An open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safe and effective use of the single-use autoinjector with an Avonex® prefilled syringe in multiple sclerosis subjects

J Theodore Phillips, Edward Fox, William Grainger, Dianne Tuccillo, Shifang Liu, Aaron Deykin, J Theodore Phillips, Edward Fox, William Grainger, Dianne Tuccillo, Shifang Liu, Aaron Deykin

Abstract

Background: The ability to self-inject in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has been associated with a reduced risk of missed injections and drug discontinuation, and a beneficial effect on patients' independence. However, injection anxiety, needle phobia and disease-related disability are major barriers to a patient's ability to self-administer treatment. Use of an autoinjector may improve patients' ability to self-inject. This study evaluated the safe and effective use of Avonex Pen™ (prefilled pen), a single use autoinjector, for intramuscular delivery of interferon beta-1a (IM IFNβ-1a, Avonex) in MS patients.

Methods: This was a Phase IIIb, open-label, single-country, multicenter trial in MS patients currently using IM IFNβ-1a prefilled syringes. Patients received weekly 30 mcg IM IFNβ-1a treatment over 4 weeks. On Day 1, patients self-administered IM IFNβ-1a using a prefilled syringe at the clinic. On Day 8, patients received training on the prefilled pen and self-administered IM IFNβ-1a using the device. On Day 15, patients self-administered IM IFNβ-1a at home using the prefilled pen. A final injection occurred at the clinic on Day 22 when patients self-administered IM IFNβ-1a using the prefilled pen while clinic staff observed and completed a detailed questionnaire documenting patients' ability to self-inject with the device. Serum neopterin levels were evaluated pre and post-injection on Days 1 and 8. Adverse events were monitored throughout.

Results: Seventy-one (96%) patients completed the study. The overall success rate in safely and effectively using the prefilled pen was 89%. No device malfunctions occurred. One unsuccessful administration occurred at Day 22 due to patient error; no patient injury resulted. Patients gave the prefilled pen high ratings (8.7-9.3) on a 10-point scale for ease of use (0 = extremely difficult, 10 = extremely easy). Ninety-four percent of patients preferred the prefilled pen over the prefilled syringe. Induction of serum neopterin levels, serving as a biomarker for type 1 interferon action, was similar to that of the prefilled syringe. The prefilled pen demonstrated a safety profile comparable to the prefilled syringe.

Conclusions: The prefilled pen is a safe and effective device for administration of IM IFNβ-1a and represents an alternative method for self-injection for MS patients using this therapy.

Trial registration: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00828204.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Avonex Pen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean patient preference scores for prefilled pen vs. the prefilled syringe on 7 domains relevant to self-injection (analysis population, n = 70). *Scores in each domain range from 0 (prefilled pen much worse) to 10 (prefilled pen much better).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Most common reasons reported for preferring the prefilled pen (analysis population, n = 70).

References

    1. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502–1517. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7.
    1. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 1993;43:655–661.
    1. Jacobs LD, Cookfair DL, Rudick RA, Herndon RM, Richert JR, Salazar AM, Fischer JS, Goodkin DE, Granger CV, Simon JH, Ann Neurol. Vol. 39. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG); 1996. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis; pp. 285–294.
    1. Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, Ford CC, Goldstein J, Lisak RP, Myers LW, Panitch HS, Rose JW, Schiffer RB. Neurology. Vol. 45. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group; 1995. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial; pp. 1268–1276.
    1. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon b-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group. Randomised doubleblind placebo-controlled study of interferon b-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 1998;352:1498–504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03334-0. [Erratum, Lancet 1999; 353:678.]
    1. Mohr DC, Cox D, Merluzzi N. Self-injection anxiety training: a treatment for patients unable to self-inject injectable medications. Mult Scler. 2005;11:182–185. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1146oa.
    1. Buhse M. Efficacy of EMLA cream to reduce fear and pain associated with interferon beta-1a injection in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006;38:222–226. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200608000-00004.
    1. Turner AP, Williams RM, Sloan AP, Haselkorn JK. Injection anxiety remains a long-term barrier to medication adherence in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54:116–121.
    1. Patti F. Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: the importance of treatment adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:1–9.
    1. Cox D, Stone J. Managing self-injection difficulties in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006;38:167–171. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200606000-00005.
    1. Mohr DC, Boudewyn AC, Likosky W, Levine E, Goodkin DE. Injectable medication for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: the influence of self efficacy expectations and injection anxiety on adherence and ability to self-inject. Ann Behav Med. 2001;23:125–132. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_7.
    1. Lugaresi A. Addressing the need for increased adherence to multiple sclerosis therapy: can delivery technology enhance patient motivation? Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2009;6:995–1002. doi: 10.1517/17425240903134769.
    1. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and treatment preference associated with use of a pen device delivering a premixed 70/30 insulin aspart suspension (aspart protamine suspension/soluble aspart) versus alternative treatment strategies. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2495–2497. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2495.
    1. Summers KH, Szeinbach SL, Lenox SM. Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers. Clin Ther. 2004;26:1498–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.009.
    1. Hornquist JO, Wikby A, Andersson PO, Dufva AM. Insulin-pen treatment, quality of life and metabolic control: retrospective intra-group evaluations. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1990;10:221–230. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(90)90065-2.
    1. Mikol D, Lopez-Bresnahan M, Taraskiewicz S, Chang P, Rangnow J. A randomized, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial of the tolerability of interferon beta-1a (Rebif) administered by autoinjection or manual injection in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005;11:585–591. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1197oa.
    1. Kozubski W. Autoinjector Improves Injection-related Tolerability Issues in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis - Exploring the New ExtaviJect™ 30G System for the Injection of Interferon Beta-1b. Eur Neurol Rev. 2010;5(2):77–81.
    1. Lugaresi A, Durastanti V, Gasperini C, Lai M, Pozzilli C, Orefice G, Sotgiu S, Pucci E, Ardito B, Millefiorini E. Safety and tolerability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with high-dose subcutaneous interferon-beta by Rebiject autoinjection over a 1-year period: the CoSa study. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008;31:167–172. doi: 10.1097/wnf.0b013e3181571a8e.
    1. Brochet B, Lemaire G, Beddiaf A. Reduction of injection site reactions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients newly started on interferon beta 1b therapy with two different devices. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2006;162:735–740. doi: 10.1016/S0035-3787(06)75071-8.
    1. Freedman SM, Cox D, Rosebrough T. A prospective baseline versus on treatment study assessing patient perceptions of using a smaller needle when injecting intramuscular interferon beta-1 a (Avonex) J Neurosci Nurs. 2008;40:350–355. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200812000-00007.
    1. Poland GA, Borrud A, Jacobson RM, McDermott K, Wollan PC, Brakke D, Charboneau JW. Determination of deltoid fat pad thickness. Implications for needle length in adult immunization. JAMA. 1997;277:1709–1711. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.21.1709.
    1. Song TT, Nelson MR, Chang JH, Engler RJ, Chowdhury BA. Adequacy of the epinephrine autoinjector needle length in delivering epinephrine to the intramuscular tissues. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;94:539–542. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61130-1.
    1. Gibney MA, Arce CH, Byron KJ, Hirsch LJ. Skin and subcutaneous adipose layer thickness in adults with diabetes at sites used for insulin injections: implications for needle length recommendations. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1519–1530. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.481203.
    1. Frid A, Hardebo JE. The thigh may not be suitable as an injection site for patients self-injecting sumatriptan. Neurology. 1997;49(2):559–61.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe