"I would stress less if I knew that the nurse is taking care of it": Multiple Sclerosis inpatients' and health care professionals' views of their nursing-experience and nursing consultation in rehabilitation-a qualitative study

Verena Witzig-Brändli, Cordula Lange, Sabine Gschwend, Myrta Kohler, Verena Witzig-Brändli, Cordula Lange, Sabine Gschwend, Myrta Kohler

Abstract

Background: Nurses play a crucial role in the multidisciplinary team in the rehabilitation of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, little is known about patients' and health care professionals' (HCP) experiences (physicians, therapists) with nurses in rehabilitation. The aim of this qualitative study is (i) to describe the rehabilitation nursing care from the perspective of MS patients and HCPs and their view of a nursing consultations (ii) to elaborate similarities and differences of patients' and HCP's views.

Methods: We used a qualitative approach and selected the participants purposively. We conducted semi-structured individual MS patient (n = 15) and two focus groups interviews with HCPs (n = 8) in an inpatient rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland. We analysed the data using a structuring content analysis approach. First, we analysed patients' and HCPs' perspectives separately. Afterwards we elaborated similarities and differences descriptively.

Results: Main categories of patients' perspectives were "need for nursing care" and "relationship between nurses and MS patient". MS patients have mentioned the following points according to a nursing consultation: (i) nurses as advocates, (ii) involvement of relatives (iii) peer groups (iv) contact person. "Nurses in their scope of practice", "nurses as a part of the multidisciplinary team" and "the specifications in the treatment of MS patients" were main categories of HCPs' perspective. MS patients and HCPs demonstrated similarly the importance to have a nurse as a contact person in the multidisciplinary team and the need to integrate a nurse-led peer group in a nursing consultation. While HCPs prefer that relative always be included in nursing consultations, patients provided reasons when inclusion was not desirable.

Conclusion: The results indicate that continuity in the nursing care for MS patients could contribute to a trusting nurse-patient relationship. This facilitates nurses to create a deeper understanding of MS patients and their needs in daily rehabilitation. The need for MS patients to share their concerns and receive scientifically proven knowledge from peers could addressed with a nurse-led peer group.

Keywords: Caring; Health care professionals’ team's perspective; Multiple sclerosis; Nurse experience; Nursing consultation; Patient perspective; Qualitative research; Rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, Kaye W, Leray E, Marrie RA, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler. 2020;26(14):1816–21. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841.
    1. Koch-Henriksen N, Sørensen PS. The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(5):520–32. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70064-8.
    1. Magyari M, Sorensen PS. The changing course of multiple sclerosis: rising incidence, change in geographic distribution, disease course, and prognosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32(3):320–326. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000695.
    1. Hunter SF. Overview and diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(6 Suppl):s141–s150.
    1. Melcon MO, Correale J, Melcon CM. Is it time for a new global classification of multiple sclerosis? Journal of the neurological sciences 2014; 344(1):171–81. Available from: URL: .
    1. Vaughn, Jakimovski D, Kavak KS, Ramanathan M, Benedict RHB, Zivadinov R, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of multiple sclerosis in elderly populations. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(6):329–42. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0183-3.
    1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1622–1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1.
    1. Amatya B, Khan F, Galea M. Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD012732-CD012732. Available from: URL: .
    1. Kesselring J, Beer S. Symptomatic therapy, and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(10):643–652. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70193-9.
    1. Vaughn S, Mauk KL, Jacelon CS, Larsen PD, Rye J, Wintersgill W, et al. The Competency Model for Professional Rehabilitation Nursing. Rehabil Nurs. 2016;41(1):33–44. doi: 10.1002/rnj.225.
    1. Gutenbrunner C, Stievano A, Nugraha B, Stewart D, Catton H. Nursing–a core element of rehabilitation. Int Nurs Rev. 2021;69:13–19. doi: 10.1111/inr.12661.
    1. Suter-Riederer S, MahrerImhof R, Gabriel C, Kesselring J, Schnepp W, Imhof L. Consenting on principles of rehabilitation nursing care: a Delphi study. Rehabil Nurs. 2018;43(6):E35–E41. doi: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000111.
    1. Burke T, Dishon S, McEwan L, Smrtka J. The evolving role of the multiple sclerosis nurse: an international perspective. Int J MS Care. 2011;13(3):105–112. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073-13.3.105.
    1. Feicke J, Spörhase U, Köhler J, Busch C, Wirtz M. A multicenter, prospective, quasi-experimental evaluation study of a patient education program to foster multiple sclerosis self-management competencies. 2014;97(3):361-9.10.1002/central/CN-01254527/full.
    1. Imhof L, Suter-Riederer S, Kesselring J. Effects of Mobility-Enhancing Nursing Intervention in Patients with MS, and Stroke: Randomised Controlled Trial. Int Scholarly Res Notices. 2015:1–6. Available from: URL: .
    1. Köpke S, Kasper J, Flachenecker P, Meißner H, Brandt A, Hauptmann B, et al. Patient education programme on immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis (PEPIMS): a controlled rater-blinded study. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(2):250–261. doi: 10.1177/0269215516639734.
    1. Roman C, Menning K. Treatment and disease management of multiple sclerosis patients: a review for nurse practitioners. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(10):629–638. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12514.
    1. Forbes A, While A, Mathes L, Griffiths P. Evaluation of a MS Specialist Nurse Programme. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(8):985–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.019.
    1. Meehan M, Doody O. The role of the clinical nurse specialist multiple sclerosis, the patients’ and families’ and carers’ perspective: an integrative review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;39:101918. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101918.
    1. While A, Forbes A, Ullman R, Mathes L. The role of specialist and general nurses working with people with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(18):2635–2648. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02459.x.
    1. Egger B, Müller M, Bigler S, Spirig R. Bedürfnisse von Menschen, die an Multipler Sklerose leiden: die Perspektiven von erkrankten Personen und ihren nächsten Angehörigen in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz. Pflege. 2012;25(5):329. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000229.
    1. Weilenmann M, Händler-Schuster D, Petry H, Zanolari D, Schmid-Mohler G, Beckmann S. Patient satisfaction with the quality of counseling provided by advanced practice nurses specialized in multiple sclerosis: a quantitative analysis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2021;53(2):99–103.
    1. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>;2-G.
    1. Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-52.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
    1. Brenner R, Witzig-Brändli V, Vetsch J, Kohler M. Nursing interventions focusing on self-efficacy of patients with Multiple Sclerosis in rehabilitation - a systematic review. Int J MS Care. 2022;24(4):189–198. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-166.
    1. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehab. 1986;1(3):59–74. doi: 10.1097/00013614-198604000-00007.
    1. Beck CT. Routledge international handbook of qualitative nursing research. 1. New York: Routledge; 2013.
    1. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: Sage; 2018.
    1. Kallio H, Pietilä A-M, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(12):2954–2965. doi: 10.1111/jan.13031.
    1. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz; 2015. Available from: URL: .
    1. Schreier M. Ways of doing qualitative content analysis: disentangling terms and terminologies. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2014;1(15).
    1. MAXQDA . Software für qualitative Datenanalyse. <VERBI Software. Consult. Berlin: Sozialforschung GmbH; 2020.
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Program Eval. 1986;1986(30):73–84. doi: 10.1002/ev.1427.
    1. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444–1452. doi: 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444.
    1. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehab. 1986;1(3):59–74. doi: 10.1097/00013614-198604000-00007.
    1. Gillen G, editor. Cognitive and Perceptual Rehabilitation. Saint Louis: Mosby; 2009.
    1. Birkhäuer J, Gaab J, Kossowsky J, Hasler S, Krummenacher P, Werner C, et al. Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988.
    1. Roulin M-J, Jonniaux S, Guisado H, Séchaud L. Perceptions of inpatients and nurses towards the importance of nurses' caring behaviours in rehabilitation: a comparative study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020;26(4):e12835. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12835.
    1. Nursing Management of the Patient with Multiple Sclerosis [cited 1 Apr 2021\]. Available from: URL: .
    1. Foster M, Allen S, Fleming J. Unmet health and rehabilitation needs of people with long-term neurological conditions in Queensland, Australia. Health Soc Care Community. 2015;23(3):292–303. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12146.
    1. Galushko M, Golla H, Strupp J, Karbach U, Kaiser C, Ernstmann N, et al. Unmet needs of patients feeling severely affected by multiple sclerosis in Germany: a qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(3):274–81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0497.
    1. Appleton D, Robertson N, Mitchell L, Lesley R. Our disease: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the experiences of spousal/partner caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(4):1262–1278. doi: 10.1111/scs.12601.
    1. Corry M, While A. The needs of carers of people with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23(3):569–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00645.x.
    1. Salminen A-L, Kanelisto KJ, Karhula ME. What components of rehabilitation are helpful from the perspective of individuals with multiple sclerosis? Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(23):1983–1989. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.885092.
    1. JadidMilani M, Ashktorab T, AbedSaeedi Z, AlaviMajd H. The impact of self-transcendence on physical health status promotion in multiple sclerosis patients attending peer support groups. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21(6):725–732. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12186.
    1. BiglarChopoghlou S, Hanifi N, Varjoshani NJ. A comparative study of uncertainty and coping strategies of patients with multiple sclerosis for members and nonmembers in peer groups. Health Care Women Int. 2020;41(3):354–367. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2019.1621317.
    1. Costa DC, Sà MJ, Calheiros JM. The effect of social support on the quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis. Arq Neuropsiquiatrie. 2012;70(2):108–13. doi: 10.1590/S0004-282X2012000200007.
    1. McCabe MP, Ebacioni KJ, Simmons R, McDonald E, Melton L. Unmet education, psychological and peer support needs of people with multiple sclerosis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(1):82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.05.010.
    1. Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2013;47(4):2025–2047. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe