Graded recruitment of pupil-linked neuromodulation by parametric stimulation of the vagus nerve

Zakir Mridha, Jan Willem de Gee, Yanchen Shi, Rayan Alkashgari, Justin Williams, Aaron Suminski, Matthew P Ward, Wenhao Zhang, Matthew James McGinley, Zakir Mridha, Jan Willem de Gee, Yanchen Shi, Rayan Alkashgari, Justin Williams, Aaron Suminski, Matthew P Ward, Wenhao Zhang, Matthew James McGinley

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is thought to affect neural activity by recruiting brain-wide release of neuromodulators. VNS is used in treatment-resistant epilepsy, and is increasingly being explored for other disorders, such as depression, and as a cognitive enhancer. However, the promise of VNS is only partially fulfilled due to a lack of mechanistic understanding of the transfer function between stimulation parameters and neuromodulatory response, together with a lack of biosensors for assaying stimulation efficacy in real time. We here develop an approach to VNS in head-fixed mice on a treadmill and show that pupil dilation is a reliable and convenient biosensor for VNS-evoked cortical neuromodulation. In an 'optimal' zone of stimulation parameters, current leakage and off-target effects are minimized and the extent of pupil dilation tracks VNS-evoked basal-forebrain cholinergic axon activity in neocortex. Thus, pupil dilation is a sensitive readout of the moment-by-moment, titratable effects of VNS on brain state.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), pupillometry,…
Fig. 1. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), pupillometry, and two-photon axonal GCaMP imaging in the auditory cortex of awake head-fixed mice.
A Bipolar VNS cuff design (top) and implantation on the left cervical vagus nerve (bottom). B VNS stimulation circuit diagram. Current is applied between the two cuff electrodes using an improved Howland current pump, and return current is measured across a 1-kOhm sensing resistor. The animal and current pump circuit were isolated from the ground (indicated at the bottom), except where noted. C VNS pulse waveforms and parameters. Biphasic pulses, separated by a gap of 50% interpulse interval, were delivered in trains lasting 10 s (top). Five pulse amplitudes, four pulse widths, and three pulse rates were combined to yield 60 unique VNS parameter combinations (bottom). D Photograph of a mouse undergoing pupillometry and VNS in the two-photon imaging setup. E Left: example video frame of the mouse’s eye, with fitted ellipses, overlaid on the pupil (red) and exposed eye area (purple). Right: 60 pupil-size time series (all parameter combinations mentioned in panel C) during an example session time-locked to each VNS train (thick line, session mean; thin lines, individual trains). Gray rectangles indicate 10-s window for each train of VNS pulses. F Left: example mean fluorescence intensity image from in vivo two-photon GCaMP6 imaging of cholinergic axons in the auditory cortex. Right: example axonal signal time series, aligned as in panel E. Same session as in panel E. G Walking speed time series from the same session as in panels E and F. H Full-session time series of pupil size (red), fluorescence (green), and walking speed (blue) from the same session as in EG. Narrow vertical gray rectangles indicate the time of each VNS train.
Fig. 2. Pupil dilation has a graded…
Fig. 2. Pupil dilation has a graded dependence on VNS parameters.
A VNS-evoked pupil response time courses separately for each pulse amplitude (left), width (middle), and rate (right), collapsed across two other stimulation parameters. Gray window, 10 s VNS train; red bars, the interval for VNS-evoked pupil response scalar measures (see “Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m. (across VNS events). B VNS-evoked pupil response measure for all 60 unique parameter combinations. Response magnitude is indicated by circle size and color. C VNS-evoked pupil response scalars plotted separately for pulse amplitudes and rates (binned across the width, left) and separately for pulse widths and rates (binned across amplitude, right). Colored lines, fitted log-logistic functions (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events; see Supplementary Fig. 2 for boxplot representations of the same data separately per animal). All panels: N = 45 repetitions for each unique parameter combination (before artifact rejection; “Methods”). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3. VNS-evoked pupil dilation requires an…
Fig. 3. VNS-evoked pupil dilation requires an intact nerve and localized current.
A VNS-evoked pupil response measures separately per pulse-charge (amplitude × width) and width, for 5 Hz trains (left), 10 Hz trains (middle), and 20 Hz trains (right). Colored lines, fitted log-logistic function (see “Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events). B Grid showing the width and amplitude parameter combinations that were collapsed into our 5 charge/pulse bins. C VNS-evoked pupil time courses, each trace is a charge/pulse bin and train rate. Gray window, VNS train; red bar, the interval for VNS-evoked pupil response scalar measures (see “Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m. (across VNS events). D VNS-evoked pupil response measures separately per charge/pulse bin and train rate. Colored lines, fitted log-logistic function (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events); stats, two-sided one-sample t test (tested against 0; ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, corrected for false discovery rate); blue, green, and brown backgrounds indicate no effects, optimal, and off-target pulse charges, respectively (“Methods”). E, F As C, D, but for double-cut nerve, ungrounded sessions. ADN = 45 repetitions for each unique parameter combination (before artifact rejection; “Methods”). E, FN = 24 repetitions for each unique parameter combination (before artifact rejection, “Methods”). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4. Graded VNS causes graded neuromodulation…
Fig. 4. Graded VNS causes graded neuromodulation recruitment.
A Left: example session mean fluorescence of cholinergic axons in layer 1 of the auditory cortex. Right: as left, but with an overlaid color map of VNS-evoked calcium responses (across all VNS stimulations, see “Methods”). This map was used as a session-wise region of interest for the analysis of calcium signal parameter dependence. This is a representative example of 12 independent repetitions (sessions). B VNS-evoked calcium response measures (“Methods”) for all 30 unique parameter combinations. Response magnitude is indicated by circle size and color. C VNS-evoked calcium responses separately for pulse amplitudes (left), widths (middle), and rates (right) collapsed across two other stimulation parameters. Gray window, 10 s VNS train; green bar at the bottom, the interval for VNS-evoked axonal calcium response measures (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m. (across VNS events; see Supplementary Fig. 6J, K for boxplot representations of the same data separately per animal). D VNS-evoked calcium response measures separately for pulse amplitudes and rates (left, collapsed across widths) and separately for pulse widths and rates (right, collapsed across amplitudes). Colored lines, fitted log-logistic function (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events). E VNS-evoked calcium response measures separately per pulse-charge (amplitude × width) and width, 10 Hz trains (left), and 20 Hz trains (right). Colored lines, fitted log-logistic function (see “Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events). F As in D, but for charge/pulse bins. Stats, two-sided paired-samples t test (tested against the response magnitudes in the lowest charge bin; ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05 false discovery rate corrected); blue, green, and brown backgrounds indicate no effects, optimal, and off-target pulse charges, respectively, defined by the pupil response data (as in Fig. 3D, F; “Methods”). BDN = 12 repetitions for each unique parameter combination (before artifact rejection; “Methods”). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5. VNS probabilistically causes locomotor activity.
Fig. 5. VNS probabilistically causes locomotor activity.
A VNS-evoked walk probability (see “Methods”) separately for pulse amplitudes and rates (collapsed across widths, left) and separately for pulse widths and rates (collapsed across amplitudes, right). Colored lines, fitted log-logistic function (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events). B As A, but for charge bins. Stats, two-sided one-sample t test (tested against 0; ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05 false discovery rate corrected); blue, green, and brown backgrounds indicate no effects, optimal, and off-target pulse charges, respectively, defined by the pupil response data (as in Fig. 3D, F; “Methods”). C Walked distance (walk trials only) after VNS train start, separately for pulse amplitudes (left), widths (middle), and rates (right) collapsed across two other stimulation parameters. Gray window, pulse duration; blue bar, the interval for VNS-evoked walking speed measures (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m. (across VNS events). D, E As A and B, but for walking speed on walk trials only. All panels: N = 27 repetitions for each unique parameter combination (before artefact rejection; “Methods”). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6. VNS triggered cortical acetylcholine release…
Fig. 6. VNS triggered cortical acetylcholine release mediates a large fraction of pupil dilation.
A VNS-evoked calcium response measures, in absence of walking, separately per charge/pulse bin and train rate. Colored lines, fitted log-logistic function (“Methods”); data are presented as mean values ± 1.96 × s.e.m. (across VNS events); stats, two-sided one-sample t test (tested against 0; ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05 false discovery rate corrected); blue, green, and brown backgrounds indicate no effects, optimal and off-target pulse charges, respectively, defined by the pupil response data (as in Fig. 3D, F; “Methods”). B As A, but for VNS-evoked pupil responses during the imaging sessions. C Scatterplot of the relationship between VNS-evoked pupil responses and VNS-evoked calcium responses, in absence of walking. Blue data points are individual VNS trains; gray data points are calcium response defined bins (equal size); red line, linear fit; Pearson correlation, P < 0.001. A first-order (linear) fit was superior to a constant fit (F1,178 = 116.19, P < 0.001), and a second-order (quadratic) fit was not superior to the first-order fit (F1,178 = 1.2, P = 0.28) (sequential polynomial regression; “Methods”). D As C, but after removing the effect of VNS (partial correlation). Pearson correlation, P < 0.001. A first-order (linear) fit was superior to a constant fit (F1,178 = 26.13, P < 0.001), and a second-order (quadratic) fit was not superior to the first-order fit (F1,178 = 0.08, P = 0.78). E Left, schematic of relationship between VNS and pupil responses. Arrow, regressions; coefficient c quantifies the “total effect”. Right, schematic of mediation analysis of VNS to pupil responses, via cholinergic axons responses (“Methods”). Arrows, regressions; coefficient a × b quantifies the “indirect” (mediation) effect; coefficient c’ quantifies the “direct effect”. F Fitted regression coefficients (kernel density estimate of 5 K bootstrapped replicates) of the total effect (brown), indirect path (mediation; pink), and the direct path (gray). Stats, the fraction of bootstrapped coefficients smaller than 0. All panels: N = 12 repetitions for each unique parameter combination (before artefact rejection; “Methods”). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Bailey P, Bremer F. A sensory cortical representation of the vagus nerve: with a note on the effects of low blood pressure on the cortical electrogram. J. Neurophysiol. 1938;1:405–412. doi: 10.1152/jn.1938.1.5.405.
    1. Zabara J. Peripheral control of hypersynchonous discharge in epilepsy. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985;61:S162. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90626-1.
    1. Groves DA, Brown VJ. Vagal nerve stimulation: a review of its applications and potential mechanisms that mediate its clinical effects. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2005;29:493–500. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.004.
    1. Edwards, C. A., Kouzani, A., Lee, K. H. & Ross, E. K. Neurostimulation devices for the treatment of neurologic disorders. in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 92, 1427–1444 (Elsevier, 2017).
    1. George MS, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation: a new tool for brain research and therapy∗. Biol. Psychiatry. 2000;47:287–295. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00308-X.
    1. Nahas, Z. et al. Two-year outcome of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment of major depressive episodes. J. Clin. Psychiatry66, 1097–1104 (2005).
    1. Rush AJ, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol. Psychiatry. 2005;58:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.025.
    1. Fang J, et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates default mode network in major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry. 2016;79:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.025.
    1. George MS, Aston-Jones G. Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:301. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.87.
    1. George MS, et al. A pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.02.001.
    1. Engineer CT, Hays SA, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation as a potential adjuvant to behavioral therapy for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2017;9:20. doi: 10.1186/s11689-017-9203-z.
    1. De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Engineer ND, Kilgard MP. Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a case series. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2014;17:170–179. doi: 10.1111/ner.12127.
    1. Sjögren, M. J. et al. Cognition-enhancing effect of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. J. Clin. Psychiatry63, 972–980 (2002).
    1. Naritoku DK, Terry WJ, Helfert RH. Regional induction of fos immunoreactivity in the brain by anticonvulsant stimulation of the vagus nerve. Epilepsy Res. 1995;22:53–62. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(95)00035-9.
    1. Chae J-H, et al. A review of functional neuroimaging studies of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) J. Psychiatr. Res. 2003;37:443–455. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00074-8.
    1. Krahl SE, Clark KB, Smith DC, Browning RA. Locus coeruleus lesions suppress the seizure‐attenuating effects of vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia. 1998;39:709–714. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01155.x.
    1. Groves DA, Bowman EM, Brown VJ. Recordings from the rat locus coeruleus during acute vagal nerve stimulation in the anaesthetised rat. Neurosci. Lett. 2005;379:174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.055.
    1. Hulsey DR, et al. Parametric characterization of neural activity in the locus coeruleus in response to vagus nerve stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 2017;289:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.12.005.
    1. Nichols J, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation modulates cortical synchrony and excitability through the activation of muscarinic receptors. Neuroscience. 2011;189:207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.024.
    1. Hulsey DR, et al. Reorganization of motor cortex by vagus nerve stimulation requires cholinergic innervation. Brain Stimul. 2016;9:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.12.007.
    1. Engineer ND, et al. Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature. 2011;470:101. doi: 10.1038/nature09656.
    1. Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM. Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science. 1998;279:1714–1718. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5357.1714.
    1. Evans M, Verma‐Ahuja S, Naritoku D, Espinosa J. Intraoperative human vagus nerve compound action potentials. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2004;110:232–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00309.x.
    1. Qing KY, et al. B fibers are the best predictors of cardiac activity during Vagus nerve stimulation. Bioelectron. Med. 2018;4:5. doi: 10.1186/s42234-018-0005-8.
    1. McGinley MJ, David SV, McCormick DA. Cortical membrane potential signature of optimal states for sensory signal detection. Neuron. 2015;87:179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.038.
    1. Vinck M, Batista-Brito R, Knoblich U, Cardin JA. Arousal and locomotion make distinct contributions to cortical activity patterns and visual encoding. Neuron. 2015;86:740–754. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.028.
    1. Reimer J, et al. Pupil fluctuations track fast switching of cortical states during quiet wakefulness. Neuron. 2014;84:355–362. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.033.
    1. McGinley MJ, et al. Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses. Neuron. 2015;87:1143–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.012.
    1. Reimer J, et al. Pupil fluctuations track rapid changes in adrenergic and cholinergic activity in cortex. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13289. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13289.
    1. Joshi S, Li Y, Kalwani RM, Gold JI. Relationships between pupil diameter and neuronal activity in the locus coeruleus, colliculi, and cingulate cortex. Neuron. 2016;89:221–234. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028.
    1. de Gee JW, et al. Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems. eLife. 2017;6:e23232. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23232.
    1. Bianca R, Komisaruk BR. Pupil dilatation in response to vagal afferent electrical stimulation is mediated by inhibition of parasympathetic outflow in the rat. Brain Res. 2007;1177:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.104.
    1. Lai, J. & David, S. V. Short-term effects of vagus nerve stimulation on learning and evoked activity in auditory cortex. Preprint at (2019).
    1. Ward MP, et al. A flexible platform for biofeedback-driven control and personalization of electrical nerve stimulation therapy. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabilitation Eng. 2014;23:475–484.
    1. Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci.21, 1281–1289 (2018).
    1. Loewenfeld, I. E. & Lowenstein, O. The pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications, Vol. 2 (Wiley-Blackwell, 1993).
    1. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002;15:1–25. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058.
    1. Ellrich J. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Eur. Neurol. Rev. 2011;6:254–256. doi: 10.17925/ENR.2011.06.04.254.
    1. Keute M, Demirezen M, Graf A, Mueller NG, Zaehle T. No modulation of pupil size and event-related pupil response by transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47961-4.
    1. Warren CM, et al. The neuromodulatory and hormonal effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as evidenced by salivary alpha amylase, salivary cortisol, pupil diameter, and the P3 event-related potential. Brain Stimul. 2019;12:635–642. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.224.
    1. Burger A, Van der Does W, Brosschot J, Verkuil B. From ear to eye? No effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on human pupil dilation: a report of three studies. Biol. Psychol. 2020;152:107863. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107863.
    1. Sharon O, Fahoum F, Nir Y. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in humans induces pupil dilation and attenuates alpha oscillations. J. Neurosci. 2021;41:320–330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1361-20.2020.
    1. Kret ME, Sjak-Shie EE. Preprocessing pupil size data: guidelines and code. Behav. Res. Methods. 2019;51:1336–1342. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1075-y.
    1. Larsen RS, Waters J. Neuromodulatory correlates of pupil dilation. Front. Neural Circuits. 2018;12:21. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00021.
    1. Murphy PR, O’Connell RG, O’Sullivan M, Robertson IH, Balsters JH. Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35:4140–4154. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22466.
    1. Varazzani C, San-Galli A, Gilardeau S, Bouret S. Noradrenaline and dopamine neurons in the reward/effort trade-off: a direct electrophysiological comparison in behaving monkeys. J. Neurosci. 2015;35:7866–7877. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0454-15.2015.
    1. Breton-Provencher V, Sur M. Active control of arousal by a locus coeruleus GABAergic circuit. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:218. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0305-z.
    1. Colizoli O, De Gee JW, Urai AE, Donner TH. Task-evoked pupil responses reflect internal belief states. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:13702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31985-3.
    1. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005;28:403–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709.
    1. Schriver BJ, Bagdasarov S, Wang Q. Pupil-linked arousal modulates behavior in rats performing a whisker deflection direction discrimination task. J. Neurophysiol. 2018;120:1655–1670. doi: 10.1152/jn.00290.2018.
    1. Waschke L, Tune S, Obleser J. Local cortical desynchronization and pupil-linked arousal differentially shape brain states for optimal sensory performance. Elife. 2019;8:e51501. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51501.
    1. de Gee JW, Knapen T, Donner TH. Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E618–E625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317557111.
    1. Gilzenrat MS, Nieuwenhuis S, Jepma M, Cohen JD. Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cogn., Affect., Behav. Neurosci. 2010;10:252–269. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.252.
    1. Berthoud H-R, Neuhuber WL. Functional and chemical anatomy of the afferent vagal system. Autonomic Neurosci. 2000;85:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S1566-0702(00)00215-0.
    1. Gabella G. Innervation of the gastrointestinal tract. Int Rev Cytol. 1979;59:129–193. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61662-9.
    1. Bookout, A. L. & Gautron, L. Characterization of a cell bridge variant connecting the nodose and superior cervical ganglia in the mouse: prevalence, anatomical features, and practical implications. J. Comp. Neurol.529, 111–128 (2020).
    1. Ballinger EC, Ananth M, Talmage DA, Role LW. Basal forebrain cholinergic circuits and signaling in cognition and cognitive decline. Neuron. 2016;91:1199–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.006.
    1. Dayan P. Twenty-five lessons from computational neuromodulation. Neuron. 2012;76:240–256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.027.
    1. Parikh V, Kozak R, Martinez V, Sarter M. Prefrontal acetylcholine release controls cue detection on multiple timescales. Neuron. 2007;56:141–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.025.
    1. Götz J, Bodea L-G, Goedert M. Rodent models for Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018;19:583–598. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0054-8.
    1. Pachitariu, M. et al. Suite2p: beyond 10,000 neurons with standard two-photon microscopy. Preprint at (2017).
    1. Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5-12 (BETA). J. Stat. Sofw.48, 1–36 2012).
    1. Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis, Vol. 326 (John Wiley & Sons, 1998).
    1. Gramfort A, et al. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 2014;86:446–460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027.
    1. Maris E, Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG-and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. methods. 2007;164:177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024.
    1. de Gee, J. W.& McGinley, M. J. Graded recruitment of pupil-linked neuromodulation by parametric stimulation of the vagus nerve. Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.4243062 (2020).

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe