"Like before, but not exactly": the Qualy-REACT qualitative inquiry into the lived experience of long COVID

Margherita Schiavi, Stefania Fugazzaro, Anna Bertolini, Monica Denti, Carlotta Mainini, Monia Allisen Accogli, Ginevra Bedogni, Daniele Ghizzoni, Otmen Esseroukh, Cecilia Gualdi, Stefania Costi, Margherita Schiavi, Stefania Fugazzaro, Anna Bertolini, Monica Denti, Carlotta Mainini, Monia Allisen Accogli, Ginevra Bedogni, Daniele Ghizzoni, Otmen Esseroukh, Cecilia Gualdi, Stefania Costi

Abstract

Background: Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) affect millions of individuals worldwide. Rehabilitation interventions could support individuals during the recovery phase of COVID-19, but a comprehensive understanding of this new disease and its associated needs is crucial. This qualitative study investigated the experience of individuals who had been hospitalized for COVID-19, focusing on those needs and difficulties they perceived as most urgent.

Methods: This naturalistic qualitative study was part of a single-center mix-method cross-sectional study (REACT) conducted in Italy during the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The qualitative data collection took place through a telephone interview conducted 3 months after hospital discharge. The experience of individuals discharged after hospitalization for COVID-19 was investigated through the main research question - "Tell me, how has it been going since you were discharged?". Two secondary questions investigated symptoms, activities, and participation. Data were recorded and transcribed verbatim within 48 h. An empirical phenomenological approach was used by the researchers, who independently analyzed the data and, through consensus, developed an interpretative model to answer the research question. Translation occurred after data was analyzed.

Results: During the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, 784 individuals with COVID-19 were discharged from the hospitals of the Local Health Authority of the Province of Reggio Emilia (Italy); 446 were excluded due to the presence of acute or chronic conditions causing disability other than COVID-19 (n. 339), inability to participate in the study procedures (n. 56), insufficient medical documentation to allow for screening (n. 21), discharge to residential facilities (n. 25), and pregnancy (n. 5). Overall, 150 individuals consented to participate in the REACT study, and 56 individuals (60.7% male, average age 62.8 years ±11.8) were interviewed in June-July 2020, up to data saturation. Persistent symptoms, feelings of isolation, fear and stigma, emotional distress, a fatalistic attitude, and return to (adapted) life course were the key themes that characterized the participants' experience after hospital discharge.

Conclusions: The experience as narrated by the participants in this study confirms the persistence of symptoms described in PASC and highlights the sense of isolation and psychological distress. These phenomena may trigger a vicious circle, but the participants also reported adaptation processes that allowed them to gradually return to their life course. Whether all individuals are able to rapidly activate these mechanisms and whether rehabilitation can help to break this vicious circle by improving residual symptoms remain to be seen.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.com NCT04438239.

Keywords: COVID-19; Hospitalization; Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome; Qualitative research; SARS-CoV-2.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram qualy-REACT study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Psychosocial implications of the recovery phase from COVID-19

References

    1. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533–534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1.
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, et al. China medical treatment expert group for Covid-19. clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in china. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
    1. World Health Organisation, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report 46, 6th March 2020. .
    1. Collins FS. NIH launches new initiative to study “long COVID”. 2021.
    1. Maxwell E. A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid 19 symptoms (often called long Covid) NIHR Centre for Engagement and Dissemination; 2020. Living with Covid 19.
    1. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(6):e4–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.029.
    1. Goërtz YMJ, Van Herck M, Delbressine JM, Vaes AW, Meys R, Machado FVC, et al. Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome? ERJ Open Res. 2020;6(4):00542–02020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00542-2020.
    1. van den Borst B, Peters JB, Brink M, Schoon Y, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Schers H, et al. Comprehensive health assessment three months after recovery from acute COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020:ciaa1750. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1750 Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33220049; PMCID: PMC7717214.
    1. Townsend L, Dyer AH, Jones K, Dunne J, Mooney A, Gaffney F, et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. Plos One. 2020;15(11):e0240784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240784.
    1. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F. Gemelli against COVID-19 post-acute care study group. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(6):603–605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603.
    1. Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group. Morin L, Savale L, Pham T, Colle R, Figueiredo S, et al. Four-month clinical status of a cohort of patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. JAMA. 2021;325(15):1525–1534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3331.
    1. Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R, Garnham R, Jones PW, Wedzicha JA. Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1999;54(7):581–586. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.7.581.
    1. Learmonth YC, Dlugonski D, Pilutti LA, Sandroff BM, Klaren R, Motl RW. Psychometric properties of the fatigue severity scale and the modified fatigue impact scale. J Neurol Sci. 2013;331(1–2):102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.023.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
    1. Paltrinieri S. MSc thesis in rehabilitation science. Italy: University of Florence; 2021. Cross-cultural validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) in Italian: translation and pilot study.
    1. Glaser BG. Naturalist inquiry and grounded theory. Historical social research/Historische Sozialforschung. 2007. pp. 114–132.
    1. Creswell JW, Báez JC. In: 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2020. Scripting a qualitative purpose statement and research questions (chapter 12)
    1. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
    1. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.
    1. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care a. are the results of the study valid? Evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA. 2000;284(3):357–362. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.3.357.
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1985. pp. 289–331.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Humphreys H, Kilby L, Kudiersky N, Copeland R. Long COVID and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e047632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047632.
    1. Costi S, Paltrinieri S, Bressi B, Fugazzaro S, Giorgi Rossi P, Mazzini E. Poor sleep during the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010306.
    1. Gardner PJ, Moallef P. Psychological impact on SARS survivors: critical review of the English language literature. Can Psychol/Psychologie canadienne. 2015;56(1):123–135. doi: 10.1037/a0037973.
    1. Ahmed H, Patel K, Greenwood DC, Halpin S, Lewthwaite P, Salawu A, et al. Long-term clinical otcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(5):jrm00063. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2694.
    1. Einvik G, Dammen T, Ghanima W, Heir T, Stavem K. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Post-Traumatic Stress in Hospitalized and Non-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042079.
    1. Herridge MS, Moss M, Hough CL, Hopkins RO, Rice TW, Bienvenu OJ, et al. Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(5):725–738. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4321-8.
    1. Almutairi AF, Adlan AA, Balkhy HH, Abbas OA, Clark AM. “It feels like I’m the dirtiest person in the world.”: Exploring the experiences of healthcare providers who survived MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11(2):187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.06.011.
    1. Gronholm PC, Nosé M, van Brakel WH, Eaton J, Ebenso B, Fiekert K, Milenova M, Sunkel C, Barbui C, Thornicroft G. Reducing stigma and discrimination associated with COVID-19: early stage pandemic rapid review and practical recommendations. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021;30:e15. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000056.
    1. Cheng SK, Sheng B, Lau KK, Wong CW, Ng YK, Li HL, et al. Adjustment outcomes in Chinese patients following one-month recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004;192(12):868–871. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000147169.03998.dc.
    1. Tansey CM, Louie M, Loeb M, Gold WL, Muller MP, de Jager J, et al. One-year outcomes and health care utilization in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(12):1312–1320. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.12.1312.
    1. Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(4):391–398. doi: 10.1002/nur.20259.
    1. Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4(1):107–118. doi: 10.1177/1468794104041110.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe