Automated Text Messaging With Patients in Department of Veterans Affairs Specialty Clinics: Cluster Randomized Trial

Vera Yakovchenko, Timothy P Hogan, Thomas K Houston, Lorilei Richardson, Jessica Lipschitz, Beth Ann Petrakis, Chris Gillespie, D Keith McInnes, Vera Yakovchenko, Timothy P Hogan, Thomas K Houston, Lorilei Richardson, Jessica Lipschitz, Beth Ann Petrakis, Chris Gillespie, D Keith McInnes

Abstract

Background: Acceptability of mobile phone text messaging as a means of asynchronous communication between health care systems and patients is growing. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has adopted an automated texting system (aTS) for national rollout. The aTS allows providers to develop clinical texting protocols to promote patient self-management and allows clinical teams to monitor patient progress between in-person visits. Texting-supported hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has not been previously tested.

Objective: Guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), we developed an aTS HCV protocol and conducted a mixed methods, hybrid type 2 effectiveness implementation study comparing two programs supporting implementation of the aTS HCV protocol for medication adherence in patients with HCV.

Methods: Seven VA HCV specialty clinics were randomized to usual aTS implementation versus an augmented implementation facilitation program. Implementation process measures included facilitation metrics, usability, and usefulness. Implementation outcomes included provider and patient use of the aTS HCV protocol, and effectiveness outcomes included medication adherence, health perceptions and behaviors, and sustained virologic response (SVR).

Results: Across the seven randomized clinics, there were 293 facilitation events using a core set of nine implementation strategies (157 events in augmented implementation facilitation, 136 events in usual implementation). Providers found the aTS appropriate with high potential for scale-up but not without difficulties in startup, patient selection and recruitment, and clinic workflow integration. Patients largely found the aTS easy to use and helpful; however, low perceived need for self-management support contributed to high declination. Reach and use was modest with 197 patients approached, 71 (36%) enrolled, 50 (25%) authenticated, and 32 (16%) using the aTS. In augmented implementation facilitation clinics, more patients actively used the aTS HCV protocol compared with usual clinic patients (20% vs 12%). Patients who texted reported lower distress about failing HCV treatment (13/15, 87%, vs 8/15, 53%; P=.05) and better adherence to HCV medication (11/15, 73%, reporting excellent adherence vs 6/15, 40%; P=.06), although SVR did not differ by group.

Conclusions: The aTS is a promising intervention for improving patient self-management; however, augmented approaches to implementation may be needed to support clinician buy-in and patient engagement. Considering the behavioral, social, organizational, and technical scale-up challenges that we documented, successful and sustained implementation of the aTS may require implementation strategies that operate at the clinic, provider, and patient levels.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03898349; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03898349.

Keywords: digital health; digital medicine; eHealth; implementation facilitation; self-management; texting; veterans.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Vera Yakovchenko, Timothy P Hogan, Thomas K Houston, Lorilei Richardson, Jessica Lipschitz, Beth Ann Petrakis, Chris Gillespie, D Keith McInnes. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.08.2019.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of clinics in the study and participants, identified as texters and nontexters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Facilitation events over time by clinic and implementation arm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Texting engagement by implementation and facilitation arm. HCV: hepatitis C virus; aTS: automated texting system.

References

    1. Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.040.
    1. Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:393–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855.
    1. Househ M. The role of short messaging service in supporting the delivery of healthcare: an umbrella systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2014 Jul 18;22(2):140–150. doi: 10.1177/1460458214540908.
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Apr;15(3):231–240. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0099.
    1. Kannisto KA, Koivunen MH, Välimäki MA. Use of mobile phone text message reminders in health care services: a narrative literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(10):e222. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3442.
    1. Kirchner JE. Department of Veterans Affairs. [2019-07-19]. The use of facilitation as an implementation strategy .
    1. Berta W, Cranley L, Dearing JW, Dogherty EJ, Squires JE, Estabrooks CA. Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory. Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 06;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0.
    1. Ritchie MJ, Dollar KM, Kearney LK, Kirchner JE. Research and services partnerships: responding to needs of clinical operations partners: transferring implementation facilitation knowledge and skills. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 01;65(2):141–143. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300468.
    1. Lessard S, Bareil C, Lalonde L, Duhamel F, Hudon E, Goudreau J, Lévesque L. External facilitators and interprofessional facilitation teams: a qualitative study of their roles in supporting practice change. Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 16;11:97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0458-7.
    1. Stetler CB, Legro MW, Rycroft-Malone J, Bowman C, Curran G, Guihan M, Hagedorn H, Pineros S, Wallace CM. Role of “external facilitation” in implementation of research findings: a qualitative evaluation of facilitation experiences in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci. 2006 Oct 18;1:23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-23.
    1. Cottrell E, Chambers R, O'Connell P. Using simple telehealth in primary care to reduce blood pressure: a service evaluation. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001391.
    1. McInnes DK, Houston TK, Woods SS, Frisbee KL, Evans NC. Disseminating information systems across the Atlantic: collaboration between U.K. National Health Service and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Implementation Sci. 2015 Aug 14;10(S1):A62. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-10-S1-A62.
    1. Mathes T, Antoine S, Pieper D. Factors influencing adherence in Hepatitis-C infected patients: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Apr 15;14:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-203.
    1. Pawlotsky J. Hepatitis C virus resistance to direct-acting antiviral drugs in interferon-free regimens. Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec;151(1):70–86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.003.
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217–226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
    1. VA Office of Research & Development. 2011. [2019-07-19]. VHA Handbook 1058.05, VHA Operations Activities That May Constitute Research .
    1. Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15–20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015.
    1. Veterans Health Administration. [2019-07-26]. VHA Facility Complexity Model 2017 .
    1. Story M. Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive Technol. 1998;10(1):4–12.
    1. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, Proctor EK, Kirchner JE. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.
    1. Rogal SS, Yakovchenko V, Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Kirchner JE, Proctor EK, Gonzalez R, Park A, Ross D, Morgan TR, Chartier M, Chinman MJ. The association between implementation strategy use and the uptake of hepatitis C treatment in a national sample. Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 11;12(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0588-6.
    1. Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Apr;34(4):228–243.
    1. Haynes RB. A critical review of determinants of patient compliance with therapeutic regimens. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB, editors. Compliance with Therapeutic Regimens. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1976. pp. 26–39.
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3):246–252. doi: 10.1370/afm.842.
    1. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873–880. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9.
    1. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire 2018. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [2019-07-19]. .
    1. Mayberry LS, Gonzalez JS, Wallston KA, Kripalani S, Osborn CY. The ARMS-D out performs the SDSCA, but both are reliable, valid, and predict glycemic control. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Nov;102(2):96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.09.010.
    1. Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man-Machine Stud. 1993 Mar;38(3):475–487. doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1022.
    1. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Counseling Psychol. 1989;36(2):223–233. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.
    1. Hannon PA, Helfrich CD, Chan KG, Allen CL, Hammerback K, Kohn MJ, Parrish AT, Weiner BJ, Harris JR. Development and pilot test of the workplace readiness questionnaire, a theory-based instrument to measure small workplaces' readiness to implement wellness programs. Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jan;31(1):67–75. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141204-QUAN-604.
    1. Jacobs SR, Weiner BJ, Bunger AC. Context matters: measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups. Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 17;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-46.
    1. Wen K, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Brennan PF, Dinauer S, Johnson PR, Siegler T. Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(6):707–713. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005546.
    1. Brooke J. SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. 1996;189(194):4–7.
    1. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2016 Nov 29;5(1):80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.
    1. Harvey G, Loftus-Hills A, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Kitson A, McCormack B, Seers K. Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. J Adv Nurs. 2002 Mar;37(6):577–588.
    1. Baskerville NB, Liddy C, Hogg W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(1):63–74. doi: 10.1370/afm.1312.
    1. Davis MM, Howk S, Spurlock M, McGinnis PB, Cohen DJ, Fagnan LJ. A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: unless the toolkit is used it won’t help solve the problem. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 18;17(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2413-y.
    1. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC. Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice. Implement Sci. 2012 Jul 23;7:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-67.
    1. Hempel S, Miake-Lye I, Brega AG, Buckhold F, Hassell S, Nowalk MP, Rubenstein L, Schreiber K, Spector WD, Kilbourne AM, Ganz DA. Quality improvement toolkits: recommendations for development. Am J Med Qual. 2019 Jan 24;:1062860618822102. doi: 10.1177/1062860618822102.
    1. Miech EJ, Rattray NA, Flanagan ME, Damschroder L, Schmid AA, Damush TM. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118773261. doi: 10.1177/2050312118773261.
    1. Kirchner JE, Ritchie MJ, Pitcock JA, Parker LE, Curran GM, Fortney JC. Outcomes of a partnered facilitation strategy to implement primary care-mental health. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 4:904–912. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3027-2.
    1. Helfrich CD, Blevins D, Smith JL, Kelly PA, Hogan TP, Hagedorn H, Dubbert PM, Sales AE. Predicting implementation from organizational readiness for change: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 22;6:76. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-76.
    1. McHorney CA. The Adherence Estimator: a brief, proximal screener for patient propensity to adhere to prescription medications for chronic disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):215–238. doi: 10.1185/03007990802619425.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48.
    1. Witry M, Klein D, Alexander B, Franciscus C, Turvey C. Medication list discrepancies and therapeutic duplications among dual use veterans. Fed Pract. 2016 Sep;33(9):14–20.
    1. Rossi M, Feske U, Shaffer S, Kreutzer J. Polypharmacy e-consults: a method to assess medications and address polypharmacy in rural patients. Innov Aging. 2017 Jun 30;1(suppl_1):1156. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx004.4218.
    1. Nguyen KA, Haggstrom DA, Ofner S, Perkins SM, French DD, Myers LJ, Rosenman M, Weiner M, Dixon BE, Zillich AJ. Medication use among veterans across health care systems. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Dec 08;8(1):235–249. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-10-RA-0184.
    1. Connolly SL, Miller CJ, Koenig CJ, Zamora KA, Wright PB, Stanley RL, Pyne JM. Veterans' attitudes toward smartphone app use for mental health care: qualitative study of rurality and age differences. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 22;6(8):e10748. doi: 10.2196/10748.
    1. Health information technology: HHS should assess the effectiveness of its efforts to enhance patient access to and use of electronic health information (GAO-17-305) Washington: US Government Accountability Office; 2017. Mar 15, [2019-07-19]. .

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe