CONDISOX- continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation of induced labour in a double-blind randomised controlled trial

Sidsel Boie, Julie Glavind, Niels Uldbjerg, Jannet J H Bakker, Joris A M van der Post, Philip J Steer, Pinar Bor, Sidsel Boie, Julie Glavind, Niels Uldbjerg, Jannet J H Bakker, Joris A M van der Post, Philip J Steer, Pinar Bor

Abstract

Background: Oxytocin is an effective drug for induction of labour, but is associated with serious adverse effects of which uterine tachysystole, fetal distress and the need of immediate delivery are the most common. Discontinuation of oxytocin once the active phase of labour is established could reduce the adverse effects. The objective is to investigate how the caesarean section rate is affected when oxytocin stimulation is discontinued in the active phase of labour compared to labours where oxytocin is continued.

Methods: CONDISOX is a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted at Danish and Dutch Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The first participant was recruited on April 8 2016. Based on a clinically relevant relative reduction in caesarean section rate of 7%, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 80%, we aim for 1200 participating women (600 in each arm). The CONDISOX trial includes women at a gestational age of 37-42 complete weeks of pregnancy, who have uterine activity stimulated with oxytocin infusion for the induction of labour. Women are randomised when the active phase of labour becomes established, to study medication containing either oxytocin (continuous group) or placebo (discontinued group) infusion. Women are stratified by birth site, indication for oxytocin stimulation (induction of labour, prelabour rupture of membranes) and parity (nulliparous, parous +/- previous caesarean section). We will compare the primary outcome, caesarean section rate, in the two groups using a chi-square test with a p-value of 0.05. If superiority is not demonstrated, we have a pre-defined post hoc non-inferiority boundary (margin, delta) at 1.09. Secondary outcomes include duration of the active phase of labour, incidence of uterine tachysystole, postpartum haemorrhage, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, Apgar score, umbilical arterial blood pH, and birth experience.

Discussion: The high frequency of oxytocin use and the potential risks of both maternal and fetal adverse effects of oxytocin emphasise the need to determine the optimal oxytocin regime for induction of labour.

Trial registration: NCT02553226 (registered September 17, 2015). Eudra-CT number: 2015-002942-30.

Keywords: Caesarean section; Discontinuation; Induction of labour; Oxytocin.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart

References

    1. Daniel-Spiegel E, Weiner Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Shalev E. For how long should oxytocin be continued during induction of labour? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111(4):331–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00096.x.
    1. Diven LC, Rochon ML, Gogle J, Eid S, Smulian JC, Quinones JN. Oxytocin discontinuation during active labor in women who undergo labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(6):471.e1–4471e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.035.
    1. Girard B, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Discontinuation of oxytocin in the active phase of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):172–177. doi: 10.1080/00016340802649816.
    1. Ustunyurt E, Ugur M, Ustunyurt BO, Iskender TC, Ozkan O, Mollamahmutoglu L. Prospective randomized study of oxytocin discontinuation after the active stage of labor is established. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(6):799–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00659.x.
    1. National Danish Guideline for the use of Oxytocin, (DSOG 2013), . Accessed Aug 2019.
    1. The Summary of Product Characteristics of Syntocinon®, Danish Health and Medicine Authority, 2018,
    1. Phaneuf S, Rodriguez Linares B, TambyRaja RL, MacKenzie IZ, Lopez Bernal A. Loss of myometrial oxytocin receptors during oxytocin-induced and oxytocin-augmented labour. J Reprod Fertil. 2000;120(1):91–97. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1200091.
    1. Fernández IO, Gabriel MM, Martínez AM, Morillo AF, Sánchez FL, Costarelli V. Newborn feeding behaviour depressed by intrapartum oxytocin : a pilot study. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(7):749–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02668.x.
    1. Bor P, Ledertoug S, Boie S, Knoblauch NO, Stornes I. Continuation versus discontinuation of oxytocin infusion during the active phase of labour: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016;123(1):129–135. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13589.
    1. Boie S, Velu AH, Glavind J, Bor P, Uldbjerg N, Mol B, Post JVD, Thornton J, Bakker J. Cochrane review: Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour for improving outcomes. 2018.
    1. Danske regioner . Safe deliveries. 2012.
    1. Administration of Medication (in Danish), Regional Guideline . lægemiddeladministration, regional retningslinje. 2012.
    1. National Dutch guideline for the use of oxytocin (in Dutch), Inductie van de baring 1.0 (NVOG 2006) . Accessed Aug 2019.
    1. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
    1. Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe