Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial

Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Eduardo Kattan, Pavel Aguilera-González, Laura Sandoval-Plascencia, Uriel Rico-Jauregui, Carlos A Gómez-Partida, Iris X Ortiz-Macías, José A López-Pulgarín, Quetzalcóatl Chávez-Peña, Julio C Mijangos-Méndez, Guadalupe Aguirre-Avalos, Glenn Hernández, Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, Eduardo Kattan, Pavel Aguilera-González, Laura Sandoval-Plascencia, Uriel Rico-Jauregui, Carlos A Gómez-Partida, Iris X Ortiz-Macías, José A López-Pulgarín, Quetzalcóatl Chávez-Peña, Julio C Mijangos-Méndez, Guadalupe Aguirre-Avalos, Glenn Hernández

Abstract

Purpose: Methylene blue (MB) has been tested as a rescue therapy for patients with refractory septic shock. However, there is a lack of evidence on MB as an adjuvant therapy, its' optimal timing, dosing and safety profile. We aimed to assess whether early adjunctive MB can reduce time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with septic shock.

Methods: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we assigned patients with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria to MB or placebo. Primary outcome was time to vasopressor discontinuation at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included vasopressor-free days at 28 days, days on mechanical ventilator, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and mortality at 28 days.

Results: Among 91 randomized patients, forty-five were assigned to MB and 46 to placebo. The MB group had a shorter time to vasopressor discontinuation (69 h [IQR 59-83] vs 94 h [IQR 74-141]; p < 0.001), one more day of vasopressor-free days at day 28 (p = 0.008), a shorter ICU length of stay by 1.5 days (p = 0.039) and shorter hospital length of stay by 2.7 days (p = 0.027) compared to patients in the control group. Days on mechanical ventilator and mortality were similar. There were no serious adverse effects related to MB administration.

Conclusion: In patients with septic shock, MB initiated within 24 h reduced time to vasopressor discontinuation and increased vasopressor-free days at 28 days. It also reduced length of stay in ICU and hospital without adverse effects. Our study supports further research regarding MB in larger randomized clinical trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT04446871 , June 25, 2020, retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Catecholamine sparing; Methylene blue; Norepinephrine; Randomized controlled trial; Septic shock; Vasopressin.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trends of mean arterial pressure and norepinephrine requirement along the first 4 days after recruitment. p values reflect the between subjects (groups) comparison test. * p < 0.05 between groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier plot of the cumulative incidence of vasopressor discontinuation. Adjusted hazard ratio with death as a competing risk analysis. MB methylene blue, HR hazard ratio
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the change in monitoring values before initiation and after the last dose of intervention. p values reflect the between subjects (groups) comparison test. MB methylene blue, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase

References

    1. Ince C, Mayeux PR, Nguyen T, Gomez H, Kellum JA, Ospina-Tascón GA, Hernandez G, Murray P, De Backer D. ADQI XIV workgroup THE ENDOTHELIUM IN SEPSIS. Shock. 2016;45:259–270.
    1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1181–1247.
    1. Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, MacLean K, Sirounis D, Ayas NT. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids? JAMA. 2016;316:1298–1309.
    1. Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:880–891.
    1. Stolk RF, van der Pasch E, Naumann F, Schouwstra J, Bressers S, van Herwaarden AE, et al. Norepinephrine dysregulates the immune response and compromises host defense during sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:830–842.
    1. Stolk RF, Kox M, Pickkers P. Noradrenaline drives immunosuppression in sepsis: clinical consequences. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1246–1248.
    1. Leone M, Einav S, Antonucci E, Depret F, Lakbar I, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Multimodal strategy to counteract vasodilation in septic shock. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023;42:101193.
    1. Wieruszewski PM, Khanna AK. Early multimodal vasopressors-are we ready for it? Crit Care Med. 2022;50:705–708.
    1. Wieruszewski PM, Khanna AK. Vasopressor choice and timing in vasodilatory shock. Crit Care. 2022;26:76.
    1. Martin C, Medam S, Antonini F, Alingrin J, Haddam M, Hammad E, et al. Norepinephrine: not too much, too long. Shock. 2015;44:305–309.
    1. Auchet T, Regnier MA, Girerd N, Levy B. Outcome of patients with septic shock and high-dose vasopressor therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7:43.
    1. Puntillo F, Giglio M, Pasqualucci A, Brienza N, Paladini A, Varrassi G. Vasopressor-sparing action of methylene blue in severe sepsis and shock: a narrative review. Adv Ther. 2020;37:3692–3706.
    1. Busse LW, Barker N, Petersen C. Vasoplegic syndrome following cardiothoracic surgery-review of pathophysiology and update of treatment options. Crit Care. 2020;24:36.
    1. Kirov MY, Evgenov OV, Evgenov NV, Egorina EM, Sovershaev MA, Sveinbjørnsson B, et al. Infusion of methylene blue in human septic shock: a pilot, randomized, controlled study. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1860–1867.
    1. Memis D, Karamanlioglu B, Yuksel M, Gemlik I, Pamukcu Z. The influence of methylene blue infusion on cytokine levels during severe sepsis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:755–762.
    1. Sacha GL, Lam SW, Wang L, Duggal A, Reddy AJ, Bauer SR. Association of catecholamine dose, lactate, and shock duration at vasopressin initiation with mortality in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2022;50:614–623.
    1. Richards-Belle A, Hylands M, Muttalib F, Taran S, Rochwerg B, Day A, et al. Lower versus higher exposure to vasopressor therapy in vasodilatory hypotension: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2023;51:254–266.
    1. Ospina-Tascón GA, Büchele GL, Vincent JL. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trials evaluating mortality in intensive care: Doomed to fail? Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1311–1322.
    1. Khanna A, English SW, Wang XS, Ham K, Tumlin J, Szerlip H, et al. Angiotensin II for the treatment of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:419–430.
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810.
    1. Ibarra-Estrada MÁ, López-Pulgarín JA, Mijangos-Méndez JC, Díaz-Gómez JL, Aguirre-Avalos G. Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015;7:29.
    1. Ibarra-Estrada MA, Chávez-Peña Q, Reynoso-Estrella CI, Rios-Zermeño J, Aguilera-González PE, García-Soto MA, et al. Timing, method and discontinuation of hydrocortisone administration for septic shock patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2017;6:65–73.
    1. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–33.
    1. Evora PR. Methylene blue does not have to be considered only as rescue therapy for distributive shock. J Med Toxicol. 2013;9:426.
    1. Busse LW, Nicholson G, Nordyke RJ, Lee CH, Zeng F, Albertson TE. Angiotensin II for the treatment of distributive shock in the intensive care unit: a US cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:145–151.
    1. Farina N, Bixby A, Alaniz C. Angiotensin II brings more questions than answers. P T. 2018;43:685–687.
    1. Venkatesh B, Khanna AK, Cohen J. Less is more: catecholamine-sparing strategies in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1810–1812.
    1. Kotani Y, Di Gioia A, Landoni G, Belletti A, Khanna AK. An updated "norepinephrine equivalent" score in intensive care as a marker of shock severity. Crit Care. 2023;27:29.
    1. Bakker J, Kattan E, Annane D, Castro R, Cecconi M, et al. Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:148–163.
    1. López A, Lorente JA, Steingrub J, Bakker J, McLuckie A, Willatts S, et al. Multiple-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 546C88: effect on survival in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:21–30.
    1. Hosseinian L, Weiner M, Levin MA, Fischer GW. Methylene blue: Magic bullet for vasoplegia? Anesth Analg. 2016;122:194–201.
    1. Singh J, Lee Y, Kellum JA. A new perspective on NO pathway in sepsis and ADMA lowering as a potential therapeutic approach. Crit Care. 2022;26:246.
    1. Zhao CC, Zhai YJ, Hu ZJ, Huo Y, Li ZQ, Zhu GJ. Efficacy and safety of methylene blue in patients with vasodilatory shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:950596.
    1. Evora PR, Alves Junior L, Ferreira CA, Menardi AC, Bassetto S, Rodrigues AJ. Twenty years of vasoplegic syndrome treatment in heart surgery. Methylene blue revised. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015;30:84–92.
    1. Gachot B, Bedos JP, Veber B, Wolff M, Regnier B. Short-term effects of methylene blue on hemodynamics and gas exchange in humans with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21:1027–1031.
    1. Park BK, Shim TS, Lim CM, Lee SD, Kim WS, Kim DS, et al. The effects of methylene blue on hemodynamic parameters and cytokine levels in refractory septic shock. Korean J Intern Med. 2005;20:123–128.
    1. Donati A, Conti G, Loggi S, Münch C, Coltrinari R, Pelaia P. Does methylene blue administration to septic shock patients affect vascular permeability and blood volume? Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2271–2277.
    1. Weingartner R, Oliveira E, Oliveira ES, Sant'Anna UL, Oliveira RP, Azambuja LA, et al. Blockade of the action of nitric oxide in human septic shock increases systemic vascular resistance and has detrimental effects on pulmonary function after a short infusion of methylene blue. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999;32:1505–1513.
    1. Andresen M, Dougnac A, Díaz O, Hernández G, Castillo L, Bugedo G. Use of methylene blue in patients with refractory septic shock: impact on hemodynamics and gas exchange. J Crit Care. 1998;13:164–168.
    1. Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, Rajbhandari D, Arabi Y, Bellomo R, ADRENAL Trial Investigators and the Australian–New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:797–808.
    1. Sari-Yavuz S, Heck-Swain KL, Keller M, Magunia H, Feng YS, Haeberle HA. Methylene blue dosing strategies in critically ill adults with shock-A retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:1014276.
    1. Juffermans NP, Vervloet MG, Daemen-Gubbels CR, Binnekade JM, de Jong M, Groeneveld AB. A dose-finding study of methylene blue to inhibit nitric oxide actions in the hemodynamics of human septic shock. Nitric Oxide. 2010;22:275–280.
    1. Leyh RG, Kofidis T, Strüber M, Fischer S, Knobloch K, Wachsmann B, et al. Methylene blue: The drug of choice for catecholamine-refractory vasoplegia after cardiopulmonary bypass? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:1426–1431.
    1. Cefalu JN, Joshi TV, Spalitta MJ, Kadi CJ, Diaz JH, Eskander JP, et al. Methemoglobinemia in the operating room and intensive care unit: early recognition, pathophysiology, and management. Adv Ther. 2020;37:1714–1723.
    1. Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, Estenssoro E, Dubin A, Hurtado J, et al. Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:654–664.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe