Tibiopedal arterial minimally invasive retrograde revascularization (TAMI) in patients with peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia. On behalf of the Peripheral Registry of Endovascular Clinical Outcomes (PRIME)

Jihad A Mustapha, Fadi Saab, Theresa N McGoff, George Adams, John R Mullins, Ashraf Al-Dadah, Michael R Jaff, Philip P Goodney, Farhan Khawaja, Larry J Diaz-Sandoval, Jihad A Mustapha, Fadi Saab, Theresa N McGoff, George Adams, John R Mullins, Ashraf Al-Dadah, Michael R Jaff, Philip P Goodney, Farhan Khawaja, Larry J Diaz-Sandoval

Abstract

Objectives and background: Complex peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular techniques have become prevalent in treatment of advanced PAD and CLI, and use of techniques such as tibiopedal minimally invasive revascularization (TAMI), have been proven safe in small, single-center series. However, its use has not been systematically compared to traditional approaches.

Methods and results: This is a retrospective, multicenter analysis which enrolled 744 patients with advanced PAD and CLI who underwent 1,195 endovascular interventions between January 2013 and April 2018. Data was analyzed based on access used for revascularization: 840 performed via femoral access, 254 via dual access, and 101 via TAMI. The dual access group had the highest median Rutherford Class and lowest number of patent tibial vessels. Median fluoroscopy time, procedure time, hospital stay, and contrast volume were significantly lower in the TAMI access group when compared to both femoral/dual access groups. There was also a significant difference between all groups regarding location of target lesions: Femoropopliteal lesions were most commonly treated via femoral access; infrapopliteal lesions, via TAMI, and multilevel lesions via dual access.

Conclusions: Stand-alone TAMI or tibial access as an integral part of a dual access treatment strategy, is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with advanced PAD and CLI who have infrapopliteal lesions. Larger prospective and randomized studies may be useful to further validate this approach.

Keywords: critical limb ischemia; endovascular; peripheral artery disease; radiation safety; tibial access.

© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:1329-1340.
    1. Becker F, Robert-Ebadi H, Ricco JB, et al. Chapter I: definitions, epidemiology, clinical presentation and prognosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(suppl 2):S4-S12.
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(suppl S):S5-S67.
    1. Farber A. Chronic limb threatening ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:171-180.
    1. Agarwal S, Sud K, Shishehbor MH. Nationwide trends of hospital admission and outcomes among critical limb ischemia patients: from 2003-2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1901-1913.
    1. Mustapha JA, Saab F, McGoff T, et al. Tibio-pedal arterial minimally invasive retrograde revascularization in patients with advanced peripheral vascular disease: the TAMI technique, original case series. Catheteriz Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:987-994.
    1. Mustapha JA, Saab F, Diaz-Sandoval L, et al. The peripheral registry of endovascular clinical outcomes (the PRIME registry): interim analysis of the first 328 subjects with critical limb ischemia. Vasc Dis Manag. 2017;14:E55-E66.
    1. Iida O, Nakamura M, Yamauchi Y, et al. Endovascular treatment for infrainguinal vessels in patients with critical limb ischemia: olive registry, a prospective, multicenter study in Japan with 12-month follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:68-76.
    1. Swaminathan A, Vemulapalli S, Patel MR, Schuyler Jones W. Lower extremity amputation in peripheral artery disease: improving patient outcomes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014;10:417-424.
    1. van Netten JJ, Fortington LV, Hinchliffe RJ, Hijmans JM. Early post-operative mortality after major lower limb amputation: a systematic review of population and regional based studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:248-257.
    1. Armstrong EJ, Ryan MP, Baker ER, Martinsen BJ, Kotlarz H, Gunnarsson C. Risk of major amputation or death among patients with critical limb ischemia initially treated with endovascular intervention, surgical bypass, minor amputation, or conservative management. J Med Econ. 2017;20:1148-1154.
    1. Peacock JM, Keo HH, Duval S, et al. The incidence and health economic burden of ischemic amputation in Minnesota, 2005-2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8:A141.
    1. Mustapha JA, Katzen B, Neville R, et al. Determinants of long-term outcomes and costs in the management of critical limb ischemia: a population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e009724.
    1. Saab F, Jaff MR, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, et al. Chronic total occlusion crossing approach based on plaque cap morphology: the CTOP classification. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:284-291.
    1. Mustapha JA, Finton S, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Saab FA, Miller LE. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with infrapopliteal arterial disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003468.
    1. Shammas NW, Lam R, Mustapha J, et al. Comparison of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs. balloon angioplasty alone in patients with critical limb ischemia: results of the CALCIUM 360 randomized pilot trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:480-488.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe