Corneal transplantation in the modern era

Rashmi Singh, Noopur Gupta, M Vanathi, Radhika Tandon, Rashmi Singh, Noopur Gupta, M Vanathi, Radhika Tandon

Abstract

Corneal blindness is one of the major causes of reversible blindness, which can be managed with transplantation of a healthy donor cornea. It is the most successful organ transplantation in the human body as cornea is devoid of vasculature, minimizing the risk of graft rejection. The first successful transplant was performed by Zirm, and since then, corneal transplantation has seen significant evolution. It has been possible because of the relentless efforts by researchers and the increase in knowledge about corneal anatomy, improvement in instruments and advancements in technology. Keratoplasty has come a long way since the initial surgeries wherein the whole cornea was replaced to the present day where only the selective diseased layer can be replaced. These newer procedures maintain structural integrity and avoid catastrophic complications associated with open globe surgery. Corneal transplantation procedures are broadly classified as full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty and partial lamellar corneal surgeries which include anterior lamellar keratoplasty [sperficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty (SALK), automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty (ALTK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK)] and posterior lamellar keratoplasty [Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)] broadly.

Keywords: Corneal blindness; corneal transplantation; eye banking; graft rejection; keratoplasty; visual acuity.

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagrammatic representation of anatomical layers of the cornea (Drawn by the authors based on the theoretical knowledge of the corneal anatomy).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart showing the evolution of corneal transplantation. Source: Ref. .
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flowchart depicting a stepwise approach while planning surgical management in a case of corneal opacity. SALK, superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty; HALK, hemi-automated lamellar keratoplasty; ALTK, automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, DSAEK, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, DMEK, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diagrammatic representation of the type of keratoplasty depending the on the level of corneal opacities along with endothelial function (Drawn by the authors based on the practical knowledge utilized for decision making in cases of corneal opacity). SALK, superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty; ALTK, automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Diagrammatic representation of the type of keratoplasty to be chosen for cases of corneal decompensation with compromised endothelium with and without stromal scarring. (Drawn by the authors based on the practical knowledge utilized for decision making in cases of corneal decompensation).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Post-operative clinical photograph of sutureless superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty (SALK) for healed keratitis with superficial opacity involving anterior 200 μm of cornea. The photograph demonstrates a well apposed clear lamellar graft.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Intra-operative pictures showing use of automated microkeratome for host dissection (A) and donor dissection (B) in case of automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty (ALTK).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Post-operative clinical photographs of a patient operated using automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty for right eye nebulomacular opacity.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Clinical pictures showing post-operative diffuse (left) and slit images (right) of automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty (with sutures). 10-0 nylon monofilament=0.020-0.029 mm thickness.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Intra-operative sequential steps of manual deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in case of advanced keratoconus. (A) Keratoconus with paracentral ectasia; (B) lamellar dissection with the aid of intra-operative optical coherence tomography; (C) donor preparation; (D) at the end of surgery intra-operative optical coherence tomography showing well-apposed donor graft to host bed. OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Post-operative day 1 clinical picture of operated Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) showing well-apposed lenticule to host cornea.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Clinical photographs (A) showing operated penetrating keratoplasty with failed graft; (B) post-operative day one picture with clear graft and well-apposed graft-host junction.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Clinical photograph of a child with left eye congenital corneal opacity along with an intra-operative photograph showing a very well-defined posterior corneal defect confirming the diagnosis of Peter's anomaly.
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Intra-operative photograph showing the well-apposed Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) lenticule on intra-operative optical coherence tomography.
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Clinical picture showing operated keratoprosthesis (K-pro) with operated membranectomy for retroprosthetic membrane.

References

    1. Zirm EK. Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (A successful total keratoplasty).1906. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989;5:258–61.
    1. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:167–73.
    1. Dhanda RP, Kalevar V. Historical review. International ophthalmic clinics. Boston, MA: Little Brown Co; 1972. Corneal surgery; pp. 7–12.
    1. Von Hippel A. Eine neue methode der hornhauttransplantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1888;34:108–30.
    1. Trevor Roper PD. The history of corneal grafting. In: Casey TA, editor. Corneal grafting. London: Butterwork; 1972. pp. 1–5.
    1. Rycroft BW, Romanes GJ. Lamellar corneal grafts clinical report on 62 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1952;36:337–51.
    1. Moffatt SL, Cartwright VA, Stumpf TH. Centennial review of corneal transplantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33:642–57.
    1. Paufique L, Sourdille GP, Offret G. Les Greffes de la corne´e. Paris: Masson; 1948. p. 159.
    1. Barraquer JI. Queratomileusispara la correccion de la myopia. Arch Soc Am Oftalmol Optom. 1964;5:27–48.
    1. Barraquer JI. Lamellar keratoplasty. (Special techniques) Ann Ophthalmol. 1972;4:437–69.
    1. Kaufman HE. The correction of aphakia. XXXVI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;89:1–10.
    1. Kaufman HE, Insler MS, Ibrahim-Elzembely HA, Kaufman SC. Human fibrin tissue adhesive for sutureless lamellar keratoplasty and scleral patch adhesion: A pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2168–72.
    1. Archila EA. Deep lamellar keratoplasty dissection of host tissue with intrastromal air injection. Cornea. 1984;3:217–8.
    1. Vajpayee RB, Vasudendra N, Titiyal JS, Tandon R, Sharma N, Sinha R, et al. Automated lamellar therapeutic keratoplasty (ALTK) in the treatment of anterior to mid-stromal corneal pathologies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:771–3.
    1. Melles GR, Rietveld FJ, Beekhuis WH, Binder PS. A technique to visualize corneal incision and lamellar dissection depth during surgery. Cornea. 1999;18:80–6.
    1. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:398–403.
    1. Tillett CW. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1956;41:530–3.
    1. Barraquer J. Special methods in corneal surgery. In: King JH, McTigue JW, editors. The comea world congress. Washington, DC: Rutterworths; 1965. pp. 586–604.
    1. Ko WW, Freuh B, Shields C, Costello ML, Feldman ST. Experimental posterior lamellar transplantation of the rabbit cornea (ARVO abstract) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1102.
    1. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, Pels E, Rietveld FJ, Beekhuis WH, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 1998;17:618–26.
    1. Melles GR, Lander F, Nieuwendaal C. Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: A case report of a modified technique. Cornea. 2002;21:325–7.
    1. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: Early clinical results. Cornea. 2001;20:239–43.
    1. Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis) Cornea. 2004;23:286–8.
    1. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886–9.
    1. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) Cornea. 2006;25:987–90.
    1. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price FW., Jr Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2361–8.
    1. Darlington JK, Adrean SD, Schwab IR. Trends of penetrating keratoplasty in the United States from 1980 to 2004. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2171–5.
    1. Röck T, Landenberger J, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Röck D. The evolution of corneal transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2017;22:749–54.
    1. Zhang AQ, Rubenstein D, Price AJ, Côté E, Levitt M, Sharpen L, et al. Evolving surgical techniques of and indications for corneal transplantation in Ontario: 2000-2012. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48:153–9.
    1. Le R, Yucel N, Khattak S, Yucel YH, Prud'homme GJ, Gupta N, et al. Current indications and surgical approaches to corneal transplants at the University of Toronto: A clinical-pathological study. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52:74–9.
    1. Zare M, Javadi MA, Einollahi B, Karimian F, Rafie AR, Feizi S, et al. Changing indications and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation between 2004 and 2009 at a tertiary referral center. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012;19:323–9.
    1. Park CY, Lee JK, Gore PK, Lim CY, Chuck RS. Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-year review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2432–42.
    1. Gupta N, Vashist P, Tandon R, Gupta SK, Dwivedi S, Mani K, et al. Prevalence of corneal diseases in the rural Indian population: The corneal opacity rural epidemiological (CORE) study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:147–52.
    1. Fogla R, Padmanabhan P. Initial results of small incision deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:346–51.
    1. Dupps WJ, Jr, Qian Y, Meisler DM. Multivariate model of refractive shift in Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:578–84.
    1. Jun B, Kuo AN, Afshari NA, Carlson AN, Kim T. Refractive change after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery and its correlation with graft thickness and diameter. Cornea. 2009;28:19–23.
    1. Macsai MS, Kara-Jose AC. Suture technique for Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26:1123–6.
    1. Price MO, Price FW., Jr Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: Comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1936–42.
    1. Shah AK, Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM, Hoar KL, et al. Complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with intraocular lens exchange. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:390–70.
    1. Price MO, Baig KM, Brubaker JW, Price FW., Jr Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs.surgeon-dissected grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:36–41.
    1. O'Brien PD, Lake DB, Saw VP, Rostron CK, Dart JK, Allan BD, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: Case selection in the learning curve. Cornea. 2008;27:1114–8.
    1. Kobayashi A, Mawatari Y, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. In vivo laser confocal microscopy after Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:977–85.
    1. Patel SV, Baratz KH, Hodge DO, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW. The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:153–60.
    1. Chen ES, Shamie N, Terry MA, Hoar KL. Endothelial keratoplasty: Improvement of vision after healthy donor tissue exchange. Cornea. 2008;27:279–82.
    1. Hindman HB, McCally RL, Myrowitz E, Terry MA, Stark WJ, Weinberg RS, et al. Evaluation of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery using scatterometry and wavefront analyses. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2006–12.
    1. Thompson RW, Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, Price FW., Jr Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1396–402.
    1. Oster SF, Ebrahimi KB, Eberhart CG, Schein OD, Stark WJ, Jun AS, et al. A clinicopathologic series of primary graft failure after Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:609–14.
    1. Patel SV. Graft survival and endothelial outcomes in the new era of endothelial keratoplasty. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95:40–7.
    1. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Phillips PM, Friend DJ, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: The influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts. Cornea. 2008;27:1131–7.
    1. Price MO, Price FW., Jr Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:857–65.
    1. Terry MA, Aldave AJ, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Liang W, Ayala AR, Maguire MG, et al. Donor, recipient, and operative factors associated with graft success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1700–9.
    1. Arenas E, Esquenazi S, Anwar M, Terry M. Lamellar corneal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57:510–29.
    1. Soong HK, Fitzgerald J, Boruchoff SA, Sugar A, Meyer RF, Gabel MG, et al. Corneal hydrops in Terrien's marginal degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:340–3.
    1. Jordan CS, Price MO, Trespalacios R, Price FW., Jr Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: Part one: Clinical signs and symptoms. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:387–90.
    1. Allan BD, Terry MA, Price FW, Jr, Price MO, Griffin NB, Claesson M, et al. Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26:1039–42.
    1. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: Clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society Thesis) Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:530–63.
    1. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1541–8.
    1. Bessant DA, Dart JK. Lamellar keratoplasty in the management of inflammatory corneal ulceration and perforation. Eye (Lond) 1994;8(Pt 1):22–8.
    1. Saelens IE, Bartels MC, Van Rij G, Dinjens WN, Mooy CM. Introduction of epithelial cells in the flap-graft interface during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:936–7.
    1. Bansal R, Ramasubramanian A, Das P, Sukhija J, Jain AK. Intracorneal epithelial ingrowth after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and stromal puncture. Cornea. 2009;28:334–7.
    1. Phillips PM, Terry MA, Kaufman SC, Chen ES. Epithelial downgrowth after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:193–6.
    1. Koenig SB, Wirostko WJ, Fish RI, Covert DJ. Candida keratitis after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28:471–3.
    1. Noble BA, Agrawal A, Collins C, Saldana M, Brogden PR, Zuberbuhler B. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) Cornea. 2007;26:59–64.
    1. Amayem AF, Anwar M. Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:76–9.
    1. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: Surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet's membrane. Cornea. 2002;21:374–83.
    1. Coombes AGA, Kirwan JF, Rostron CK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with lympholised tissue in the management of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:778–91.
    1. Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, Bunce C, Craig E. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1676–82.
    1. Funnell CL, Ball J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2006;20:527–32.
    1. Trimarchi F, Poppi E, Klersy C, Piacentini C. Deep lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmologica. 2001;215:389–93.
    1. Sugita J, Kondo J. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:184–8.
    1. Maumenee AE. Clinical patterns of corneal graft failure. Ciba Found Symp. 1973;15:5–23.
    1. Al-Torbak A, Malak M, Teichmann KD, Wagoner MD. Presumed stromal graft rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2005;24:241–3.
    1. Brahma A, Ennis F, Harper R, Ridgway A, Tullo A. Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: A prospective longitudinal evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:60–6.
    1. Rahman I, Carley F, Hillarby C, Brahma A, Tullo AB. Penetrating keratoplasty: Indications, outcomes, and complications. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1288–94.
    1. Beckingsale P, Mavrikakis I, Al-Yousuf N, Mavrikakis E, Daya SM. Penetrating keratoplasty: Outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:728–31.
    1. DC, Sutphin JE, Farjo AA. Extended long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1633–8.
    1. Paglen PG, Fine M, Abbott RL, Webster RG., Jr The prognosis for keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:651–4.
    1. Olson RJ, Pingree M, Ridges R, Lundergan ML, Alldredge C, Jr, Clinch TE, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: A long-term review of results and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:987–91.
    1. Ho Wang Yin G, Hoffart L. Post-keratoplasty astigmatism management by relaxing incisions: a systematic review. Eye Vis (Lond) 2017;4:29.
    1. Brightbill FC, editor. Corneal surgery: Theory, technique and tissue. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993.
    1. Saini JS, Reddy MK, Jain A K, Ravindra M S, Jhaveria S, Raghuram L. Perspectives in eye banking. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1996;44:47–55.
    1. The Gazette of India. Transplantation of Human Organs Acts and Rules. [accessed on October 20, 2018]. pp. 1–72. Available from: .
    1. Tandon R, Singh A, Gupta N, Vanathi M, Gupta V. Upgradation and modernization of eye banking services: Integrating tradition with innovative policies and current best practices. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65:109–15.
    1. Tandon R, Verma K, Vanathi M, Pandey RM, Vajpayee RB. Factors affecting eye donation from postmortem cases in a tertiary care hospital. Cornea. 2004;23:597–601.
    1. Impact of eye donation counselors and trained nurses in hospital cornea retrieval program. [accessed on October 20, 2018]. Available form: .
    1. Panda A, Satpathy G, Sethi HS. Survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in M-K preserved corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:679–83.
    1. Steven P, Le Blanc C, Lankenau E, Krug M, Oelckers S, Heindl LM, et al. Optimising deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using intraoperative online optical coherence tomography (iOCT) Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:900–4.
    1. Pasricha ND, Shieh C, Carrasco-Zevallos OM, Keller B, Izatt JA, Toth CA, et al. Real-time microscope-integrated OCT to improve visualization in DSAEK for advanced bullous keratopathy. Cornea. 2015;34:1606–10.
    1. Juthani VV, Goshe JM, Srivastava SK, Ehlers JP. Association between transient interface fluid on intraoperative OCT and textural interface opacity after DSAEK surgery in the PIONEER study. Cornea. 2014;33:887–92.
    1. Farid M, Steinert RF. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty performed with the femtosecond laser zigzag incision for the treatment of stromal corneal pathology and ectatic disease. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:809–13.
    1. Shousha MA, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Ide T, Feuer W, Karp CL, et al. Long-term results of femtosecond laser-assisted sutureless anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:315–23.
    1. Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Koreishi A, Ide T, Goldman D, Karp CL, et al. Femtosecond laser–assisted sutureless anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1303–7.
    1. Wirbelauer C, Winkler J, Bastian GO, Häberle H, Pham DT. Histopathological correlation of corneal diseases with optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:727–34.
    1. Griffith M, Jackson WB, Lagali N, Merrett K, Li F, Fagerholm P, et al. Artificial corneas: A regenerative medicine approach. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1985–9.
    1. Carlsson DJ, Li F, Shimmura S, Griffith M. Bioengineered corneas: How close are we? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:192–7.
    1. Buznyk O, Pasyechnikova N, Islam MM, Iakymenko S, Fagerholm P, Griffith M, et al. Bioengineered corneas grafted as alternatives to human donor corneas in three high-risk patients. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8:558–62.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe