (9/9 v 3/9, p less than 0.01) were greater in the group with severe tricuspid regurgitation. Exercise performance--assessed by exercise duration (6.3 (5.0-10.7) v 12.7 (7.2-16.0) min, p less than 0.01), maximum oxygen consumption (11.2 (7.3-17.8) v 17.7 (11.8-21.4) ml min-1 kg-1, p less than 0.01), and anaerobic threshold (8.3 (4.6-11.4) v 0.7 (7.3-15.5) ml min-1 kg-1, p less than 0.05)--was significantly reduced in the group with severe tricuspid regurgitation. The ventilatory response to exercise was greater in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (minute ventilation at the same minute carbon dioxide production (41.0 (29.9-59.5) v 33.6 (26.8-39.3) l/min, p less than 0.01).

Conclusions: Clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation may develop late after successful mitral valve replacement and in the absence of residual pulmonary hypertension, prosthetic dysfunction, or significant left ventricular impairment. Patients in whom severe tricuspid regurgitation developed had a considerable reduction in exercise capacity caused by an impaired cardiac output response to exercise and therefore experienced a poor functional outcome. The extent to which this was attributable to the tricuspid regurgitation itself or alternatively to the consequences of right ventricular dysfunction was not clear and requires further investigation.

References

    1. Circulation. 1981 Dec;64(6):1227-34
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1982 Jun;49(8):1832-7
    1. Respir Physiol. 1979 Feb;36(2):261-7
    1. Br J Dis Chest. 1976 Jul;70(3):185-94
    1. Ann Chir Thorac Cardiovasc. 1973 Oct;12(4):343-9
    1. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1972 Nov-Dec;25(6):555-6
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975 Nov;70(5):852-61
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1971 Jan;61(1):1-13
    1. Ann Surg. 1965 Jul;162:53-8
    1. Br Heart J. 1990 May;63(5):281-3
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Jun;60(6):2020-7
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Jul;98(1):101-10; discussion 110-1
    1. Eur Heart J. 1988 Apr;9 Suppl F:17-21
    1. Circulation. 1986 Jun;73(6):1213-22
    1. Circulation. 1984 Oct;70(4):657-62
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Nov;94(5):740-8
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Oct;94(4):542-50
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Oct;94(4):488-97
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Mar;91(3):350-61
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Feb;89(2):196-203
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Dec;90(6):872-81
    1. Am Heart J. 1985 Oct;110(4):807-13
    1. Br Heart J. 1985 Sep;54(3):321-8
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Oct;6(4):750-6
    1. Am Heart J. 1968 Feb;75(2):173-9
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Jan;99(1):124-33
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Sep 1;54(6):596-9
    1. Circulation. 1984 Jul;70(1):1-6
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1984 May 15;53(10):1447-50
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1983 May 1;51(8):1358-63
    1. Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(6):1213-23
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Dec;80(6):849-60

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe