Ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging to guide peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Sarah J Curtis, William R Craig, Erin Logue, Ben Vandermeer, Amanda Hanson, Terry Klassen, Sarah J Curtis, William R Craig, Erin Logue, Ben Vandermeer, Amanda Hanson, Terry Klassen

Abstract

Background: Peripheral intravenous catheterization in children is challenging, and success rates vary greatly. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to determine whether the use of ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging to guide catheterization would be more effective than the standard approach in achieving successful catheter placement on the first attempt.

Methods: We enrolled a convenience sample of 418 children in a pediatric emergency department who required peripheral intravenous catheterization between June 2010 to August 2012. We stratified them by age (≤ 3 yr and > 3 yr) and randomly assigned them to undergo the procedure with the standard approach, or with the help of either ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had successful placement of a catheter on the first attempt.

Results: The rate of successful first attempts did not differ significantly between either of the 2 intervention groups and the standard approach group (differences in proportions -3.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -14.2% to 6.5%, for ultrasound imaging; -8.7%, 95% CI -19.4% to 1.9%, for near-infrared imaging). Among children 3 years and younger, the difference in success rates relative to standard care was also not significant for ultrasound imaging (-9.6%, 95% CI -29.8% to 10.6%), but it was significantly worse for near-infrared imaging (-20.1%, 95% CI -40.1% to -0.2%). Among children older than 3 years, the differences in success rates relative to standard care were smaller but not significant (-2.3%, 95% CI -13.6% to 9.0%, for ultrasound imaging; -4.1%, 95% CI -15.7% to 7.5%, for near-infrared imaging). None of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant in any of the outcomes.

Interpretation: Neither technology improved first-attempt success rates of peripheral intravenous catheterization in children, even in the younger group. These findings do not support investment in these technologies for routine peripheral intravenous catheterization in children.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01133652.

© 2015 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Selection of patients and allocation to study arms. No patients were excluded from analysis or lost to follow-up. R = randomization.

References

    1. Welch SJ. Twenty years of patient satisfaction research applied to the emergency department: a qualitative review. Am J Med Qual 2010;25:64–72.
    1. Lininger RA. Pediatric peripheral i.v. insertion success rates. Pediatr Nurs 2003;29:351–4.
    1. Reigart JR, Chamberlain KH, Eldridge D, et al. Peripheral intravenous access in pediatric inpatients. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2012; 51:468–72.
    1. Peterson KA, Phillips AL, Truemper E, et al. Does the use of an assistive device by nurses impact peripheral intravenous catheter insertion success in children? J Pediatr Nurs 2012;27: 134–43.
    1. Frey AM. Success rates for peripheral IV insertion in a children’s hospital. J Intraven Nurs 1998;21:160–5.
    1. Black KJ, Pusic M, Harmindy D, et al. Pediatric intravenous insertion in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2005; 21:707–11.
    1. Chapman LL, Sullivan B, Pacheco AL, et al. VeinViewer-assisted intravenous catheter placement in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:966–71.
    1. Perry AM, Caviness AC, Hsu DC. Efficacy of a near-infrared light device in pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011;27:5–10.
    1. Katsogridakis YL, Seshadri R, Sullivan C, et al. Veinlite transillumination in the pediatric emergency department: a therapeutic interventional trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008;24:83–8.
    1. Goff DA, Larsen P, Brinkley J, et al. Resource utilization and cost of inserting peripheral intravenous catheters in hospitalized children. Hospital Pediatrics. 2013;3:185–91.
    1. Rinke ML. Not just a little pinch: first do no harm with pediatric peripheral IV catheters. Hosp Pediatr 2013;3:192–3.
    1. Doniger SJ, Ishimine P, Fox JC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009;25:154–9.
    1. Bair AE, Rose JS, Vance CW, et al. Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous access in young children: a randomized controlled trial and pilot feasibility study. West J Emerg Med 2008;9:219–24.
    1. Heinrichs J, Fritze Z, Vandermeer B, et al. Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation of children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 61:444–454.e1.
    1. Cuper NJ, De Graaff JC, Verdaasdonk RM, et al. Near-infrared imaging in intravenous cannulation in children: a cluster randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 2013;131:e191–7.
    1. Szmuk P, Steiner J, Pop RB, et al. The VeinViewer vascular imaging system worsens first-attempt cannulation rate for experienced nurses in infants and children with anticipated difficult intravenous access. Anesth Analg 2013;116:1087–92.
    1. de Graaff JC, Cuper NJ, Mungra RAA, et al. Near-infrared light to aid peripheral intravenous cannulation in children: a cluster randomised clinical trial of three devices. Anaesthesia 2013;68: 835–45.
    1. Heinrichs J, Fritze Z, Klassen T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of new interventions for peripheral intravenous cannulation of children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013;29:858–66.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe