Dexmedetomidine as anesthetic adjunct for fast tracking and pain control in off-pump coronary artery bypass

Mohamed Essam Abdel-Meguid, Mohamed Essam Abdel-Meguid

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (a highly selective alpha-2 agonist) in achieving fast tracking and improved postoperative pain control in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patients.

Methods: THIRTY PATIENTS SCHEDULED FOR ELECTIVE OPCAB WERE PROSPECTIVELY RANDOMIZED INTO TWO GROUPS: Group I (15 patients) started dexmedetomidine at 0.5 ug/kg/hour after the induction of anesthesia; this was reduced to 0.3 ug/kg/hour on admission in the cardiac intensive care unit and continued for 12 hours post extubation. Group II (15 patients) received a similar volume and infusion rate of normal saline. Visual analog scale (VAS) of 10-100 was explained thoroughly to the patients during the preoperative visit. Postoperative pain was managed with morphine. The total dose of morphine was recorded. Extubation time and VAS was recorded every two hours for 12 hours post extubation.

Results: Extubation time in group I was 72±8 minutes and 186±22 minutes in group II. Mean total use of narcotics in group II was 23.5±20.7 mg compared to 11.4±6.3 mg in group I. VAS median figures were lower at all data points in group I than in group II.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine showed an effective and safe profile as an anesthetic adjunct in OPCAB, achieving fast tracking of patients and higher quality of pain control with a lower consumption of narcotics.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; fast tracking; off-pump coronary artery bypass; postoperative pain.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trend of postoperative visual analog scale in both groups

References

    1. Carollo DS, Nossaman BD, Ramadhyani U. Dexmedetomidine: A review of clinical applications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:457–61.
    1. Afonso J, Reis F. Dexmedetomidine: Current role in anesthesia and intensive care. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012;62:118–33.
    1. Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of alpha2 adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1345–9.
    1. Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:461–6.
    1. Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:699–705.
    1. Jalonen J, Hynynen M, Kuitunen A, Heikkilä H, Perttilä J, Salmenperä M, et al. Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct in coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:331–45.
    1. Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass surgery; dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:576–84.
    1. Ickeringill M, Shehabi Y, Adamson H, Ruettimann U. Dexmedetomidine infusion without loading dose in surgical patients requiring mechanical ventilation: Haemodynamic effects and efficacy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004;32:741–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe