Expanding the obesity research paradigm to reach African American communities

Shiriki K Kumanyika, Melicia C Whitt-Glover, Tiffany L Gary, T Elaine Prewitt, Angela M Odoms-Young, Joanne Banks-Wallace, Bettina M Beech, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Njeri Karanja, Kristie J Lancaster, Carmen D Samuel-Hodge, Shiriki K Kumanyika, Melicia C Whitt-Glover, Tiffany L Gary, T Elaine Prewitt, Angela M Odoms-Young, Joanne Banks-Wallace, Bettina M Beech, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Njeri Karanja, Kristie J Lancaster, Carmen D Samuel-Hodge

Abstract

Obesity is more prevalent among African Americans and other racial and ethnic minority populations than among whites. The behaviors that determine weight status are embedded in the core social and cultural processes and environments of day-to-day life in these populations. Therefore, identifying effective, sustainable solutions to obesity requires an ecological model that is inclusive of relevant contextual variables. Race and ethnicity are potent stratification variables in U.S. society and strongly influence life contexts, including many aspects that relate to eating and physical activity behaviors. This article describes a synthesis initiated by the African American Collaborative Obesity Research Network (AACORN) to build and broaden the obesity research paradigm. The focus is on African Americans, but the expanded paradigm has broader implications and may apply to other populations of color. The synthesis involves both community and researcher perspectives, drawing on and integrating insights from an expanded set of knowledge domains to promote a deeper understanding of relevant contexts. To augment the traditional, biomedical focus on energy balance, the expanded paradigm includes insights from family sociology, literature, philosophy, transcultural psychology, marketing, economics, and studies of the built environment. We also emphasize the need for more attention to tensions that may affect African American or other researchers who identify or are identified as members of the communities they study. This expanded paradigm, for which development is ongoing, poses new challenges for researchers who focus on obesity and obesity-related health disparities but also promises discovery of new directions that can lead to new solutions.

Figures

Figure:
Figure:
AACORN's Expanded Obesity Research Paradigm.

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA. 2006;295(13):1549–1555.
    1. Strategic Plan for NIH Obesity Research. National Institutes of Health; Bethesda (MD): [March 17, 2007]. .
    1. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Ogden CL, Dietz WH. Racial and ethnic differences in secular trends for childhood BMI, weight, and height. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14(2):301–308.
    1. Bish CL, Blanck HM, Serdula MK, Marcus M, Kohl HW, 3rd, Khan LK. Diet and physical activity behaviors among Americans trying to lose weight: 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Obes Res. 2005;13(3):596–607.
    1. McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton AJ, et al. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):933–949.
    1. Whitlock EP, Williams SB, Gold R, Smith PR, Shipman SA. Screening and interventions for childhood overweight: a summary of evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2005;116(1):e125–e144.
    1. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl 2):51S–209S. [Published erratum in: Obes Res 1998;6(6):464]
    1. Kumanyika SK. Obesity treatment in minorities. In: Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, editors. Handbook of obesity treatment. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Guilford Publications, Inc.; 2002. pp. 416–446.
    1. Kumanyika SK. Chapter 3, Cultural differences as influences in obesity treatment. In: Bray GA, Bouchard C, editors. Handbook of obesity: clinical applications. Vol. 1. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker; 2004. pp. 45–67.
    1. Bronner Y, Boyington JE. Developing weight loss interventions for African-American women: elements of successful models. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(4):224–235.
    1. Yancey AK, Kumanyika SK, Ponce NA, McCarthy WJ, Fielding JE, Leslie JP, et al. Population-based interventions engaging communities of color in healthy eating and active living: a review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004;1(1):A09. .
    1. Booth SL, Sallis JF, Ritenbaugh C, Hill JO, Birch LL, Frank LD, et al. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: rationale, influences, and leverage points. Nutr Rev. 2001;59(3 Pt 2):S21-39; S57-65.
    1. Kumanyika SK. Minisymposium on obesity: overview and some strategic considerations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:293–308.
    1. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:309–335.
    1. Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med. 1999;29(6 Pt 1):563–570.
    1. Smelser JN, Wilson WJ, Mitchell F. America becoming. Racial trends and their consequences. Vol II. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
    1. Kumanyika SK, Gary TL, Lancaster KJ, Samuel-Hodge CD, Banks-Wallace J, Beech BM, et al. Achieving healthy weight in African American communities: research priorities and perspectives. Obes Res. 2005;13(12):2037–2047.
    1. McLoyd VC, Hill NE, Dodge KA. African American family life. Ecological and cultural diversity. Guilford Press; New York (NY): 2005.
    1. Think tank on enhancing obesity research at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Executive summary. Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2004. [March 18, 2007]. .
    1. Roy Elveton. "Lebenswelt [Lifeworld]." The Literary Encyclopedia. Carleton College; [March 18, 2007]. .
    1. Health, United States, 2006. With chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2006.
    1. Hooks B. Sisters of the yam: black women and self-recovery. Boston (MA): South End Press; 1993.
    1. Hahn RA. Chapter 1, Anthropology and the enhancement of public health practice. In: Hahn RA, Harris KW, editors. Anthropology and public health. Oxford University Press; New York (NY): 1999. pp. 3–24.
    1. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Gartlehner G, Lohr KN, Griffith D, et al. Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Summary, evidence report/technology assessment: no. 99. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. .
    1. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.
    1. Smith LT. Decolonizing methodologies. Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books, Ltd; London (UK): 1999.
    1. Airhihenbuwa CO. Health and culture. Beyond the western paradigm. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995.
    1. Kumanyika S, Grier S. Targeting interventions for low income and ethnic minority children. Future Child. 2006;16(1):187–207.
    1. Taylor WC, Poston WSC, Jones L, Kraft MK. Environmental justice. Obesity, physical activity, and healthy eating. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(Suppl 1):S30–S54.
    1. Kumanyika S. Obesity, health disparities, and prevention paradigms: hard questions and hard choices. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(4):A02. .
    1. African American Collaborative Obesity Research Network. Participatory research on African American community weight issues: defining the state of the art. Summary. Second AACORN invited workshop 2006 Aug 14-15 Philadelphia, PA =

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe