Factors associated with short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Juan Pimentel, Umaira Ansari, Khalid Omer, Yagana Gidado, Muhd Chadi Baba, Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft, Juan Pimentel, Umaira Ansari, Khalid Omer, Yagana Gidado, Muhd Chadi Baba, Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft

Abstract

Background: There is ample evidence of associations between short birth interval and adverse maternal and child health outcomes, including infant and maternal mortality. Short birth interval is more common among women in low- and middle-income countries. Identifying actionable aspects of short birth interval is necessary to address the problem. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to systematize evidence on risk factors for short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods: A systematic mixed studies review searched PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Popline databases for empirical studies on the topic. We included documents in English, Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese, without date restriction. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and extracted the data. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to conduct a quality appraisal of the included studies. To accommodate variable definition of factors and outcomes, we present only a narrative synthesis of the findings.

Results: Forty-three of an initial 2802 documents met inclusion criteria, 30 of them observational studies and 14 published after 2010. Twenty-one studies came from Africa, 18 from Asia, and four from Latin America. Thirty-two reported quantitative studies (16 studies reported odds ratio or relative risk, 16 studies reported hazard ratio), 10 qualitative studies, and one a mixed-methods study. Studies most commonly explored education and age of the mother, previous pregnancy outcome, breastfeeding, contraception, socioeconomic level, parity, and sex of the preceding child. For most factors, studies reported both positive and negative associations with short birth interval. Shorter breastfeeding and female sex of the previous child were the only factors consistently associated with short birth interval. The quantitative and qualitative studies reported largely non-overlapping results.

Conclusions: Promotion of breastfeeding could help to reduce short birth interval and has many other benefits. Addressing the preference for a male child is complex and a longer-term challenge. Future quantitative research could examine associations between birth interval and factors reported in qualitative studies, use longitudinal and experimental designs, ensure consistency in outcome and exposure definitions, and include Latin American countries.

Trial registration: Prospectively registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD42018117654.

Keywords: Birth intervals; Breastfeeding; Developing countries; Pregnancy outcome; Systematic review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Countries where the studies were conducted. Created and reproduced with permission from the open-source web application mapchart.net [25].

References

    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA. 2006;295:1809. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
    1. World Health Organization . Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
    1. Dadi AF. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of short birth interval on infant mortality in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126759.
    1. Smits L, Pedersen C, Mortensen P, van Os J. Association between short birth intervals and schizophrenia in the offspring. Schizophr Res. 2004;70:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.10.002.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055.
    1. Cormick G, Betrán AP, Ciapponi A, Hall DR, Hofmeyr GJ. Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2016;13:83. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0197-x.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plan. 2012;43:93–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00308.x.
    1. Hailu D, Gulte T. Determinants of short Interbirth interval among reproductive age mothers in Arba Minch District, Ethiopia. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2016/6072437.
    1. Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;89:S7–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012.
    1. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Healthy timing and spacing of pregnancies: a family planning investment strategy for accelerating the pace of improvements in child survival. 2012.
    1. Ross JA, Winfrey WL. Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2001;21:20–27. doi: 10.2307/2673801.
    1. National Population Commission of Nigeria. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2018. Abuja: National Population Commission; 2019. . Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
    1. National Population Commission of Nigeria. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. National Population Commission: Abuja 2014. . Accessed 21 Jan 2019.
    1. Begna Z, Assegid S, Kassahun W, Gerbaba M. Determinants of inter birth interval among married women living in rural pastoral communities of southern Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-116.
    1. de Jonge HCC, Azad K, Seward N, Kuddus A, Shaha S, Beard J, et al. Determinants and consequences of short birth interval in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:427. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0427-6.
    1. PROSPERO. Factors associated with birth spacing in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. 2018;CRD42018117654. . Accessed 24 Aug 2019.
    1. Goel S, Angeli F, Dhirar N, Singla N, Ruwaard D. What motivates medical students to select medical studies: a systematic literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1123-4.
    1. . About POPLINE. 2019.
    1. World Bank . World bank country and lending groups. 2019.
    1. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Hong QN, Gonzalez-Reyes A, Pluye P. Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24:459–467. doi: 10.1111/jep.12884.
    1. Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002.
    1. Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:49–59.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008.
    1. Minas . MapChart - feedback. 2019.
    1. McNeilly AS, Tay CC, Glasier A. Physiological mechanisms underlying Lactational amenorrhea. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;709:145–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30394.x.
    1. Consensus Statement Breastfeeding as a family planning method. Lancet. 1988;332:1204–1205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90279-6.
    1. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare . FSRH guideline contraception after pregnancy. 2017.
    1. Oliveira IBB, Leal LP, Coriolano-Marinus MWDL, Santos AHDS, Horta BL, Pontes CM. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of educational interventions for breastfeeding promotion directed to the woman and her social network. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73:323–335. doi: 10.1111/jan.13104.
    1. Bellù R, Condò M. Breastfeeding promotion: evidence and problems. Pediatr Med Chir. 2017;39:156. doi: 10.4081/pmc.2017.156.
    1. Arnold F. The effect of sex preference on fertility and family planning: empirical evidence. Popul Bull UN. 1987;23-24(23-24):44–55.
    1. Hesketh T, Xing ZW. Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:13271–13275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602203103.
    1. Ben-Porath Y. Fertility response to child mortality: micro data from Israel. J Polit Econ. 1976;84:S163–S178. doi: 10.1086/260537.
    1. Ismail T, Hamzah T, Hassan M, Mahmood N. Prevalence and factors associated with short birth spacing among Malay women in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. Int Med J. 2008;15:131–136.
    1. Yohannes S, Wondafrash M, Abera M, Girma E. Duration and determinants of birth interval among women of child bearing age in southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-38.
    1. Sidze EM, Lardoux S, Speizer IS, Faye CM, Mutua MM, Badji F. Young women’s access to and use of contraceptives: the role of providers’ restrictions in urban Senegal. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40:176–184. doi: 10.1363/4017614.
    1. RamaRao S, Townsend J, Askew I. Correlates of inter-birth intervals: implications of optimal birth spacing strategies in Mozambique. 2006.
    1. Larsen U, Vaupel JW. Hutterite Fecundability by age and parity: strategies for frailty modeling of event histories. Demography. 1993;30:81. doi: 10.2307/2061864.
    1. Pew Research Center . Women and leadership. 2015.
    1. Ngianga-Bakwin K, Stones RW. Birth intervals and injectable contraception in sub-Saharan Africa. Contraception. 2005;71:353–356. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.10.013.
    1. Dehne KL. Knowledge of, attitudes towards, and practices relating to child-spacing methods in northern Burkina Faso. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21:55–66.
    1. Dean NR. A community study of child spacing, fertility and contraception in west Pokot District, Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1575–1584. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90119-8.
    1. Srithi K, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Srisanga P, Trisonthi C. Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the mien (Yao) in northern Thailand. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;123:335–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.02.035.
    1. Millard AV, Graham MA. Breastfeeding and demography in two Mexican villages. 1984.
    1. Akin A, Apelo R, Ashley D, et al. Breast-feeding and fertility regulation: current knowledge and programme policy implications. Bull World Health Organ. 1983;61:371–382.
    1. Egger M, Schneider M, Smith GD. Meta-analysis spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 1998;316:140–144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140.
    1. Shapiro S. Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:771–778. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117324.
    1. Lucas RM, McMichael AJ. Association or causation: evaluating links between “environment and disease”. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:792–795.
    1. Ahrens KA, Hutcheon JA, Ananth CV, Basso O, Briss PA, Ferré CD, et al. Report of the office of population affairs’ expert work group meeting on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: methodological quality of existing studies and future directions for research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33:O5–14.
    1. Del Ciampo L, Del Ciampo I. Breastfeeding and the benefits of lactation for women’s health. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obs / RBGO Gynecol Obstet. 2018;40:354–359. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1657766.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe