Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies

Brian L Edlow, Jan Claassen, Nicholas D Schiff, David M Greer, Brian L Edlow, Jan Claassen, Nicholas D Schiff, David M Greer

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made over the past two decades in detecting, predicting and promoting recovery of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by severe brain injuries. Advanced neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques have revealed new insights into the biological mechanisms underlying recovery of consciousness and have enabled the identification of preserved brain networks in patients who seem unresponsive, thus raising hope for more accurate diagnosis and prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that covert consciousness, or cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), is present in up to 15-20% of patients with DoC and that detection of CMD in the intensive care unit can predict functional recovery at 1 year post injury. Although fundamental questions remain about which patients with DoC have the potential for recovery, novel pharmacological and electrophysiological therapies have shown the potential to reactivate injured neural networks and promote re-emergence of consciousness. In this Review, we focus on mechanisms of recovery from DoC in the acute and subacute-to-chronic stages, and we discuss recent progress in detecting and predicting recovery of consciousness. We also describe the developments in pharmacological and electrophysiological therapies that are creating new opportunities to improve the lives of patients with DoC.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1. Multidimensional assessment of consciousness.
Fig. 1. Multidimensional assessment of consciousness.
During recovery from coma, patients are evaluated for overt cognition and motor function using the Coma Recovery Scale — Revised (CRS-R). This evaluation enables the classification of patients into the groups illustrated in green, with the exception of patients who emerge from a minimally conscious state with language (MCS+) to a confusional state, in whom the Confusion Assessment Protocol (CAP) is used to differentiate between a confusional state, cognitive dysfunction and full recovery. In patients with no behavioural evidence of language function, functional MRI (fMRI) or EEG evidence of command-following (active) indicates cognitive motor dissociation, fMRI or EEG responses within an association cortex during language or music stimuli (passive) indicate covert cortical processing, and an absence of fMRI or EEG responses indicates a true negative fMRI/EEG classification. Patients with behavioural evidence of language are classified as false negatives if there are no fMRI or EEG responses, and as true positives if there are fMRI and EEG responses. CLIS, complete locked-in syndrome; LIS, locked-in syndrome; MCS–, minimally conscious state without language; VS/UWS, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. *Patients with LIS are identified by the presence of consistent purposeful movements, typically vertical eye movements, and a reliable movement-based communication system. Patients with LIS who demonstrate inconsistent movements would not be distinguishable from patients with CLIS, cognitive dysfunction, confusional state or MCS. Some patients with LIS are able to communicate via assistive communication devices. Adapted with permission from ref., OUP.
Fig. 2. Diffusion tractography detects acute disconnection…
Fig. 2. Diffusion tractography detects acute disconnection of the ascending arousal network.
a,b | Post-mortem diffusion tractography scans showing that the brainstem and thalamic nuclei of the ascending arousal network are extensively interconnected in a control individual (part a), but completely disconnected in a patient who died in the intensive care unit 3 days after a coma-inducing severe traumatic brain injury (part b). Scans shown from a posterior perspective, with fibre tracts colour-coded according to the brainstem nucleus from which they originate: purple, pedunculotegmental nucleus (PTg); yellow, parabrachial complex (PBC); turquoise, dorsal raphe (DR); dark blue, locus coeruleus (LC); green, median raphe (MnR); and pink, ventral tegmental area (VTA). Fibre tracts in the control, but not in the patient with coma, connect with the intralaminar nuclei (central lateral nuclei (CL) and centromedian/parafascicular complex (CEM/Pf)) and the reticular nuclei (Ret) of the thalamus. Two midbrain haemorrhages (Haem) in the patient with coma are rendered in red. c,d | Ascending arousal network connectograms for the control (part c) and the patient with coma (part d). Brainstem nuclei are listed on the outside of the circle, and their subcortical targets are shown on the inside of the circle. Lines indicate connections between network nodes, with line thickness being proportional to the number of tracts visualized. Brainstem connections with thalamic and basal forebrain nuclei were disrupted in the patient with coma (part d), but connections with the hypothalamus were partially preserved. BNM/SI, nucleus basalis of Meynert/substantia innominata; DBB, diagonal band of Broca; IL, intralaminar nuclei of thalamus; LDTg, laterodorsal tegmental nucleus; LHA, lateral hypothalamic area; mRt, mesencephalic reticular formation; PAG, periaqueductal grey; PnO, pontis oralis; PV, paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus; SUM, supramammillary nucleus of the hypothalamus; TM, tuberomammillary nucleus of the hypothalamus. Parts a and b reprinted with permission from ref., OUP.
Fig. 3. Mapping loss of consciousness to…
Fig. 3. Mapping loss of consciousness to a common brain network using the human connectome.
A novel technique termed ‘lesion network mapping’ was used to test whether lesions producing prolonged loss of consciousness (LoC) map to a distributed brain network or a single brain region. a | A sample of 171 individuals who experienced penetrating traumatic brain injuries and underwent head CT was classified into three groups: no LoC, brief (<1 day) LoC and prolonged (>1 day) LoC. Lesions were transformed onto a common brain template. Representative lesions from three individuals are shown in red. b | The brain regions functionally connected to each lesion location were identified using a database of 1,000 resting state functional MRI scans from healthy controls. c | Using voxel-wise ordinal logistic regression, the investigators determined that a lesion’s connectivity with a specific region of the brainstem tegmentum (blue) was the strongest predictor of LoC. d | The network of cortical regions functionally connected to the identified brainstem region (blue) visualized alongside representative lesions (semi-transparent red). The lesions that caused no LoC show no overlap with the functional connectivity map whereas the lesions that caused prolonged LoC do overlap with the functional connectivity map. These findings suggest that lesions causing prolonged LoC injure a widely distributed brain network that is functionally connected to the brainstem tegmentum, known to contain consciousness-promoting arousal nuclei. Adapted from ref., CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Fig. 4. Task-based functional MRI detects cognitive…
Fig. 4. Task-based functional MRI detects cognitive motor dissociation in the intensive care unit.
Functional MRI (fMRI) results for language, music and motor imagery paradigms for a healthy individual and patients with a broad range of behavioural diagnoses after acute severe traumatic brain injury. The second row shows scans from a patient with a behavioural diagnosis of vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) but fMRI evidence of command-following, resulting in an fMRI diagnosis of cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). The third row shows scans from a patient with a behavioural diagnosis of minimally conscious state without language (MCS–) but fMRI evidence of association cortex activation to language and music stimuli, resulting in an fMRI diagnosis of covert cortical processing. The patients diagnosed with CMD, covert cortical processing and coma all recovered consciousness, communication and functional independence, highlighting the prognostic limitations and confounders associated with fMRI in the intensive care unit (for example, the comatose patient was on a propofol drip during the scan). Thus, a negative fMRI result should not be interpreted as a reliable indicator of poor outcome. fMRI data are shown as Z-statistic images thresholded at cluster-corrected Z scores of 3.1 (inset colour bar) and superimposed upon T1-weighted axial images. CRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale — Revised. Reprinted with permission from ref., OUP.
Fig. 5. EEG detection of cognitive motor…
Fig. 5. EEG detection of cognitive motor dissociation in the intensive care unit predicts 1-year functional recovery.
Task-based EEG data were acquired in a sample of 104 patients with severe brain injuries of various aetiologies in the intensive care unit. a | EEG was recorded for 10 s following alternating instructions of “keep opening and closing your right hand” (green) and “stop opening and closing your right hand” (red). b | Power spectral density (PSD) analysis was applied to the EEG recorded from each electrode in four frequency bands: delta (1–3 Hz), theta (4–7 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz) and beta (14–30 Hz). c | Resulting features were used to train and test a machine learning algorithm (support vector machine). Classification performance for a given recording was assessed as the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Decoding prediction is represented on the y axis, reflecting the EEG response corresponding to a “keep moving” or a “stop moving” instruction. Lines represent group averages of the decoding prediction curves of healthy volunteers and patients with or without cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). This study found that intensive care unit patients with acute CMD had a higher likelihood of functional recovery at 1 year post injury than patients without CMD. Reprinted from ref., Claassen, J. et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. 380, 2497–2505. Copyright © (2019) Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission.

References

    1. Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:99–114.
    1. Giacino JT, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018;91:450–460.
    1. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84.
    1. Laureys S, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8:68.
    1. Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972;1:734–737.
    1. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1) N. Engl. J. Med. 1994;330:1499–1508.
    1. Giacino JT, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:349–353.
    1. Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Moonen G, Laureys S. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J. Neurol. 2011;258:1373–1384.
    1. Thibaut A, Bodien YG, Laureys S, Giacino JT. Minimally conscious state “plus”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery. J. Neurol. 2020;267:1245–1254.
    1. Giacino JT, et al. Behavioral recovery and early decision making in patients with prolonged disturbance in consciousness after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2020;37:357–365.
    1. Schiff ND. Cognitive motor dissociation following severe brain injuries. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1413–1415.
    1. Hemphill JC, 3rd, White DB. Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. 2009;27:27–37.
    1. Leblanc G, et al. Incidence and impact of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in clinical trials of severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Clin. Trials. 2018;15:398–412.
    1. Elmer J, et al. Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;102:127–135.
    1. Posner, J. B., Saper, C. B., Schiff, N. D. & Claassen, J. Plum and Posner’s Diagnosis and Treatment of Stupor and Coma 5th edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).
    1. Parvizi J, Damasio AR. Neuroanatomical correlates of brainstem coma. Brain. 2003;126:1524–1536.
    1. Fischer DB, et al. A human brain network derived from coma-causing brainstem lesions. Neurology. 2016;87:2427–2434.
    1. Schiff ND. Resolving the role of the paramedian thalamus in forebrain arousal mechanisms. Ann. Neurol. 2018;84:812–813.
    1. Steriade M, Nunez A, Amzica F. A novel slow (<1 Hz) oscillation of neocortical neurons in vivo: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing components. J. Neurosci. 1993;13:3252–3265.
    1. Timofeev I, Grenier F, Bazhenov M, Sejnowski TJ, Steriade M. Origin of slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs. Cereb. Cortex. 2000;10:1185–1199.
    1. Gold L, Lauritzen M. Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:7699–7704.
    1. Timofeev I, Grenier F, Steriade M. Disfacilitation and active inhibition in the neocortex during the natural sleep–wake cycle: an intracellular study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:1924–1929.
    1. Blumenfeld H, et al. Ictal neocortical slowing in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2004;63:1015–1021.
    1. Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:2638–2650.
    1. Fridman EA, Beattie BJ, Broft A, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Regional cerebral metabolic patterns demonstrate the role of anterior forebrain mesocircuit dysfunction in the severely injured brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:6473–6478.
    1. Stender J, et al. The minimal energetic requirement of sustained awareness after brain injury. Curr. Biol. 2016;26:1494–1499.
    1. Schiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:1–9.
    1. Laureys S, Schiff ND. Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging. NeuroImage. 2012;61:478–491.
    1. Williams ST, et al. Common resting brain dynamics indicate a possible mechanism underlying zolpidem response in severe brain injury. eLife. 2013;2:e01157.
    1. Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain. 2010;133:161–171.
    1. Wu X, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity patterns predict consciousness level and recovery outcome in acquired brain injury. J. Neurosci. 2015;35:12932–12946.
    1. Buckner RL, DiNicola LM. The brain’s default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019;20:593–608.
    1. Raichle ME, Snyder AZ. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. NeuroImage. 2007;37:1083–1090.
    1. Seeley WW, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:2349–2356.
    1. Thibaut A, et al. Clinical response to tDCS depends on residual brain metabolism and grey matter integrity in patients with minimally conscious state. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:1116–1123.
    1. Threlkeld ZD, et al. Functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex. 2018;106:299–308.
    1. Lant ND, Gonzalez-Lara LE, Owen AM, Fernandez-Espejo D. Relationship between the anterior forebrain mesocircuit and the default mode network in the structural bases of disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;10:27–35.
    1. Redinbaugh MJ, et al. Thalamus modulates consciousness via layer-specific control of cortex. Neuron. 2020;106:66–75.e12.
    1. Schiff ND. Central lateral thalamic nucleus stimulation awakens cortex via modulation of cross-regional, laminar-specific activity during general anesthesia. Neuron. 2020;106:1–3.
    1. Schiff ND. Central thalamic contributions to arousal regulation and neurological disorders of consciousness. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1129:105–118.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2012;71:531–546.
    1. Snider SB, et al. Disruption of the ascending arousal network in acute traumatic disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2019;93:e1281–e1287.
    1. Steriade M. Arousal: revisiting the reticular activating system. Science. 1996;272:225–226.
    1. Moruzzi G, Magoun HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1949;1:455–473.
    1. Berlingeri M, Magnani FG, Salvato G, Rosanova M, Bottini G. Neuroimaging studies on disorders of consciousness: a meta-analytic evaluation. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:516.
    1. Rudolph M, Pelletier JG, Pare D, Destexhe A. Characterization of synaptic conductances and integrative properties during electrically induced EEG-activated states in neocortical neurons in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2805–2821.
    1. Schiff, N. D. in Brain Function and Responsiveness in Disorders of Consciousness Ch. 15 (eds Monti, M. M. & Sannita, W. G.) 195–204 (Springer International, 2016).
    1. Schiff ND, Nauvel T, Victor JD. Large-scale brain dynamics in disorders of consciousness. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014;25:7–14.
    1. Becker DA, et al. A major miss in prognostication after cardiac arrest: burst suppression and brain healing. Epilepsy Behav. Case Rep. 2017;7:1–5.
    1. Ching S, Purdon PL, Vijayan S, Kopell NJ, Brown EN. A neurophysiological–metabolic model for burst suppression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:3095–3100.
    1. Silva LR, Amitai Y, Connors BW. Intrinsic oscillations of neocortex generated by layer 5 pyramidal neurons. Science. 1991;251:432–435.
    1. Llinas RR, Ribary U, Jeanmonod D, Kronberg E, Mitra PP. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: a neurological and neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by magnetoencephalography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:15222–15227.
    1. Llinas R, Urbano FJ, Leznik E, Ramirez RR, van Marle HJ. Rhythmic and dysrhythmic thalamocortical dynamics: GABA systems and the edge effect. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:325–333.
    1. Drover JD, Schiff ND. A method for decomposing multivariate time series into a causal hierarchy within specific frequency bands. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2018;45:59–82.
    1. Steriade M, Timofeev I, Grenier F. Natural waking and sleep states: a view from inside neocortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2001;85:1969–1985.
    1. Forgacs PB, et al. Dynamic regimes of neocortical activity linked to corticothalamic integrity correlate with outcomes in acute anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Ann. Clin. Transl Neurol. 2017;4:119–129.
    1. Claassen J, et al. Bedside quantitative electroencephalography improves assessment of consciousness in comatose subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Ann. Neurol. 2016;80:541–553.
    1. Shah SA, et al. Executive attention deficits after traumatic brain injury reflect impaired recruitment of resources. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;14:233–241.
    1. Shah SA, et al. Focal electroencephalographic changes index post-traumatic confusion and outcome. J. Neurotrauma. 2017;34:2691–2699.
    1. Chatelle C, et al. Changes in cerebral metabolism in patients with a minimally conscious state responding to zolpidem. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014;8:917.
    1. Destexhe A, Rudolph M, Pare D. The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003;4:739–751.
    1. Dikmen SS, et al. Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. J. Head. Trauma. Rehabil. 2009;24:430–438.
    1. Newcombe VF, et al. Aetiological differences in neuroanatomy of the vegetative state: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and functional implications. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2010;81:552–561.
    1. Hammond FM, et al. Disorders of consciousness due to traumatic brain injury: functional status ten years post-injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2019;36:1136–1146.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Unexpected recovery of function after severe traumatic brain injury: the limits of early neuroimaging-based outcome prediction. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19:364–375.
    1. Edlow BL, Threlkeld ZD, Fehnel KP, Bodien YG. Recovery of functional independence after traumatic transtentorial herniation with Duret hemorrhages. Front. Neurol. 2019;10:1077.
    1. Muccio CF, et al. Reversible post-traumatic bilateral extensive restricted diffusion of the brain. A case study and review of the literature. Brain Inj. 2009;23:466–472.
    1. Stiver SI, Gean AD, Manley GT. Survival with good outcome after cerebral herniation and Duret hemorrhage caused by traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 2009;110:1242–1246.
    1. Wijdicks EF, et al. Recommendations for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1222–1238.
    1. Lord AS, Gilmore E, Choi HA, Mayer SA, VISTA-ICH Collaboration. Time course and predictors of neurological deterioration after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015;46:647–652.
    1. Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL. Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38:2315–2321.
    1. Wijdicks EF, et al. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2006;67:203–210.
    1. Hemphill JC, 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:891–897.
    1. Turgeon AF, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ. 2011;183:1581–1588.
    1. Peberdy MA, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003;58:297–308.
    1. Izzy S, Compton R, Carandang R, Hall W, Muehlschlegel S. Self-fulfilling prophecies through withdrawal of care: do they exist in traumatic brain injury, too? Neurocrit Care. 2013;19:347–363.
    1. Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann. Neurol. 2005;58:585–593.
    1. Foo CC, Loan JJM, Brennan PM. The relationship of the FOUR score to patient outcome: a systematic review. J. Neurotrauma. 2019;36:2469–2483.
    1. Teasdale GM, et al. A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1988;51:1457.
    1. de Oliveira Manoel AL, et al. Functional outcome after poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-center study and systematic literature review. Neurocrit Care. 2016;25:338–350.
    1. Rittenberger JC, Tisherman SA, Holm MB, Guyette FX, Callaway CW. An early, novel illness severity score to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1399–1404.
    1. Coppler PJ, et al. Validation of the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category illness severity score. Resuscitation. 2015;89:86–92.
    1. Steyerberg EW, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e165.
    1. Suys T, et al. Automated quantitative pupillometry for the prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21:300–308.
    1. Solari D, et al. Early prediction of coma recovery after cardiac arrest with blinded pupillometry. Ann. Neurol. 2017;81:804–810.
    1. Oddo M, et al. Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:2102–2111.
    1. Maciel CB, et al. Corneal reflex testing in the evaluation of a comatose patient: an ode to precise semiology and examination skills. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33:399–404.
    1. Acosta MC, Tan ME, Belmonte C, Gallar J. Sensations evoked by selective mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimulation of the conjunctiva and cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001;42:2063–2067.
    1. Greer DM, et al. Clinical examination for outcome prediction in nontraumatic coma. Crit. Care Med. 2012;40:1150–1156.
    1. Nolan JP, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2015 guidelines for post-resuscitation care. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:2039–2056.
    1. Greer DM, Rosenthal ES, Wu O. Neuroprognostication of hypoxic–ischaemic coma in the therapeutic hypothermia era. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:190–203.
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale — Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004;85:2020–2029.
    1. Schnakers C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35.
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a comparison of clinical features and functional outcome. J. Head. Trauma. Rehabil. 1997;12:36–51.
    1. Claassen J, et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;380:2497–2505.
    1. Faugeras F, et al. Survival and consciousness recovery are better in the minimally conscious state than in the vegetative state. Brain Inj. 2018;32:72–77.
    1. Fins, J. J. Rights Come to Mind: Brain Injury, Ethics, and the Struggle for Consciousness (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
    1. Metter RB, Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, Callaway CW. Association between a quantitative CT scan measure of brain edema and outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1180–1185.
    1. Claassen J, et al. Global cerebral edema after subarachnoid hemorrhage: frequency, predictors, and impact on outcome. Stroke. 2002;33:1225–1232.
    1. Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, Dunn VD. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1988;150:673–682.
    1. Skandsen T, et al. Prevalence and impact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: a cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1-year outcome. J. Neurosurg. 2010;113:556–563.
    1. Wu O, et al. Comatose patients with cardiac arrest: predicting clinical outcome with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 2009;252:173–181.
    1. Wijman CA, et al. Prognostic value of brain diffusion-weighted imaging after cardiac arrest. Ann. Neurol. 2009;65:394–402.
    1. Greer DM, et al. Hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in cardiac arrest are associated with poor outcome. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2013;22:899–905.
    1. Tong KA, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Ann. Neurol. 2004;56:36–50.
    1. Yanagawa Y, et al. A quantitative analysis of head injury using T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging. J. Trauma. 2000;49:272–277.
    1. Griffin AD, et al. Traumatic microbleeds suggest vascular injury and predict disability in traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2019;142:3550–3564.
    1. Izzy S, et al. Revisiting grade 3 diffuse axonal injury: not all brainstem microbleeds are prognostically equal. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27:199–207.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Disconnection of the ascending arousal system in traumatic coma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2013;72:505–523.
    1. McNab JA, et al. The human connectome project and beyond: initial applications of 300 mT/m gradients. NeuroImage. 2013;80:234–245.
    1. Smith DH, Hicks R, Povlishock JT. Therapy development for diffuse axonal injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2013;30:307–323.
    1. Diaz-Arrastia R, et al. Pharmacotherapy of traumatic brain injury: state of the science and the road forward: report of the Department of Defense Neurotrauma Pharmacology Workgroup. J. Neurotrauma. 2014;31:135–158.
    1. Sair HI, et al. Early functional connectome integrity and 1-year recovery in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Radiology. 2018;287:247–255.
    1. Koenig MA, et al. MRI default mode network connectivity is associated with functional outcome after cardiopulmonary arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:348–357.
    1. Norton L, et al. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. Neurology. 2012;78:175–181.
    1. Pugin D, et al. Resting-state brain activity for early prediction outcome in postanoxic patients in a coma with indeterminate clinical prognosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020;41:1022–1030.
    1. Silva S, et al. Disruption of posteromedial large-scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology. 2015;85:2036–2044.
    1. Velly L, et al. Use of brain diffusion tensor imaging for the prediction of long-term neurological outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest: a multicentre, international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:317–326.
    1. Galanaud D, et al. Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:1300–1310.
    1. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. B. 1996;111:209–219.
    1. Wang JY, et al. Longitudinal changes of structural connectivity in traumatic axonal injury. Neurology. 2011;77:818–826.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in acute-to-subacute traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal analysis. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:2.
    1. Warner MA, et al. Assessing spatial relationships between axonal integrity, regional brain volumes, and neuropsychological outcomes after traumatic axonal injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2121–2130.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Personalized connectome mapping to guide targeted therapy and promote recovery of consciousness in the intensive care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33:364–375.
    1. Yue JK, et al. Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1831–1844.
    1. Maas AIR, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:987–1048.
    1. Haacke EM, et al. Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2010;32:516–543.
    1. Nichols TE, et al. Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nat. Neurosci. 2017;20:299–303.
    1. Fox MD. Mapping symptoms to brain networks with the human connectome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2237–2245.
    1. Crossley NA, et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain. 2014;137:2382–2395.
    1. Achard S, et al. Hubs of brain functional networks are radically reorganized in comatose patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:20608–20613.
    1. Sharp DJ, Scott G, Leech R. Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:156–166.
    1. Snider SB, et al. Cortical lesions causing loss of consciousness are anticorrelated with the dorsal brainstem. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2020;41:1520–1531.
    1. Thengone DJ, Voss HU, Fridman EA, Schiff ND. Local changes in network structure contribute to late communication recovery after severe brain injury. Sci. Transl Med. 2016;8:368re365.
    1. Voss HU, et al. Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116:2005–2011.
    1. Bodien YG, Chatelle C, Edlow BL. Functional networks in disorders of consciousness. Semin. Neurol. 2017;37:485–502.
    1. Kondziella D, et al. Functional MRI for assessment of the default mode network in acute brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27:401–406.
    1. Fischer D, et al. Intact brain network function in an unresponsive patient with COVID-19. Ann. Neurol. 2020;88:851–854.
    1. Comanducci A, et al. Basic and advanced neurophysiology in the prognostic and diagnostic evaluation of disorders of consciousness: review of an IFCNendorsed expert group. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131:2736–2765.
    1. Towne AR, et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology. 2000;54:340–345.
    1. Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, Emerson RG, Hirsch LJ. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology. 2004;62:1743–1748.
    1. Young GB, McLachlan RS, Kreeft JH, Demelo JD. An electroencephalographic classification for coma. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997;24:320–325.
    1. Husari, K. S., Johnson, E. L. & Ritzl, E. K. Acute and long-term outcomes of lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA) versus lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) in critically ill patients. Neurocrit. Care10.1007/s12028-020-01017-y (2020).
    1. Tabaeizadeh M, et al. Burden of epileptiform activity predicts discharge neurologic outcomes in severe acute ischemic stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32:697–706.
    1. Oddo M, Carrera E, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Hirsch LJ. Continuous electroencephalography in the medical intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37:2051–2056.
    1. De Marchis GM, et al. Seizure burden in subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with functional and cognitive outcome. Neurology. 2016;86:253–260.
    1. Claassen J, et al. Electrographic seizures and periodic discharges after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2007;69:1356–1365.
    1. Zafar SF, et al. Effect of epileptiform abnormality burden on neurologic outcome and antiepileptic drug management after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2018;129:2219–2227.
    1. Rossetti AO, Rabinstein AA, Oddo M. Neurological prognostication of outcome in patients in coma after cardiac arrest. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:597–609.
    1. Rossetti AO, et al. Electroencephalography predicts poor and good outcomes after cardiac arrest: a two-center study. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:e674–e682.
    1. Rossetti AO, Oddo M, Liaudet L, Kaplan PW. Predictors of awakening from postanoxic status epilepticus after therapeutic hypothermia. Neurology. 2009;72:744–749.
    1. Elmer J, et al. Clinically distinct electroencephalographic phenotypes of early myoclonus after cardiac arrest. Ann. Neurol. 2016;80:175–184.
    1. Bekinschtein TA, et al. Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:1672–1677.
    1. Amorim E, et al. Estimating the false positive rate of absent somatosensory evoked potentials in cardiac arrest prognostication. Crit. Care Med. 2018;46:e1213–e1221.
    1. Carter BG, Butt W. Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury. Crit. Care Med. 2001;29:178–186.
    1. Forgacs PB, et al. Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging-based evidence of command-following. Ann. Neurol. 2014;76:869–879.
    1. Estraneo A, et al. Standard EEG in diagnostic process of prolonged disorders of consciousness. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2016;127:2379–2385.
    1. Jorgensen EO, Holm S. The natural course of neurological recovery following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1998;36:111–122.
    1. Engemann DA, et al. Robust EEG-based cross-site and cross-protocol classification of states of consciousness. Brain. 2018;141:3179–3192.
    1. Sitt JD, et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain. 2014;137:2258–2270.
    1. Gosseries O, et al. Automated EEG entropy measurements in coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state. Funct. Neurol. 2011;26:25–30.
    1. Mikell CB, et al. Frontal networks associated with command following after hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:49–57.
    1. Streitberger KJ, et al. Neuron-specific enolase predicts poor outcome after cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management: a multicenter study on 1,053 patients. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:1145–1151.
    1. Mattsson N, et al. Serum Tau and neurological outcome in cardiac arrest. Ann. Neurol. 2017;82:665–675.
    1. Moseby-Knappe M, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain for prognosis of outcome after cardiac arrest. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:64–71.
    1. Owen AM, et al. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science. 2006;313:1402.
    1. Schnakers C, et al. Preserved covert cognition in noncommunicative patients with severe brain injury? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2015;29:308–317.
    1. Gosseries O, Zasler ND, Laureys S. Recent advances in disorders of consciousness: focus on the diagnosis. Brain Inj. 2014;28:1141–1150.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2017;140:2399–2414.
    1. Bodien YG, Giacino JT, Edlow BL. Functional MRI motor imagery tasks to detect command following in traumatic disorders of consciousness. Front. Neurol. 2017;8:688.
    1. Kondziella D, Friberg CK, Frokjaer VG, Fabricius M, Moller K. Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2016;87:485–492.
    1. Cruse D, et al. Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378:2088–2094.
    1. Bodien YG, Threlkeld ZD, Edlow BL. Default mode network dynamics in covert consciousness. Cortex. 2019;117:571–574.
    1. Goldfine AM, et al. Reanalysis of “Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study”. Lancet. 2013;381:289–291.
    1. Chatelle C, Spencer CA, Cash SS, Hochberg LR, Edlow BL. Feasibility of an EEG-based brain–computer interface in the intensive care unit. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2018;129:1519–1525.
    1. Rohaut B, Eliseyev A, Claassen J. Uncovering consciousness in unresponsive ICU patients: technical, medical and ethical considerations. Crit. Care. 2019;23:78.
    1. Menon DK, et al. Cortical processing in persistent vegetative state. Lancet. 1998;352:200.
    1. Schiff ND, Plum F. Cortical function in the persistent vegetative state. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999;3:43–44.
    1. Coleman MR, et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain. 2009;132:2541–2552.
    1. Fernandez-Espejo D, et al. Cerebral response to speech in vegetative and minimally conscious states after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008;22:882–890.
    1. Di HB, et al. Cerebral response to patient’s own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology. 2007;68:895–899.
    1. Kondziella D, et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;27:741–756.
    1. Braiman C, et al. Cortical response to the natural speech envelope correlates with neuroimaging evidence of cognition in severe brain injury. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:3833–3839.e3.
    1. Chatelle C, et al. EEG correlates of language function in traumatic disorders of consciousness. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33:449–457.
    1. Macdonald RL. Delayed neurological deterioration after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:44–58.
    1. Diringer MN, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:211–240.
    1. Bernard SA, et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:557–563.
    1. Nielsen N, et al. Targeted temperature management at 33 °C versus 36 °C after cardiac arrest. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:2197–2206.
    1. Lascarrou JB, et al. Targeted temperature management for cardiac arrest with nonshockable rhythm. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:2327–2337.
    1. Andrews PJ, et al. Hypothermia for intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:2403–2412.
    1. Cooper DJ, et al. Effect of early sustained prophylactic hypothermia on neurologic outcomes among patients with severe traumatic brain injury: the POLAR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:2211–2220.
    1. Clifton GL, et al. Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:556–563.
    1. Dietrich WD, Bramlett HM. Therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management in traumatic brain injury: clinical challenges for successful translation. Brain Res. 2016;1640:94–103.
    1. Hutchinson PJ, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1119–1130.
    1. Meythaler JM, Brunner RC, Johnson A, Novack TA. Amantadine to improve neurorecovery in traumatic brain injury-associated diffuse axonal injury: a pilot double-blind randomized trial. J. Head. Trauma. Rehabil. 2002;17:300–313.
    1. Ghalaenovi H, et al. The effects of amantadine on traumatic brain injury outcome: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Brain Inj. 2018;32:1050–1055.
    1. Barra ME, et al. Stimulant therapy in acute traumatic brain injury: prescribing patterns and adverse event rates at 2 Level 1 trauma centers. J. Intensive. Care Med. 2020;35:11196–1202.
    1. Alkhachroum A, et al. EEG to detect early recovery of consciousness in amantadine-treated acute brain injury patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2020;91:675–676.
    1. Monti MM, Schnakers C, Korb AS, Bystritsky A, Vespa PM. Non-invasive ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: a first-in-man report. Brain Stimul. 2016;9:940–941.
    1. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force, et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2010;91:1795–1813.
    1. Wannez S, et al. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 2017;81:883–889.
    1. Pincherle A, et al. Motor behavior unmasks residual cognition in disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 2019;85:443–447.
    1. Johr J, et al. Recovery in cognitive motor dissociation after severe brain injury: a cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0228474.
    1. Estraneo A, et al. Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology. 2010;75:239–245.
    1. Giacino JT, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018;99:1699–1709.
    1. Laureys S, et al. Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. NeuroImage. 1999;9:377–382.
    1. Laureys S, et al. Restoration of thalamocortical connectivity after recovery from persistent vegetative state. Lancet. 2000;355:1790–1791.
    1. Owen AM, et al. Residual auditory function in persistent vegetative state: a combined PET and fMRI study. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2005;15:290–306.
    1. Sharp DJ, et al. Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2011;134:2233–2247.
    1. Hillary FG, et al. Changes in resting connectivity during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2011;82:115–123.
    1. Bonnelle V, et al. Default mode network connectivity predicts sustained attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:13442–13451.
    1. Bonnelle V, et al. Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:4690–4695.
    1. Cauda F, et al. Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2009;80:429–431.
    1. Soddu A, et al. Identifying the default-mode component in spatial IC analyses of patients with disorders of consciousness. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012;33:778–796.
    1. Demertzi A, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain. 2015;138:2619–2631.
    1. Demertzi A, et al. Multiple fMRI system-level baseline connectivity is disrupted in patients with consciousness alterations. Cortex. 2014;52:35–46.
    1. Qin P, et al. How are different neural networks related to consciousness? Ann. Neurol. 2015;78:594–605.
    1. Song M, et al. Prognostication of chronic disorders of consciousness using brain functional networks and clinical characteristics. eLife. 2018;7:e36173.
    1. Fernandez-Espejo D, et al. A role for the default mode network in the bases of disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 2012;72:335–343.
    1. Golland Y, et al. Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. Cereb. Cortex. 2007;17:766–777.
    1. Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:700–711.
    1. Fox MD, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9673–9678.
    1. Demertzi A, et al. Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaat7603.
    1. Brooks JC, Faull OK, Pattinson KT, Jenkinson M. Physiological noise in brainstem FMRI. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013;7:623.
    1. Beissner F, Schumann A, Brunn F, Eisentrager D, Bar KJ. Advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brainstem. NeuroImage. 2014;86:91–98.
    1. Bianciardi M, et al. In vivo functional connectome of human brainstem nuclei of the ascending arousal, autonomic, and motor systems by high spatial resolution 7-Tesla fMRI. MAGMA. 2016;29:451–462.
    1. Bar KJ, et al. Functional connectivity and network analysis of midbrain and brainstem nuclei. NeuroImage. 2016;134:53–63.
    1. Curley WH, Forgacs PB, Voss HU, Conte MM, Schiff ND. Characterization of EEG signals revealing covert cognition in the injured brain. Brain. 2018;141:1404–1421.
    1. Rosanova M, et al. Sleep-like cortical OFF-periods disrupt causality and complexity in the brain of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4427.
    1. Arnaldi D, et al. The prognostic value of sleep patterns in disorders of consciousness in the sub-acute phase. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2016;127:1445–1451.
    1. Kang XG, et al. Development of a simple score to predict outcome for unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Crit. Care. 2014;18:R37.
    1. Chennu S, et al. Brain networks predict metabolism, diagnosis and prognosis at the bedside in disorders of consciousness. Brain. 2017;140:2120–2132.
    1. Schomer, D. L. & Lopes da Silva, F. H. Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields 7th edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).
    1. Boly M, et al. Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science. 2011;332:858–862.
    1. Kotchoubey B, et al. Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2441–2453.
    1. Cavinato M, et al. Post-acute P300 predicts recovery of consciousness from traumatic vegetative state. Brain Inj. 2009;23:973–980.
    1. Daltrozzo J, Wioland N, Mutschler V, Kotchoubey B. Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: a meta-analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007;118:606–614.
    1. Steppacher I, et al. N400 predicts recovery from disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 2013;73:594–602.
    1. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ. The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009;120:453–463.
    1. Qin P, et al. Mismatch negativity to the patient’s own name in chronic disorders of consciousness. Neurosci. Lett. 2008;448:24–28.
    1. Tzovara A, et al. Prediction of awakening from hypothermic postanoxic coma based on auditory discrimination. Ann. Neurol. 2016;79:748–757.
    1. Raimondo F, et al. Brain–heart interactions reveal consciousness in noncommunicating patients. Ann. Neurol. 2017;82:578–591.
    1. O’Kelly J, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral responses to music therapy in vegetative and minimally conscious states. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013;7:884.
    1. Casali AG, et al. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci. Transl Med. 2013;5:198ra105.
    1. Casarotto S, et al. Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity. Ann. Neurol. 2016;80:718–729.
    1. Tononi G, Boly M, Massimini M, Koch C. Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016;17:450–461.
    1. Comolatti R, et al. A fast and general method to empirically estimate the complexity of brain responses to transcranial and intracranial stimulations. Brain Stimul. 2019;12:1280–1289.
    1. Belardinelli P, et al. Reproducibility in TMS–EEG studies: a call for data sharing, standard procedures and effective experimental control. Brain Stimul. 2019;12:787–790.
    1. Monti MM, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:579–589.
    1. Stender J, et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet. 2014;384:514–522.
    1. Goldfine AM, Victor JD, Conte MM, Bardin JC, Schiff ND. Determination of awareness in patients with severe brain injury using EEG power spectral analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011;122:2157–2168.
    1. Monti MM, Pickard JD, Owen AM. Visual cognition in disorders of consciousness: from V1 to top-down attention. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013;34:1245–1253.
    1. Bardin JC, et al. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain. 2011;134:769–782.
    1. Naci L, Owen AM. Making every word count for nonresponsive patients. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:1235–1241.
    1. Gibson RM, et al. Multiple tasks and neuroimaging modalities increase the likelihood of detecting covert awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014;8:950.
    1. Pisa FE, Biasutti E, Drigo D, Barbone F. The prevalence of vegetative and minimally conscious states: a systematic review and methodological appraisal. J. Head. Trauma. Rehabil. 2014;29:E23–E30.
    1. van Erp WS, et al. The vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Eur. J. Neurol. 2014;21:1361–1368.
    1. Di Perri C, et al. Neural correlates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimally conscious state: a cross-sectional multimodal imaging study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:830–842.
    1. Iotzov I, et al. Divergent neural responses to narrative speech in disorders of consciousness. Ann. Clin. Transl Neurol. 2017;4:784–792.
    1. Fridman EA, Schiff ND. Neuromodulation of the conscious state following severe brain injuries. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014;29:172–177.
    1. Giacino JT, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:819–826.
    1. Kim YW, Shin JC, An YS. Effects of methylphenidate on cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with impaired consciousness after acquired brain injury. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2009;32:335–339.
    1. Krimchansky BZ, Keren O, Sazbon L, Groswasser Z. Differential time and related appearance of signs, indicating improvement in the state of consciousness in vegetative state traumatic brain injury (VS-TBI) patients after initiation of dopamine treatment. Brain Inj. 2004;18:1099–1105.
    1. Passler MA, Riggs RV. Positive outcomes in traumatic brain injury-vegetative state: patients treated with bromocriptine. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001;82:311–315.
    1. Fridman EA, et al. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine for severe disorders of consciousness after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010;24:636–641.
    1. Manganotti P, et al. Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on brain excitability in severely brain-injured patients in minimally conscious or vegetative state. Brain Stimul. 2013;6:913–921.
    1. Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Ledoux D, Demertzi A, Laureys S. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2014;82:1112–1118.
    1. Corazzol M, et al. Restoring consciousness with vagus nerve stimulation. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:R994–R996.
    1. Pape TL, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of familiar auditory sensory training for acute severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:537–547.
    1. Schnakers C, Magee WL, Harris B. Sensory stimulation and music therapy programs for treating disorders of consciousness. Front. Psychol. 2016;7:297.
    1. Whyte J, et al. Zolpidem and restoration of consciousness. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014;93:101–113.
    1. Schiff ND, et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007;448:600–603.
    1. Provencio JJ, et al. The Curing Coma Campaign: framing initial scientific challenges—proceedings of the first Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33:1–12.
    1. Jenkins PO, et al. Stratifying drug treatment of cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury using neuroimaging. Brain. 2019;142:2367–2379.
    1. Fridman EA, Osborne JR, Mozley PD, Victor JD, Schiff ND. Presynaptic dopamine deficit in minimally conscious state patients following traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2019;142:1887–1893.
    1. Simon DW, et al. The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017;13:171–191.
    1. Shlosberg D, Benifla M, Kaufer D, Friedman A. Blood–brain barrier breakdown as a therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2010;6:393–403.
    1. Johnson VE, et al. Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist for years after a single traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2013;136:28–42.
    1. Scott G, et al. Minocycline reduces chronic microglial activation after brain trauma but increases neurodegeneration. Brain. 2018;141:459–471.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. Multimodal characterization of the late effects of traumatic brain injury: a methodological overview of the Late Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury project. J. Neurotrauma. 2018;35:1604–1619.
    1. Walker WC, et al. The Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) multi-centre observational study: description of study and characteristics of early participants. Brain Inj. 2016;30:1469–1480.
    1. Mez J, et al. Assessing clinicopathological correlation in chronic traumatic encephalopathy: rationale and methods for the UNITE study. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2015;7:62.
    1. Smith DH, Johnson VE, Trojanowski JQ, Stewart W. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy—confusion and controversies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019;15:179–183.
    1. Schiff, N. D. et al. in Fifth Annual Brain Initiative Investigators Meeting Abstract book [abstract S-124]. 250 (National Institute of Mental Health, 2019).
    1. Kotchoubey B, Pavlov YG. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between brain data and the outcome in disorders of consciousness. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:315.
    1. Edlow BL, Fins JJ. Assessment of covert consciousness in the intensive care unit: clinical and ethical considerations. J. Head. Trauma. Rehabil. 2018;33:424–434.
    1. Fins JJ, Bernat JL. Ethical, palliative, and policy considerations in disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2018;91:471–475.
    1. Cincotta M, et al. No effects of 20 Hz-rTMS of the primary motor cortex in vegetative state: a randomised, sham-controlled study. Cortex. 2015;71:368–376.
    1. Parvizi J, Damasio A. Consciousness and the brainstem. Cognition. 2001;79:135–160.
    1. Baker JL, et al. Robust modulation of arousal regulation, performance, and frontostriatal activity through central thalamic deep brain stimulation in healthy nonhuman primates. J. Neurophysiol. 2016;116:2383–2404.
    1. Liu J, et al. Frequency-selective control of cortical and subcortical networks by central thalamus. eLife. 2015;4:e09215.
    1. Bernander O, Douglas RJ, Martin KA, Koch C. Synaptic background activity influences spatiotemporal integration in single pyramidal cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:11569–11573.
    1. Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:600–614.
    1. Edlow BL, et al. 7 Tesla MRI of the ex vivo human brain at 100 micron resolution. Sci. Data. 2019;6:244.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe