Pharmacokinetics of tedizolid following oral administration: single and multiple dose, effect of food, and comparison of two solid forms of the prodrug

Shawn D Flanagan, Paul A Bien, Kelly A Muñoz, Sonia L Minassian, Philippe G Prokocimer, Shawn D Flanagan, Paul A Bien, Kelly A Muñoz, Sonia L Minassian, Philippe G Prokocimer

Abstract

Objectives: The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of tedizolid were examined after oral administration of tedizolid phosphate disodium (TPD), including the effect of food on PK. The relative bioavailability of TPD to the free acid tedizolid phosphate was determined to bridge the results of these and other studies to the solid form of the prodrug selected for further development.

Design: Randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind single- and multiple-ascending dose studies and randomized open-label, crossover food effect and relative bioavailability studies.

Setting: Clinical Research Units.

Participants: Healthy subjects.

Intervention: Study TR701-101 enrolled 40 subjects in single-ascending dose (200-1200 mg TPD or placebo) and 40 subjects in 21-day multiple-ascending dose (200, 300, or 400 mg TPD once/day; 600 mg linezolid twice/day; or placebo) arms. Study TR701-103 was a food-effect study in 12 subjects administered 600 mg TPD. Study TR701-108 was a relative bioavailability study in 12 subjects administered 150-mg tedizolid equivalents as TPD or tedizolid phosphate.

Measurements and main results: Plasma concentrations of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate, its active moiety tedizolid, and/or linezolid were collected. After administration of 200 to 600 mg TPD, tedizolid values increased approximately dose proportionally in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ). Tedizolid half-life values were approximately 2-fold greater compared with linezolid. TPD administration with food delayed tedizolid absorption and reduced Cmax relative to the fasted state but did not alter AUC. Minimal accumulation was predicted and observed for tedizolid, whereas observed accumulation of linezolid exceeded predictions based on single-dose PK. Comparable PK of tedizolid was observed following oral administration of either TPD or tedizolid phosphate. In the multiple-ascending dose study, 3 of 24 tedizolid subjects were withdrawn under prespecified stopping rules (one each of elevated alanine aminotransferase, low reticulocyte count, or low white blood cell count), as was 1 of 8 linezolid subjects (low reticulocyte count).

Conclusions: Overall, tedizolid has a favorable PK profile, a half-life that supports once daily administration, and no nonlinearities at steady state. Tedizolid phosphate can be administered without regard to food.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00671359 NCT00671814 NCT00876655.

Keywords: TR-700; TR-701; TR-701 FA; food effect; pharmacokinetics; relative bioavailability; tedizolid phosphate disodium; tedizolid phosphate free acid.

© 2013 Trius Therapeutics. Pharmacotherapy published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles for tedizolid after a single oral dose of tedizolid phosphate disodium (TPD) at 200, 400, 600, 800, or 1200 mg. Subjects received a single administration of TPD (fasting) in the single-ascending dose arm of Study TR701-101.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles for tedizolid after multiple oral doses of tedizolid phosphate at 200, 300, or 400 mg/day. Subjects received a single administration of tedizolid phosphate disodium (TPD) each morning after an overnight fast in the multiple-ascending dose arm of Study TR701-101. Plasma concentrations of tedizolid were determined on Day 15 for the 200 mg dose group, or on Day 21 (or last day of dosing in case of earlier withdrawal) for higher dose groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between dose of tedizolid phosphate disodium (TPD) and tedizolid plasma pharmacokinetics. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞) were determined after a single dose of TPD in the single ascending dose arm of Study TR701-101 (six subjects per dose group). In the multiple ascending dose arm, Cmax was determined after the first dose of TPD, and AUC0–24 hr was determined at steady state. (A) Mean (± SD) Cmax versus dose. (B) Mean (± SD) AUC versus dose.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles for tedizolid after a single administration of 600 mg of tedizolid phosphate under fed or fasted conditions. Results from Study TR701-103 are shown in linear (A, mean ± SD) and log (B) scales.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles for tedizolid after a single administration of 150 mg of tedizolid from tedizolid phosphate disodium or tedizolid phosphate under fasted conditions. Results from Study TR701-108 are shown in linear (A, mean ± SD) and log (B) scales.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Pharmacokinetic parameter values for tedizolid for each subject after a single administration of 150 mg of tedizolid from tedizolid phosphate disodium or tedizolid phosphate under fasted conditions. Results from Study TR701-108 are shown for (A) area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞) and (B) maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

References

    1. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:520–32.
    1. Gerber JS, Coffin SE, Smathers SA, et al. Trends in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in children’s hospitals in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:65–71.
    1. Dryden MS. Complicated skin and soft tissue infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(Suppl 3):35–44.
    1. Pfizer. Zyvox (linezolid) Prescribing Information (Revised May 2013). Available from . Accessed July 08, 2013.
    1. Ager S, Gould K. Clinical update on linezolid in the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:87–102.
    1. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics cannot distinguish community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus infection: a prospective investigation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:471–82.
    1. Nguyen HM, Graber CJ. Limitations of antibiotic options for invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: is combination therapy the answer? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:24–36.
    1. Stefani S, Goglio A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: related infections and antibiotic resistance. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(Suppl 4):S19–22.
    1. van Hal SJ, Lodise TP, Paterson DL. The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:755–71.
    1. Tsiodras S, Gold HS, Sakoulas G, et al. Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2001;358:207–8.
    1. Meka VG, Gold HS. Antimicrobial resistance to linezolid. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1010–5.
    1. Peeters MJ, Sarria JC. Clinical characteristics of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Am J Med Sci. 2005;330:102–4.
    1. Flamm RK, Farrell DJ, Mendes RE, et al. LEADER Surveillance program results for 2010: an activity and spectrum analysis of linezolid using 6801 clinical isolates from the United States (61 medical centers) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74:54–61.
    1. Schaadt R, Sweeney D, Shinabarger D, Zurenko G. In vitro activity of TR-700, the active ingredient of the antibacterial prodrug TR-701, a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3236–9.
    1. Im WB, Choi SH, Park JY, et al. Discovery of torezolid as a novel 5-hydroxymethyl-oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. Eur J Med Chem. 2011;46:1027–39.
    1. Shaw KJ, Poppe S, Schaadt R, et al. In vitro activity of TR-700, the antibacterial moiety of the prodrug TR-701, against linezolid-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:4442–7.
    1. Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M, et al. Activity of oxazolidinone TR-700 against linezolid-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci and enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:713–5.
    1. Rodríguez-Avial I, Culebras E, Betriu C, et al. In vitro activity of tedizolid (TR-700) against linezolid-resistant staphylococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:167–9.
    1. Locke JB, Hilgers M, Shaw KJ. Novel ribosomal mutations in Staphylococcus aureus strains identified through selection with the oxazolidinones linezolid and torezolid (TR-700) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:5265–74.
    1. Louie A, Liu W, Kulawy R, et al. In vivo pharmacodynamics of torezolid phosphate (TR-701), a new oxazolidinone antibiotic, against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in a mouse thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3453–60.
    1. Keel RA, Tessier PR, Crandon JL, et al. Comparative efficacies of human simulated exposures of tedizolid and linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus in the murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4403–7.
    1. Drusano GL, Liu W, Kulawy R, et al. Impact of granulocytes on the antimicrobial effect of tedizolid in a mouse thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5300–5.
    1. Choi S, Im W, Bartizal K. Activity of tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) in murine models of infection with penicillin-resistant and penicillin-sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4713–7.
    1. Tessier PR, Keel RA, Hagihara M, et al. Comparative in vivo efficacies of epithelial lining fluid exposures of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2342–6.
    1. Housman ST, Pope JS, Russomanno J, et al. Pulmonary disposition of tedizolid following administration of once-daily oral 200-milligram tedizolid phosphate in healthy adult volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2627–34.
    1. Sahre M, Sabarinath S, Grant M, et al. Skin and soft tissue concentrations of tedizolid (formerly torezolid), a novel oxazolidinone, following a single oral dose in healthy volunteers. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40:51–4.
    1. Dreskin H, Boyea T, Barker J, Fang E, Prokocimer P. An evaluation of the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of orally administered [14C]-TR-701 FA in healthy subjects. [abstract A2-033]. Presented at the 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; September 17–20, 2011; Chicago, IL.
    1. Prokocimer P, Bien P, Surber J, et al. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety, tolerability, population pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of oral torezolid phosphate in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:583–92.
    1. Prokocimer P, Bien P, de Anda C, et al. In vitro activity and microbiological efficacy of tedizolid (TR-700) against gram-positive clinical isolates from a phase 2 study of oral tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4608–13.
    1. Prokocimer P, De Anda C, Fang E, Mehra P, Das A. Tedizolid phosphate versus linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:559–69.
    1. Bien P, Prokocimer P, Munoz KA, Boston MA, et al. Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple intravenous administration in healthy adult subjects [abstract A1-013]. Presented at the 50th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; September 12–15, 2010;
    1. Antal EJ, Grasela T, Bergstrom T, et al. The role of population PK/PD analysis during the implementation of a bridging strategy for linezolid, in 36th Drug Information Association Meeting; Hong Kong, November 16–19, 2000. Drug Information Association (DIA), Horsham, PA.
    1. Meagher AK, Forrest A, Rayner CR, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients treated in a compassionate-use program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:548–53.
    1. Plock N, Buerger C, Joukhadar C, et al. Does linezolid inhibit its own metabolism? Population pharmacokinetics as a tool to explain the observed nonlinearity in both healthy volunteers and septic patients. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35:1816–23.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe