Effect of spectacles on changes of spherical hypermetropia in infants who did, and did not, have strabismus

R M Ingram, L E Gill, T W Lambert, R M Ingram, L E Gill, T W Lambert

Abstract

Aim: To explore why emmetropisation fails in children who have strabismus.

Methods: 289 hypermetropic infants were randomly allocated spectacles and followed. Changes in spherical hypermetropia were compared in those who had strabismus and those who did not. The effect of wearing glasses on these changes was assessed using t tests and regression analysis.

Results: Mean spherical hypermetropia decreased in both eyes of "normal" children (p<0.001). The consistent wearing of glasses impeded this process in both eyes (p<0.007). In the children with strabismus, there were no significant changes in either eye, irrespective of treatment (p>0. 05).

Conclusions: In contrast with normal infants, neither eye of those who had strabismus emmetropised, irrespective of whether the incoming vision was clear or blurred. It is suggested that these eyes did not "recognise" the signal of blurred vision, and that they remained long sighted because they were destined to squint. Hence, the children did not squint because they were long sighted, and glasses did not prevent them squinting.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of spectacles on changes in spherical hypermetropia of normal children (linear regression with 95% confidence intervals).

References

    1. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1994;253:135-46
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Dec;76(12):723-7
    1. Nat Med. 1995 Aug;1(8):761-5
    1. Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):189-98
    1. Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Oct;74(10):822-43
    1. Eye (Lond). 1999;13 ( Pt 1):83-92
    1. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):488-508
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1961 Aug;52:197-200
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1959 Nov;48:647-56
    1. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1994;253:41-56
    1. J Am Optom Assoc. 1970 Jul;41(7):624-6
    1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975 Apr;52(4):243-7
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Aug;19(8):942-9
    1. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1982;2(3):205-12
    1. Vision Res. 1984;24(12):1829-34
    1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Oct;62(10):680-8
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1986 May;55(5):896-914
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990 Mar;74(3):158-9
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Sep 15;110(3):287-92
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990 Oct;74(10):589-94
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jul;75(7):414-6
    1. Eye (Lond). 1992;6 ( Pt 2):154-60

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe