The effects of selected ankle appliances on postural control

S J Kinzey, C D Ingersoll, K L Knight, S J Kinzey, C D Ingersoll, K L Knight

Abstract

Objective: Although ankle braces supposedly protect the ankle by providing mechanical support of the joint and enhancing proprioceptive input, their proprioceptive effects are unclear. Measuring the center of pressure during posture provides a reasonably well-controlled evaluation of proprioceptive input at the ankle. We, therefore, compared the changes in the center of pressure resulting from wearing ankle braces and wearing no brace (control).

Design and setting: Center-of-pressure variables were measured during a one-legged modified Romberg test with six variations. The six test conditions systematically altered the three sensory modalities that control posture: visual input, vestibular input, and proprioceptive input. Subjects performed three 16-second trials of each Romberg variation for each brace condition.

Subjects: Twenty-four male volunteers (age = 18 to 26 yr) with no history of ankle injuries in the past 5 years and no difficulty with balance.

Measurements: Center of pressure, transmitted through the bottom of the foot, was monitored during each trial and transformed into total distance traveled, anterior-posterior (AP) position, and medial-lateral (ML) position.

Results: Average AP and ML center-of-pressure positions were increased only during brace wearing when all sensory modalities were functioning normally (control condition). Total center-of-pressure distance was the same for all three brace conditions.

Conclusions: Our results do not support or refute the concept that bracing enhances proprioception. The fact that subjects relocated their center of pressure only during the control condition is perplexing. If braces were to enhance proprioception, one would expect to see lower average ML and average AP center-of-pressure values when comparing the braced with the unbraced conditions. Alternatively, the relocated position may represent a more stable position resulting from enhanced proprioception.

References

    1. Am J Sports Med. 1976 Jul-Aug;4(4):136-41
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Apr;73(4):348-54
    1. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1990 Oct;37(5):1175-85
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1990 Mar;24(1):47-50
    1. Clin Sports Med. 1988 Jan;7(1):29-36
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;17(1):118-22
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1988 May-Jun;16(3):228-33
    1. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(6):833-9
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jun;55(6):1369-81
    1. Phys Ther. 1986 Oct;66(10):1548-50
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1985 Jul-Aug;13(4):259-62
    1. Med Sci Sports. 1973 Fall;5(3):200-3
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965 Nov;47(4):678-85
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1984 Nov-Dec;12(6):441-6
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1983;49(3):393-409
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16(1):64-6
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Dec;20(6):287-95
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):223-9
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1977 Nov-Dec;5(6):241-2

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe