Short- and long-term evaluation of mandibular dental arch dimensional changes in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances

Gaetana Raucci, Camila Pachêco-Pereira, Maryam Elyasi, Fabrizia d'Apuzzo, Carlos Flores-Mir, Letizia Perillo, Gaetana Raucci, Camila Pachêco-Pereira, Maryam Elyasi, Fabrizia d'Apuzzo, Carlos Flores-Mir, Letizia Perillo

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate short- and long-term mandibular dental arch changes in patients treated with a lip bumper during the mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances, compared with a matched control sample.

Materials and methods: Dental casts and lateral cephalograms obtained from 31 consecutively treated patients before (T0) and after (T1) lip bumper, after fixed appliances (T2), and a minimum of 3 years after fixed appliances (T3) were analyzed. The control group was matched as closely as possible. Arch width, arch perimeter, arch length, and incisor proclination were evaluated. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze changes in measurements over all four time points between treatment and control groups.

Results: Arch widths and crowding were always significantly different except at T2-T1. At T1-T0, only crowding decreased 3.2 mm while intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths increased by 3.8, 3.3, and 3.9 mm, respectively. Changes at T3-T2 showed a significant decrease of 2.1 mm for crowding and an increase of 3.5, 2.9, 2.7, and 0.8 mm for intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths and arch perimeter, respectively. Finally, at T3-T0, the reduction in crowding of 5.03 mm was significant and clinically important in the treated group. The differences between intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths were also significant (2.1, 3.8, and 3.6 mm, respectively). All those differences favored the treated group.

Conclusions: Mandibular dental arch dimensions were significantly changed after lip bumper treatment. At follow-up, all arch widths were slightly decreased, generating an increase of 0.4 mm in crowding, considered clinically irrelevant. Overall changes remained stable after an average 6.3-year follow-up.

Keywords: Dental arch dimensions; Lip bumper; Long-term; Mixed dentition; Stability.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mandibular dental casts at the four time periods: before treatment (A); post-lip bumper (B); post-fixed appliances (C); follow-up (D).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Arch width measurements: intercanine width (A); interpremolar width (B); intermolar width (C).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Arch length measurement (D).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Arch perimeter measurement.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8600827/bin/i0003-3219-86-5-753-f01.jpg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8600827/bin/i0003-3219-86-5-753-f02.jpg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8600827/bin/i0003-3219-86-5-753-f03.jpg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8600827/bin/i0003-3219-86-5-753-f04.jpg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8600827/bin/i0003-3219-86-5-753-f05.jpg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8600827/bin/i0003-3219-86-5-753-f06.jpg

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe