Does Training and Support of General Practitioners in Intensive Treatment of People with Screen-Detected Diabetes Improve Medication, Morbidity and Mortality in People with Clinically-Diagnosed Diabetes? Investigation of a Spill-Over Effect in a Cluster RCT

Morten Charles, Mette V Skriver, Simon J Griffin, Rebecca K Simmons, Daniel R Witte, Else-Marie Dalsgaard, Torsten Lauritzen, Annelli Sandbæk, Morten Charles, Mette V Skriver, Simon J Griffin, Rebecca K Simmons, Daniel R Witte, Else-Marie Dalsgaard, Torsten Lauritzen, Annelli Sandbæk

Abstract

Introduction: Very few studies have examined the potential spill-over effect of a trial intervention in general practice. We investigated whether training and support of general practitioners in the intensive treatment of people with screen-detected diabetes improved rates of redeemed medication, morbidity and mortality in people with clinically-diagnosed diabetes.

Methods: This is a secondary, post-hoc, register-based analysis linked to a cluster randomised trial. In the ADDITION-Denmark trial, 175 general practices were cluster randomised (i) to routine care, or (ii) to receive training and support in intensive multifactorial treatment of individuals with screen-detected diabetes (2001 to 2009). Using national registers we identified all individuals who were diagnosed with clinically incident diabetes in the same practices over the same time period. (Patients participating in the ADDITION trial were excluded). We compared rates of redeemed medication, a cardiovascular composite endpoint, and all-cause mortality between the routine care and intensive treatment groups.

Results: In total, 4,107 individuals were diagnosed with clinically incident diabetes in ADDITION-Denmark practices between 2001 and 2009 (2,051 in the routine care group and 2,056 in the intensive treatment group). There were large and significant increases in the proportion of patients redeeming cardio-protective medication in both treatment groups during follow-up. After a median of seven years of follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of a composite cardiovascular endpoint (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.38) or all-cause mortality between the two groups (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.23).

Discussion: There was no evidence of a spill-over effect from an intervention promoting intensive treatment of people with screen-detected diabetes to those with clinically-diagnosed diabetes. Overall, the proportion of patients redeeming cardio-protective medication during follow-up was similar in both groups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00237549.

Conflict of interest statement

MC is supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. DRW and RKS are supported by the Danish Diabetes Academy, which is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. DRW reports receiving lecture fees from Novo Nordisk A/S and Steno Diabetes Center. DRW and TL hold shares in Novo Nordisk A/S. TL reports receiving a fee for attending an international board meeting for Astra Zeneca on early detection and treatment of diabetes in 2015. AS reports receiving lecture fees for providing continuing medical education to GPs. SJG’s research programme is supported by MRC Epidemiology Unit core funding (MC_UU_12015/4). SJG is an NIHR Senior Investigator and member of the NIHR School for Primary Care Research. SJG receives an honorarium and reimbursement of travel expenses from Eli Lilly associated with membership of an independent data monitoring committee for a randomised trial of a medication to lower glucose. SJG received an honorarium from Janssen for speaking at an educational meeting in 2015. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow of GP-Practices included in…
Fig 1. Flow of GP-Practices included in the Danish arm of the ADDITION trial and number of patients identified with clinically incident diabetes from the Danish National Diabetes Register (DNDR) during the intervention period of the ADDITION trial (2001–2009).
*Patients with screen-detected diabetes included in the ADDITION Trial. Pts = patients.
Fig 2. Cumulative incidence of a composite…
Fig 2. Cumulative incidence of a composite CVD endpoint (CVD death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke) among individuals diagnosed with clinically-incident diabetes from ADDITION-Denmark general practices by treatment groups from 2001–2012.
(Blue line = Intensive treatment group, Red line = Routine care group).
Fig 3. Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality…
Fig 3. Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality among individuals diagnosed with clinically-incident diabetes from ADDITION-Denmark general practices by the treatment group from 2001–2013.
(Blue line = Intensive treatment group, Red line = Routine care group).

References

    1. 2016) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016. Diabetes Care 39 Suppl 1: S1–S2. 39/Supplement_1/S1 [pii];.
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 362: 1225–1230. S0140-6736(03)14546-1 [pii];. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1
    1. Cantillon P, Jones R (1999) Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? BMJ 318: 1276–1279.
    1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C (2004) Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 8: iii–72. 94-08-29 [pii].
    1. Lauritzen T, Griffin S, Borch-Johnsen K, Wareham NJ, Wolffenbuttel BH, Rutten G (2000) The ADDITION study: proposed trial of the cost-effectiveness of an intensive multifactorial intervention on morbidity and mortality among people with Type 2 diabetes detected by screening. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24 Suppl 3: S6–11.
    1. Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, Khunti K, Rutten GE, Sandbaek A, Sharp SJ, Simmons RK, van den Donk M, Wareham NJ, Lauritzen T (2011) Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 378: 156–167. S0140-6736(11)60698-3 [pii];. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60698-3
    1. Rasmussen SS, Glumer C, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Borch-Johnsen K (2008) General effect on high-risk persons when general practitioners are trained in intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes. Scand J Prim Health Care 26: 166–173. 795457059 [pii];. 10.1080/02813430802264624
    1. Sibley JC, Sackett DL, Neufeld V, Gerrard B, Rudnick KV, Fraser W (1982) A randomized trial of continuing medical education. N Engl J Med 306: 511–515. 10.1056/NEJM198203043060904
    1. Charles M, Ejskjaer N, Witte DR, Borch-Johnsen K, Lauritzen T, Sandbaek A (2011) Prevalence of Neuropathy and Peripheral Arterial Disease and the Impact of Treatment in People With Screen-Detected Type 2 Diabetes: The ADDITION-Denmark study. Diabetes Care 34: 2244–2249. dc11-0903 [pii];. 10.2337/dc11-0903
    1. Royal College of General practitioners in Denmark (1999) Type 2 diabetes in general practice—Diagnosis and treatment.
    1. Royal College of General practitioners in Denmark. (2004) Type 2 diabetes in general practice—An evidence based guideline.
    1. Kildemoes HW, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (2011) The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 39: 38–41. 39/7_suppl/38 [pii];. 10.1177/1403494810394717
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40: 373–383.
    1. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Moher D, Turner L, Galipeau J, Halperin I, Vachon B, Ramsay T, Manns B, Tonelli M, Shojania K (2012) Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 379: 2252–2261. S0140-6736(12)60480-2 [pii];. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2
    1. Lauritzen T, Sandbaek A, Carlsen AH, Borch-Johnsen K (2012) All-cause mortality and pharmacological treatment intensity following a high risk screening program for diabetes. A 6.6 year follow-up of the ADDITION study, Denmark. Prim Care Diabetes 6: 193–200. S1751-9918(12)00047-2 [pii];. 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.04.005
    1. Green A, Sortso C, Jensen PB, Emneus M (2015) Validation of the danish national diabetes register. Clin Epidemiol 7: 5–15. clep-7-005 [pii]. 10.2147/CLEP.S72768

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe