Evolution of Electronic Cigarette Brands From 2013-2014 to 2016-2017: Analysis of Brand Websites

Greta Hsu, Jessica Y Sun, Shu-Hong Zhu, Greta Hsu, Jessica Y Sun, Shu-Hong Zhu

Abstract

Background: The electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) industry has grown in size and organizational complexity in recent years, most notably with the entry of major tobacco companies in 2012 and the proliferation of vape shops. Many brands maintain retail websites that present e-cigarette marketing claims and sell directly to consumers. Understanding of the evolving composition of different types of e-cigarette brand websites is currently underdeveloped.

Objective: This paper presents how e-cigarette brand websites surveyed in 2013-2014 evolved by 2016-2017, and how the websites run by different types of e-cigarette producers currently differ.

Methods: In 2016-2017, we revisited 466 e-cigarette brand websites surveyed in 2013-2014, 288 of which were extant, and identified 145 new English-language websites. We compared product designs, marketing claims, and age-based warnings presented by types of e-cigarette producers: major tobacco companies, independent vape shops, and independent internet-only companies.

Results: Among the 433 websites examined in 2016-2017, 12 were owned by major tobacco companies, 162 operated a physical vape shop, and 259 were internet-only operations. Closed-system product designs were sold by 83% (10/12) of tobacco-owned brands. In comparison, 29.0% (47/162, P<.001) of vape shop and 55.2% (143/259, P=.06) of internet-only brands sold closed-system designs. Compared with vape shop and internet-only brands, tobacco-owned brands offered a smaller set of product models (P values <.001) and a narrower range of flavors (P values <.01), with greater emphasis on the traditional combustible cigarette flavors of tobacco and menthol (P values <.001). Tobacco-owned brands also offered a narrower range of nicotine options than the vape shops (P=.002) and were less likely to offer nicotine-free e-liquid compared with internet-only and vape shop brands (P values <.001). Finally, 83% (10/12) of tobacco-owned brand websites featured age verification pop-up windows. In comparison, only 50.2% (130/259) of internet-only brands (P=.01) and 60.5% (98/162) of vape shop brands (P=.06) featured age verification windows. Websites surveyed in both 2013-2014 and 2016-2017 became more likely to sell open-system mods (P<.001) and sold an increased number of product models (P<.001), flavors (P<.001), and nicotine options (P<.001). Prevalence of several types of claims decreased significantly, including indirect claims regarding smoking cessation (P<.001), claims regarding e-cigarettes as healthier (P<.001), less expensive (P<.001), and usable in more places (P<.001) compared with combustible cigarettes.

Conclusions: The number of e-cigarette brands has not appeared to increase since 2014, even as website messaging evolved, with brands owned by tobacco companies and vape shops pulling in opposite directions. Brands owned by tobacco companies offered a limited range of e-cigarette products, whereas brands owned by vape shops emphasized a panoply of flavor and nicotine options. Furthermore, the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory action may influence the types of e-cigarette products offered and the market shares of various companies.

Keywords: electronic cigarettes; internet; longitudinal studies; market research; nicotine; vaping.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Greta Hsu, Jessica Y Sun, Shu-Hong Zhu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 12.03.2018.

References

    1. Wells Fargo Securities . Equity Research. San Francisco (CA): Wells Fargo Securities; 2015. Mar 31, Nielsen: Tobacco “All Channel” Data Cig Pricing Remains Strong; E-Cig $ Sales Growth Re-Accelerates.
    1. Farsalinos KE, Spyrou A, Tsimopoulou K, Stefopoulos C, Romagna G, Voudris V. Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices. Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 26;4:4133. doi: 10.1038/srep04133. doi: 10.1038/srep04133.
    1. Hajek P, Przulj D, Phillips A, Anderson R, McRobbie H. Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017 Mar;234(5):773–9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6.
    1. Chen C, Zhuang Y, Zhu S. E-cigarette design preference and smoking cessation: a U.S. population study. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Sep;51(3):356–63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.002.
    1. Brown CJ, Cheng JM. Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations. Tob Control. 2014 May;23(Suppl 2):ii4–10. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051476.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Know the Risks. 2016. [2018-02-18]. E-Cigarette use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general .
    1. Lee YO, Kim AE. 'Vape shops' and 'E-Cigarette lounges' open across the USA to promote ENDS. Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24(4):410–2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051437.
    1. Sussman S, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Garcia R, Barker DC, Samet JM, Leventhal A, Unger JB. Commentary: forces that drive the vape shop industry and implications for the health professions. Eval Health Prof. 2016 Sep;39(3):379–88. doi: 10.1177/0163278715586295.
    1. Dai H, Hao J. Geographic density and proximity of vape shops to colleges in the USA. Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):379–85. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052957.
    1. Wells Fargo Securities . Equity Research. San Francisco (CA): Wells Fargo Securities; 2015. Jan 23, Tobacco talk: independent vapor Mfr survey: more bullish than retailers—suggesting vapor growth remains robust.
    1. Grana RA, Ling PM. “Smoking revolution”: a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.010.
    1. Klein EG, Berman M, Hemmerich N, Carlson C, Htut S, Slater M. Online e-cigarette marketing claims: a systematic content and legal analysis. Tob Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;2(3):252–62. doi: 10.18001/TRS.2.3.5.
    1. Zhu SH, Sun JY, Bonnevie E, Cummins SE, Gamst A, Yin L, Lee M. Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation. Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23(Suppl 3):iii3–9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670.
    1. Seidenberg AB, Jo CL, Ribisl KM. Differences in the design and sale of e-cigarettes by cigarette manufacturers and non-cigarette manufacturers in the USA. Tob Control. 2016 Apr;25(e1):e3–5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052375.
    1. FDA. [2017-11-19]. Vaporizers, e-Cigarettes, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) .
    1. Abbasi J. FDA extends authority to e-Cigarettes: implications for smoking cessation? J Am Med Assoc. 2016 Aug 09;316(6):572–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8568.
    1. FDA. [2017-11-19]. FDA announces comprehensive regulatory plan to shift trajectory of tobacco-related disease, death .
    1. Mackey TK, Miner A, Cuomo RE. Exploring the e-cigarette e-commerce marketplace: identifying internet e-cigarette marketing characteristics and regulatory gaps. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Nov 01;156:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.032.
    1. Williams RS, Derrick J, Liebman AK, LaFleur K, Ribisl KM. Content analysis of age verification, purchase and delivery methods of internet e-cigarette vendors, 2013 and 2014. Tob Control. 2017 May 08;:-. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053616. Epub ahead of print(forthcoming)
    1. Burbank AD, Thrul J, Ling PM. A pilot study of retail 'Vape Shops' in the San Francisco bay area. Tob Prev Cessat. 2016;2(Suppl):6. doi: 10.18332/tpc/65229.
    1. Allem JP, Unger JB, Garcia R, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Sussman S. Tobacco attitudes and behaviors of vape shop retailers in Los Angeles. Am J Health Behav. 2015 Nov;39(6):794–8. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.6.7.
    1. Tsai JY, Bluthenthal R, Allem JP, Garcia R, Garcia J, Unger J, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Sussman SY. Vape shop retailers' perceptions of their customers, products and services: a content analysis. Tob Prev Cessat. 2016;2(Suppl):3. doi: 10.18332/tpc/70345.
    1. Cheney MK, Gowin M, Wann TF. Vapor store owner beliefs about electronic cigarette regulation. Tob Regul Sci. 2015 Oct 01;1(3):227–35. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.3.4.
    1. FDA. 2017. [2017-09-18]. Effective and compliance dates applicable to retailers, manufacturers, importers, and distributors of newly deemed tobacco products .
    1. Tavernise S. Nytimes. 2016. May 05, [2017-11-20]. F.D.A. imposes rules for e-Cigarettes in a landmark move .
    1. FDA. [2017-08-02]. Questions on FDA's new regulations for E-cigarettes, cigars, and all other tobacco products .
    1. Abrams DB. Promise and peril of e-cigarettes: can disruptive technology make cigarettes obsolete? J Am Med Assoc. 2014 Jan 08;311(2):135–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285347.
    1. Ericksen AB. Cstoredecisions. 2017. Feb 15, [2017-09-13]. E-tobacco: what's next?
    1. WFYI. 2016. [2017-08-02]. Indiana vape shop owners say new FDA rules will shut them down internet .
    1. Hsu G, Grodal S. Category taken-for-grantedness as a strategic opportunity: the case of light cigarettes. Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Jan 29;80(1):28–62. doi: 10.1177/0003122414565391.
    1. Zhuang YL, Cummins SE, Sun JY, Zhu SH. Long-term e-cigarette use and smoking cessation: a longitudinal study with US population. Tob Control. 2016 Dec;25(Suppl 1):i90–i95. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053096.
    1. Tackett AP, Lechner WV, Meier E, Grant DM, Driskill LM, Tahirkheli NN, Wagener TL. Biochemically verified smoking cessation and vaping beliefs among vape store customers. Addiction. 2015 May;110(5):868–74. doi: 10.1111/add.12878.
    1. Hitchman SC, Brose LS, Brown J, Robson D, McNeill A. Associations between e-cigarette type, frequency of use, and quitting smoking: findings from a longitudinal online panel survey in Great Britain. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1187–94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv078.
    1. Malas M, van der Tempel J, Schwartz R, Minichiello A, Lightfoot C, Noormohamed A, Andrews J, Zawertailo L, Ferrence R. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Dec;18(10):1926–36. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw119.
    1. Audrain-McGovern J, Strasser AA, Wileyto EP. The impact of flavoring on the rewarding and reinforcing value of e-cigarettes with nicotine among young adult smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Dec 01;166:263–7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.06.030.
    1. Goldenson NI, Kirkpatrick MG, Barrington-Trimis JL, Pang RD, McBeth JF, Pentz MA, Samet JM, Leventhal AM. Effects of sweet flavorings and nicotine on the appeal and sensory properties of e-cigarettes among young adult vapers: application of a novel methodology. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Dec 01;168:176–80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.014.
    1. Williams RS, Derrick J, Ribisl KM. Electronic cigarette sales to minors via the internet. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):e1563. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.63.
    1. Gottlieb S, Zeller M. A nicotine-focused framework for public health. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1111–1114. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707409.
    1. Pisinger C, Døssing M. A systematic review of health effects of electronic cigarettes. Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:248–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.009.
    1. England LJ, Bunnell RE, Pechacek TF, Tong VT, McAfee TA. Nicotine and the developing human: a neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):286–93. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.015.
    1. Beard E, West R, Michie S, Brown J. Association between electronic cigarette use and changes in quit attempts, success of quit attempts, use of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy, and use of stop smoking services in England: time series analysis of population trends. Br Med J. 2016 Sep 13;354:i4645.
    1. Zhu SH, Zhuang YL, Wong S, Cummins SE, Tedeschi GJ. E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population surveys. Br Med J. 2017 Jul 26;358:j3262.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe