The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty

Anne F Mannion, Stephane Kämpfen, Urs Munzinger, Ines Kramers-de Quervain, Anne F Mannion, Stephane Kämpfen, Urs Munzinger, Ines Kramers-de Quervain

Abstract

Introduction: Patient's expectations are variably reported to influence self-rated outcome and satisfaction after medical treatment; this prospective study examined which of the following was the most important unique determinant of global outcome/satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): baseline expectations; fulfillment of expectations; or current symptoms and function.

Methods: One hundred and twelve patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (age, 67 +/- 9 years) completed a questionnaire about their expectations regarding months until full recovery, pain, and limitations in everyday activities after TKA surgery. Two years postoperatively, they were asked what the reality was for each of these domains, and rated the global outcome and satisfaction with surgery. Multivariable regression analyses using forward conditional selection of variables (and controlling for age, gender, other joint problems) identified the most significant determinants of outcome.

Results: Patients significantly underestimated the time for full recovery (expected 4.7 +/- 2.8 months, recalled actual time, 6.1 +/- 3.7 months; P = 0.005). They were also overly optimistic about the likelihood of being pain-free (85% expected it, 43% were; P < 0.05) and of not being limited in usual activities (52% expected it, 20% were; P < 0.05). Global outcomes were 46.2% excellent, 41.3% good, 10.6% fair and 1.9% poor. In multivariable regression, expectations did not make a significant unique contribution to explaining the variance in outcome/satisfaction; together with other joint problems, knee pain and function at 2 years postoperation predicted global outcome, and knee pain at 2 years predicted satisfaction.

Conclusions: In this group, preoperative expectations of TKA surgery were overly optimistic. The routine analysis of patient-orientated outcomes in practice should assist the surgeon to convey more realistic expectations to the patient during the preoperative consultation. In multivariable regression, expectations did not predict global outcome/satisfaction; the most important determinants were other joint problems and the patient's pain and functional status 2 years postoperatively.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time for recovery from total knee arthroplasty. Relationship between the expected time required to recover from the total knee arthroplasty and the actual time required to recover, as recalled 2 years postoperatively.

References

    1. Wright JG, Young NL. The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:974–983.
    1. Wright JG, Young NL, Waddell JP. The reliability and validity of the self-reported patient-specific index for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:829–837.
    1. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001;165:174–179.
    1. Pager CK. Expectations and outcomes in cataract surgery: a prospective test of 2 models of satisfaction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1788–1792. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.12.1788.
    1. Ross CK, Frommelt G, Hazelwood L, Chang RW. The role of expectations in patient satisfaction with medical care. J Health Care Mark. 1987;7:16–26.
    1. Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, McPherson K, Black NA. The role of expectations in patients' reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care. 1993;31:1043–1056. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00006.
    1. Koyama T, McHaffie JG, Laurienti PJ, Coghill RC. The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:12950–12955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408576102.
    1. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: the influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. J Pers. 1987;55:169–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00434.x.
    1. Linder-Pelz S. Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: a test of five hypothesis. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:583–589. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90312-4.
    1. Carr-Hill RA. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1992;14:236–249.
    1. Engel C, Hamilton NA, Potter PT, Zautra AJ. Impact of two types of expectancy on recovery from total knee replacement surgery (TKR) in adults with osteoarthritis. Behav Med. 2004;30:113–123. doi: 10.3200/BMED.30.3.113-123.
    1. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273–1279.
    1. Burton KE, Wright V, Richards J. Patients' expectations in relation to outcome of total hip replacment surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38:471–474. doi: 10.1136/ard.38.5.471.
    1. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90194-7.
    1. Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, Andrew G. Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:204–206. doi: 10.1308/003588403321661415.
    1. Katz JN, Phillips CB, Poss R, Harrast JJ, Fossel AH, Liang MH, Sledge CB. The validity and reliability of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1528–1534.
    1. Heiberger RM, Holland B, editors. Statistical Analysis and Data Display. New York, USA: Springer; 2004.
    1. Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998;316:1236–1238.
    1. Lutz GK, Butzlaff ME, Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Singer DE, Deyo RA. The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:740–744. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.10417.x.
    1. Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D. Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine. 2009;34:1590–1599. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52.
    1. de Groot KI, Boeke S, Passchier J. Preoperative expectations of pain and recovery in relation to postoperative disappointment in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Med Care. 1999;37:149–156. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00005.
    1. McGregor AH, Hughes SP. The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 2: patient expectations and satisfaction. Spine. 2002;27:1471–1476. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200207010-00019. discussion 1476-1477.
    1. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163–173.
    1. Pynsent PB, Adams DJ, Disney SP. The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:241–248. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15095.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. van Hooff ML, Geurts SA, Kompier MA, Taris TW. 'How fatigued do you currently feel?' Convergent and discriminant validity of a single-item fatigue measure. J Occup Health. 2007;49:224–234. doi: 10.1539/joh.49.224.
    1. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J. 2005;14:1014–1026. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0911-9.
    1. Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:902–909.
    1. Slover J, Abdu WA, Hanscom B, Weinstein JN. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2006;31:1974–1980. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229252.30903.b9.
    1. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1991.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe