A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness

Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Bronwyn Harrison, Hannah Istead, Ellie Brown, Stephen Pilling, Sonia Johnson, Tim Kendall, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Bronwyn Harrison, Hannah Istead, Ellie Brown, Stephen Pilling, Sonia Johnson, Tim Kendall

Abstract

Background: Little is known about whether peer support improves outcomes for people with severe mental illness.

Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Cochrane CENTRAL Register, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched to July 2013 without restriction by publication status. Randomised trials of non-residential peer support interventions were included. Trial interventions were categorised and analysed separately as: mutual peer support, peer support services, or peer delivered mental health services. Meta-analyses were performed where possible, and studies were assessed for bias and the quality of evidence described.

Results: Eighteen trials including 5597 participants were included. These comprised four trials of mutual support programmes, eleven trials of peer support services, and three trials of peer-delivered services. There was substantial variation between trials in participants' characteristics and programme content. Outcomes were incompletely reported; there was high risk of bias. From small numbers of studies in the analyses it was possible to conduct, there was little or no evidence that peer support was associated with positive effects on hospitalisation, overall symptoms or satisfaction with services. There was some evidence that peer support was associated with positive effects on measures of hope, recovery and empowerment at and beyond the end of the intervention, although this was not consistent within or across different types of peer support.

Conclusions: Despite the promotion and uptake of peer support internationally, there is little evidence from current trials about the effects of peer support for people with severe mental illness. Although there are few positive findings, this review has important implications for policy and practice: current evidence does not support recommendations or mandatory requirements from policy makers for mental health services to provide peer support programmes. Further peer support programmes should be implemented within the context of high quality research projects wherever possible. Deficiencies in the conduct and reporting of existing trials exemplify difficulties in the evaluation of complex interventions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of review search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias in included studies.

References

    1. Davidson L, Chinman M, Sells D, Rowe M. Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: a report from the field. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(3):443–450.
    1. Mead S. Defining Peer Support. 2003. Web resource: .
    1. Salzer M, Shear S. Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002;25(3):281–288.
    1. Bandura A, McClelland DC. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
    1. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7(2):117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202.
    1. Deegan P. Recovery as a journey of the heart. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1996;19(3):91–97.
    1. Clay S, Schell S, Corrigan P, Ralph R. On Our Own, Together. Peer Programs for People with Mental Illness. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2005.
    1. Faulkner A, Basset T. A helping hand: taking peer support into the 21st century. Ment Health Soc Incl. 2012;16(1):41. doi: 10.1108/20428301211205892.
    1. Halvorson A, Whitter M. Approaches to Recovery-Oriented Systems of Care at the State and Local Levels: Three Case Studies. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2009.
    1. The Royal College of Psychiatrists Social Inclusion Scoping Group. Mental Health and Social Inclusion: Making Psychiatry and Mental Health Services Fit for the 21st Century. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2009.
    1. Bradstreet S, Pratt R. Developing peer support worker roles: reflecting on experiences in Scotland. Ment Health Soc Incl. 2010;14(3):36–41. doi: 10.5042/mhsi.2010.0443.
    1. Armstrong N, Steffen JJ. The recovery promotion fidelity scale: assessing the organizational promotion of recovery. Community Ment Health J. 2009;45(3):163–170. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9176-1.
    1. Slade M. 100 ways to support recovery: a guide for mental health professionals. London: Rethink; 2009.
    1. Scottish Recovery Network. The role and potential development of peer support services. Glasgow: Scottish Recovery Network; 2005.
    1. Minnesota Department of Human Services. “Certified peer support services”. 2013. Web Resource:
    1. Repper J. Peer support workers: theory and practice. London: Centre for Mental Health; 2013.
    1. Davidson L, Chinman M, Kloos B, Weingarten R, Stayner D, Tebes J. Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: a review of the evidence. Clin Psychol-Sci Pr. 1999;6(2):165–187. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.6.2.165.
    1. Solomon P, Draine J. The state of knowledge of the effectiveness of consumer provided services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(1):20–27.
    1. Solomon P. Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(4):392–401.
    1. Pistrang N, Barker C, Humphreys K. Mutual help groups for mental health problems: a review of effectiveness studies. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;42(1–2):110–121.
    1. Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011;20(4):392–411. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.583947.
    1. Pitt V, Lowe D, Hill S, Prictor M, Hetrick SE, Ryan R. et al.Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD004807.
    1. Pfeiffer P, Heisler M, Piette J, Rogers M, Valenstein M. Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiat. 2011;33(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.10.002.
    1. Simpson E, House AO. Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. Br Med J. 2002;325(7375):1265–1268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1265.
    1. NCCMH. Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care. Updated ed. Leicester and London: The British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists; In press.
    1. Atkins D, Best D, Briss P, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S. et al.Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J. 2004;328(7454):1490.
    1. Simon G, Ludman E, Goodale L, Dykstra D, Stone E, Cutsogeorge D. et online recovery plan program: can peer coaching increase participation? Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(6):666–669. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.6.666.
    1. Solomon P, Draine J. One-year outcomes of a randomized trial of consumer case management. Eval Program Plann. 1995;18(2):135–146.
    1. Castelein S, Bruggeman R, van-Busschbach J, van-der Gaag M, Stant A, Knegtering H. et al.The effectiveness of peer support groups in psychosis: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;118:64–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01216.x.
    1. O’Donnell M, Parker G, Proberts M, Matthews R, Fisher D, Johnson B. et al.A study of client-focused case management and consumer advocacy: the Community and Consumer Service Project. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999;33(5):684–693. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.1999.00629.x.
    1. Salyers M, McGuire A, Rollins A, Bond G, Mueser K, Macy V. Integrating assertive community treatment and illness management and recovery for consumers with severe mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46(4):319–329. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9284-6.
    1. Druss B, Zhao L, von Esenwein S, Bona J, Fricks L, Jenkins-Tucker S. et al.The Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) Program: a peer-led intervention to improve medical self-management for persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Res. 2010;118(1–3):264–270.
    1. Kaufmann C. The self-help-employment-center - some outcomes from the first year. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1995;18(4):145–162.
    1. Rowe M, Bellamy C, Baranoski M, Wieland M, O’Connell M, Benedict P. et al.A peer-support, group intervention to reduce substance use and criminality among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:955–961. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.7.955.
    1. Forchuk C, Martin M, Chan Y, Jensen E. Therapeutic relationships: from psychiatric hospital to community. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005;12:556–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00873.x.
    1. Chinman M, Oberman RS, Hanusa BH, Cohen AN, Salyers MP, Twamley EW, A cluster randomized trial of adding peer specialists to intensive case management teams in the veterans health administration. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013. pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-013-9343-1.
    1. Proudfoot J, Parker G, Manicavasagar V, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Whitton A, Nicholas J. et al.Effects of adjunctive peer support on perceptions of illness control and understanding in an online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder: a randomised controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2012;142(1–3):98–105.
    1. Craig T, Doherty I, Jamieson-Craig R, Boocock A, Attafua G. The consumer-employee as a member of a mental health assertive outreach team. I. Clinical and social outcomes. J Ment Health. 2004;13(1):59–69. doi: 10.1080/09638230410001654567.
    1. Barbic S, Krupa T, Armstrong I. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a modified recovery workbook program: preliminary findings. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(4):491–497.
    1. Clarke G, Herinckx H, Kinney R, Paulson R, Cutler D, Lewis K. et al.Psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, emergency room visits, and homelessness of clients with serious and persistent mental illness: findings from a randomized trial of two ACT programs vs. usual care. Ment Health Serv Res. 2000;2(3):155–164. doi: 10.1023/A:1010141826867.
    1. Davidson L, Shahar G, Stayner DA, Chinman MJ, Rakfeldt J, Tebes JK. Supported socialization for people with psychiatric disabilities: lessons from a randomized controlled trial. J Community Psychol. 2004;32(4):453. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20013.
    1. Rogers E, Teague GB, Lichenstein C, Campbell J, Lyass A, Chen R, Banks S. Effects of participation in consumer-operated service programs on both personal and organizationally mediated empowerment: results of multisite study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(6):785–800. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2006.10.0125.
    1. Sells D, Davidson L, Jewell C, Falzer P, Rowe M. The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:1179–1184. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.8.1179.
    1. Sledge W, Lawless M, Sells D, Wieland M, O’Connell M, Davidson L. Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(5):541–544. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.5.541.
    1. Cook J, Copeland M, Jonikas J, Hamilton M, Razzano L, Grey D. et al.Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using wellness recovery action planning. Schizophr Bull. 2011;34:214–222.
    1. Cook J, Steigman P, Pickett S, Diehl S, Fox A, Shipley P. et al.Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support (BRIDGES) Schizophr Res. 2012;136(1–3):36–42.
    1. Kaplan K, Salzer M, Solomon P, Brusilovskiy E, Cousounis P. Internet peer support for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.037.
    1. Rivera J, Sullivan AM, Valenti SS. Adding consumer-providers to intensive case management: does it improve outcome? Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:802–809. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.802.
    1. Segal S, Silverman CJ, Temkin TL. Outcomes from consumer-operated and community mental health services: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(8):915–921.
    1. Van Gestel-Timmermans H, Brouwers E, Van Assen M, Van Nieuwenhuizen C. Effects of a peer-run course on recovery from serious mental illness: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(1):54–60.
    1. Edmundson E, Bedell J, Archer R, Gordon R. In: Community mental health and behavioural ecology. Jeger A, Slotnick R, editor. New York: Plenum; 1982. Intergrating skill building and peer support in mental health treatment; pp. 127–139.
    1. Higgins J, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. Cochrane Bias Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
    1. Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):445–452. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.
    1. Reeves BD, Higgins J, Wells J, Wells G. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic reviews of Interventions v.5.1.0. Higgins J, Green S, editor. Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Chapter 13: including non-randomised studies. Web resource: .
    1. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’amico R, Sowden A, Sakarovitch C, Song F. et al.Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Tech Assess. 2003;7(27):1–179.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Health services research: process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Br Med J. 2006;332(7538):413. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Altman D. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Br Med J. 1996;313(7057):570–571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.570.
    1. Mayo-Wilson E. Reporting implementation in randomized trials: proposed additions to the consolidated standards of reporting trials statement. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(4):630–633. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.094169.
    1. Schulz K, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):834–840. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005.
    1. Grant SP, Mayo-Wilson E, Melendez-Torres G, Montgomery P. Reporting quality of social and psychological intervention trials: a systematic review of reporting guidelines and trial publications. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e65442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065442.
    1. Harrison B, Mayo-Wilson E. Trial registration: understanding and preventing reporting bias in social work research. Res Soc Work Pract. In press.
    1. Finn L, Bishop B, Sparrow N. Capturing dynamic processes of change in GROW mutual help groups for mental health. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;44(3–4):302–315.
    1. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the promise: transforming mental health care in America. Final report. MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 2003. DHHS pub no SMA-03-3832.
    1. Perkins R, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Brown H. Recovery Colleges: Implementing Recovery through Organisational Change (ImROC) briefing paper. London: Centre for Mental Health; 2012.
    1. Coatsworth-Puspoky R, Forchuk C, Ward-Griffin C. Peer support relationships: an unexplored interpersonal process in mental health. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006;13(5):490–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00970.x.
    1. Smith-Merry J, Freeman R, Sturdy S. Implementing recovery: an analysis of the key technologies in Scotland. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-5-11.
    1. Repper J. A year of peer support in Nottingham: lessons learned. J Ment Health Train Pract. 2012;7(2):70. doi: 10.1108/17556221211236466.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe