Dentoalveolar effects produced by different appliances on early treatment of anterior open bite: A randomized clinical trial

Paulo Henrique Rossato, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Flávia Diane Assis Urnau, Ana Cláudia de Castro, Ferreira Conti, Renato Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro, Paulo Henrique Rossato, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Flávia Diane Assis Urnau, Ana Cláudia de Castro, Ferreira Conti, Renato Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro

Abstract

Objectives:: To compare different appliances for early anterior open bite (AOB) correction.

Materials and methods:: This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. A prospective sample of patients with AOB was recruited consecutively. Eligibility criteria included angle class I malocclusion with AOB equal to or greater than 1 mm. Participants were allocated by simple randomization to 4 groups: bonded spurs, chin cup, fixed palatal crib, and removable palatal crib. Dentoalveolar changes among the groups were assessed by blinded observers by comparing lateral cephalograms taken before (T1) and 12 months after treatment (T2; analysis of variance followed by Tukey test). Of the measurements, 30% were reassessed for reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman agreement test; α = 5%; 95% confidence interval).

Results:: A total of 99 patients with a mean AOB of 3.7 mm (mean age 8.4 ± 0.8 years, both genders) were recruited. Dropouts occurred in all the groups, yielding a final sample size of 81 analyzed individuals. Intergroup comparisons of differences (T2-T1) showed significant differences for the incisor positioning variables (1.1, 1-PP, 6-PP, IMPA, 1.NB and 1-GoMe). However, there was no significant difference in AOB reduction among the groups, with an average correction of 3.1 mm.

Conclusions:: All of the tested devices promoted dental changes, especially in the anterior region, and contributed to AOB reduction during the study period. However, fixed palatal crib demonstrated greater impact on the positioning of the incisors.

Keywords: Interceptive orthodontics; Open bite; Orthodontics.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Appliances used: (A) bonded spurs (BS), (B) chin cup (CC), (C) fixed palatal crib (FPC), (D) removable palatal crib (RPC).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cephalometric points: S indicates sella; N, nasion; Po, porion; Or, orbitale; A, subspinale; B, supramentale; Me, mentalis; Go, gonion; Gn, gnathion; ANS, anterior nasal spine; PNS, posterior nasal spine; UI, incisal edge of the maxillary incisor; UIA, apex of the maxillary incisor; LI, incisal edge of the mandibular incisor; LIA, apex of the mandibular incisor; UMT, mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar; LMT, mesiobuccal cusp of the mandibular first molar.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Less usual cephalometric variables. 1, overbite (distance between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors, perpendicular to the occlusal plane); 2, U1-PP (perpendicular distance between the tip of maxillary central incisor and the palatal plane); 3, L1-GoMe (perpendicular distance from the tip of mandibular incisor to the GoMe line); 4, U6-PP (perpendicular distance from the maxillary first molar mesial point to the palatal plane); 5, L6-GoMe (perpendicular distance from the mandibular first molar mesial point to the GoMe line).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Consolidate Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram showing the flow of patients through the trial.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe