Total or partial tonsillar resection (tonsillectomy or tonsillotomy) to change the quality of life for adults with recurrent or chronic tonsillitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Aleksi Laajala, Paulus Tokola, Timo J Autio, Timo Koskenkorva, Mikko Tastula, Pasi Ohtonen, Esa Läärä, Olli-Pekka Alho, Aleksi Laajala, Paulus Tokola, Timo J Autio, Timo Koskenkorva, Mikko Tastula, Pasi Ohtonen, Esa Läärä, Olli-Pekka Alho

Abstract

Background: Tonsillar surgery has been used for decades to treat recurrent and chronic tonsillitis in adults. Recurrent and chronic tonsillitis result in disturbing symptoms, treatment costs, sick leave, and impaired quality of life (QoL). Theoretically, removing all or part of the altered pathological palatal lymphoid tissue alleviates the symptoms and enhances the QoL. Whether this is true with total or partial tonsillar resection (tonsillectomy (TE) and tonsillotomy (TT), respectively) has not been reported in a randomised trial yet.

Methods: We conduct a multicentre, partly blinded, randomised, 6-month, parallel-group clinical study including 285 adult participants referred to surgical treatment for chronic or recurrent tonsillitis. The participants will either have TE, TT or watchful waiting (WW). The primary outcome will be the difference between the mean disease-specific Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 (QoL questionnaire) scores at 6 months. Comparison is made firstly between the combined TE+TT and WW groups (superiority analysis), and secondly between the TE and TT groups (non-inferiority analysis).

Discussion: This study will add significant new information to the effects and harms of TE and TT procedures in the treatment of adults with chronic or recurrent tonsillitis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04657549.

Keywords: Chronic tonsillitis; Quality of life; Randomised controlled trial; Recurrent tonsillitis; Tonsillectomy; Tonsillotomy; Treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments. T1 = within 2 to 3 weeks of enrolment, T2 = 3 months follow-up, and T3 = 5–6 months. The study logbook is filled continuously in a mobile phone application between surgery and the end of follow-up for surgical groups and between enrolment and the end of follow-up for the control group. TOI-14 = Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory – 14, RAND-36 = Research and Development 36-item Health Survey.

References

    1. Skevas T, Klingmann C, Plinkert PK, Baumann I. Development and validation of the tonsillectomy outcome inventory 14. HNO. 2012;60(9):801-806. 10.1007/s00106-012-2545-7.
    1. Roplekar R, Van M, Hussain SS. Does the quality of life impact of tonsillitis correlate with SIGN guideline compliance? An assessment of range and normality. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(5):481–486. doi: 10.1111/coa.12573.
    1. Baumann I, Kucheida H, Blumenstock G, Zalaman IM, Maassen MM, Plinkert PK. Benefit from tonsillectomy in adult patients with chronic tonsillitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(6):556–559. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0009-y.
    1. Windfuhr JP. Indications for tonsillectomy stratified by the level of evidence. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;15:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/cto000136.
    1. McPherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of new england, england, and norway. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104.
    1. Ruohoalho J, Ostvoll E, Bratt M, et al. Systematic review of tonsil surgery quality registers and introduction of the nordic tonsil surgery register collaboration. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(6):1353–1363. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4945-0.
    1. Ericsson E, Ledin T, Hultcrantz E. Long-term improvement of quality of life as a result of tonsillotomy (with radiofrequency technique) and tonsillectomy in youths. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(7):1272–1279. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31805559e1.
    1. Bender B, Blassnigg EC, Bechthold J, et al. Microdebrider-assisted intracapsular tonsillectomy in adults with chronic or recurrent tonsillitis. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(10):2284–2290. doi: 10.1002/lary.25265.
    1. Gaudreau PA, Gessler EM. Intracapsular tonsillectomy for keratosis pharyngeous: a pilot study of postoperative recovery and surgical efficacy. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017;96(9):E6–E9. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600901.
    1. Scottish intercollegiate guidelines network 117 (2010) management of sore throat and indications for tonsillectomy. A national clinical guideline. . Updated 2010. Accessed 30.4., 2021.
    1. Nielutulehdus. käypä hoito-suositus.suomalaisen lääkäriseuran duodecimin, suomen yleislääketieteen yhdistyksen, SuomenOtolaryngologiyhdistyksen, suomen infektiolääkärit ry:N ja kliiniset mikrobiologitry:N asettama työryhmä. helsinki: Suomalainen lääkäriseura duodecim, 2013. . Updated 2018. Accessed 27.3., 2020.
    1. Little RJ, D'Agostino R, Cohen ML, et al. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1355–1360. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1203730.
    1. Terveyskylä. . Accessed 2.5., 2021.
    1. CureLisa. . Accessed 2.5., 2021.
    1. International society for Quality of life research. . Accessed 20 Jan 2020.
    1. Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments. . Accessed 21.1., 2020.
    1. Laajala A, Autio TJ, Ohtonen P, Alho OP, Koskenkorva TJ. Interpretation of tonsillectomy outcome inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(5):1499–1505. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05832-z.
    1. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–227. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020305.
    1. Anna-Mari A, Arja A, Juha T. RAND-36 terveyteen liittyvän elämänlaadun mittarina - mittarin luotettavuus ja suomalaiset väestöarvot. STAKES Tutkimuksia. 1999;101.
    1. Greene WH. Econometric analysis. 7th ed. Pearson; 2012. p. Chapter 19.
    1. Henningsen a. Estimating censored regression models in R using the censReg package. . Updated 2012. Accessed 31.5., 2021.
    1. Koskenkorva T, Koivunen P, Laara E, Alho OP. Predictive factors for quality of life after tonsillectomy among adults with recurrent pharyngitis: a prospective cohort study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2014;39(4):216–223. doi: 10.1111/coa.12263.
    1. Amin N, Lakhani R. Intracapsular versus extracapsular dissection tonsillectomy for adults: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(10):2325–2335. doi: 10.1002/lary.28435.
    1. Alho OP, Koivunen P, Penna T, Teppo H, Koskela M, Luotonen J. Tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;334(7600):939. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39140.632604.55.
    1. Koskenkorva T, Koivunen P, Koskela M, Niemela O, Kristo A, Alho OP. Short-term outcomes of tonsillectomy in adult patients with recurrent pharyngitis: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2013;185(8):331. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121852.
    1. Burton MJ, Glasziou PP. Tonsillectomy or adeno-tonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD001802. 10.1002/14651858.CD001802.pub2.
    1. van Staaij BK, van den Akker EH, van der Heijden GJ, Schilder AG, Hoes AW. Adenotonsillectomy for upper respiratory infections: evidence based? Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(1):19–25. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.047530.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, CONSORT Group The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001. Explore (NY) 2005;1(1):40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2004.11.001.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe