Coating (Coating to Optimize Aneurysm Treatment in the New Flow Diverter Generation) study. The first randomized controlled trial evaluating a coated flow diverter (p64 MW HPC): study design

Laurent Pierot, Saleh Lamin, Xavier Barreau, Ansgar Berlis, Elisa Ciceri, José E Cohen, Vincent Costalat, Omer F Eker, Hans Henkes, Markus Holtmannspötter, Anne-Christine Januel, Peter Keston, Joachim Klisch, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Luca Valvassori, Christophe Cognard, Laurent Spelle, Laurent Pierot, Saleh Lamin, Xavier Barreau, Ansgar Berlis, Elisa Ciceri, José E Cohen, Vincent Costalat, Omer F Eker, Hans Henkes, Markus Holtmannspötter, Anne-Christine Januel, Peter Keston, Joachim Klisch, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Luca Valvassori, Christophe Cognard, Laurent Spelle

Abstract

Background: Due to its high efficacy, flow diversion is increasingly used in the management of unruptured and recanalized aneurysms. Because of the need for perioperative dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), flow diversion is not indicated for the treatment of ruptured aneurysms. To overcome this major limitation, surface modification-'coating'-of flow diverters has been developed to reduce platelet aggregation on the implanted device, reduce thromboembolic complications, and facilitate the use of coated flow diverter treatment in patients with single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT). COATING (Coating to Optimize Aneurysm Treatment in the New Flow Diverter Generation) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial that aims to determine whether the use of the coated flow diverter p64 MW HPC under SAPT is non-inferior (or even superior) to the use of the bare flow diverter p64 MW under DAPT in relation to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

Methods: Patients with unruptured or recanalized aneurysms for which endovascular treatment with a flow diverter is indicated will be enrolled and randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups: p64 MW HPC with SAPT or p64 MW with DAPT.

Results: The primary endpoint is the number of diffusion-weighted imaging lesions visualized via MRI assessed within 48 hours (±24 hours) of the index procedure. Secondary primary endpoints are comparing safety and efficacy in both arms.

Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial is the first to directly compare safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters under SAPT with bare flow diverters under DAPT.

Trial registration number: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04870047" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT04870047.

Keywords: Aneurysm; Flow Diverter.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LP consults for Balt, MicroVention, Perflow, phenox, Vesalio. XB receives payment from MicroVention and Stryker for presentations and educational events. VC consults for MicroVention and Balt and receives educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker. HH is co-founder and previous shareholder of phenox GmbH and femtos GmbH. PK consults for Medtronic, MicroVention, phenox, Stryker. JK consults for MicroVention/Sequent. LS consults for Stryker, MicroVention, Medtronic, and Balt. Other authors report no conflict of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Pierot L. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol 2011;38:40–6. 10.1016/j.neurad.2010.12.002
    1. Pierot L, Wakhloo AK. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke 2013;44:2046–54. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000733
    1. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. . Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68. 10.1148/radiol.13120099
    1. Benaissa A, Januel A-C, Herbreteau D, et al. . Endovascular treatment with flow diverters of recanalized and multitreated aneurysms initially treated by endovascular approach. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:44–9. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011046
    1. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. . Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg 2017;127:775–80. 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467
    1. Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, et al. . Feasibility, complications, morbidity, and mortality results at 6 months for aneurysm treatment with the flow re-direction endoluminal device: report of safe study. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:765–70. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013559
    1. Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, et al. . SAFE study (Safety and Efficacy analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:184–9. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014261
    1. Bonafé A, Perez MA, Henkes H, et al. . Diversion-p64: results from an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the p64 flow modulation device. J Neurointerv Surg 2021. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017809. [Epub ahead of print: 15 Nov 2021].
    1. Rice H, Martínez Galdámez M, Holtmannspötter M, et al. . Periprocedural to 1-year safety and efficacy outcomes with the Pipeline embolization device with Shield technology for intracranial aneurysms: a prospective, post-market, multi-center study. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:1107–12. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015943
    1. Lenz-Habijan T, Bhogal P, Peters M, et al. . Hydrophilic stent coating inhibits platelet adhesion on stent surfaces: initial results in vitro. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018;41:1779–85. 10.1007/s00270-018-2036-7
    1. Lenz-Habjan T, Bhogal P, Bannewitz C. Prospective study to assess the tissue response to HPC-coated p48 flow diverter stents compared to uncoated devices in the rabbit carotid artery model. Eur Radiol Exp 2019;5:47. 10.1186/s41747-019-0128-z
    1. Petrov A, Rentsenkhuu G, Nota B, et al. . Initial experience with the novel p64MW HPC flow diverter from a cohort study in unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms under dual antiplatelet medication. Interv Neuroradiol 2021;27:42–50. 10.1177/1591019920939845
    1. Aguilar-Perez M, Hellstern V, AlMatter M, et al. . The p48 flow modulation device with hydrophilic polymer coating (HPC) for the treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms: early clinical experience using single antiplatelet therapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020;43:740–8. 10.1007/s00270-020-02418-4
    1. Warlo EMK, Arnesen H, Seljeflot I. A brief review on resistance to P2Y 12 receptor antagonism in coronary artery disease. Thromb J 2019;17:11. 10.1186/s12959-019-0197-5
    1. Pierot L, Barbe C, Nguyen HA, et al. . Intraoperative complications of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with coiling or Balloon-assisted coiling in a prospective multicenter cohort of 1088 participants: Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (ARETA) study. Radiology 2020;296:E130–3. 10.1148/radiol.2020204013
    1. Iosif C, Lecomte J-C, Pedrolo-Silveira E, et al. . Evaluation of ischemic lesion prevalence after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, as documented by 3-T diffusion-weighted imaging: a 2-year, single-center cohort study. J Neurosurg 2018;128:982–91. 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161020
    1. Bond KM, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, et al. . Diffusion-weighted Imaging-detected ischemic lesions following endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:304–9. 10.3174/ajnr.A4989
    1. Kang D-H, Kim BM, Kim DJ, et al. . MR-DWI-positive lesions and symptomatic ischemic complications after coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:789–91. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669853

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe