Mortality Assessment of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons: Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the ILLUMENATE Clinical Program at 3 Years

William A Gray, Michael R Jaff, Sahil A Parikh, Gary M Ansel, Marianne Brodmann, Prakash Krishnan, Mahmood K Razavi, Frank Vermassen, Thomas Zeller, Roseann White, Kenneth Ouriel, Mark A Adelman, Sean P Lyden, William A Gray, Michael R Jaff, Sahil A Parikh, Gary M Ansel, Marianne Brodmann, Prakash Krishnan, Mahmood K Razavi, Frank Vermassen, Thomas Zeller, Roseann White, Kenneth Ouriel, Mark A Adelman, Sean P Lyden

Abstract

Background: A recent summary-level meta-analysis comprising randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of femoropopliteal paclitaxel-coated balloon and stent intervention identified excess late mortality in the paclitaxel-treated patients.

Methods: We evaluated the safety of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) for femoropopliteal artery disease with an independently performed meta-analysis of patient-level data from all patients in the Stellarex femoropopliteal clinical program. To compare mortality after DCB or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), we aggregated data from 2 RCTs comprising 419 patients treated with DCB and 170 patients treated with PTA. In an additional analysis, data were aggregated from 6 poolable Stellarex DCB studies (2 RCTs, 3 single-arm studies, and 1 registry). All serious adverse events including deaths were adjudicated by a blinded, third-party, independent Clinical Events Committee. Kaplan-Meier estimates in the RCTs were compared with restricted mean survival time. Predictors of death were assessed with hazard ratios (HRs) and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the patients treated with DCB and PTA in the pooled RCT analysis, with the exception that the DCB cohort was younger (67.4±9.7 versus 69.4±9.4 years, P=0.02), smoked more frequently (86.6% versus 78.8%, P=0.02), and were less often treated for recurrent lesions (8.8% versus 14.7%, P=0.04). In the RCTs, patients treated with DCB had all-cause mortality rates that were not different from those of patients treated with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimates 1.8±0.7% versus 1.3±0.9%, 6.5±1.2% versus 5.9±1.9%, and 9.3±1.5% versus 9.9±2.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, P=0.86). All-cause mortality rates were similar in a 1906-patient pooled nonrandomized DCB data set (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2.1%, 4.9%, and 7.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). Clinical Events Committee-adjudicated causes of death were balanced between the DCB and PTA cohorts. Multivariable Cox modeling identified age (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08; P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-2.00; P=0.04), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.12-3.16; P=0.02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.33-3.01; P<0.001) as predictors of mortality. Paclitaxel exposure was unrelated to mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98-1.10; P=0.23).

Conclusions: The mortality rates for patients treated with the DCB and uncoated PTA were indistinguishable over 3-year follow-up. Additional patient-level, adequately powered meta-analyses with larger RCT data sets will be needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02110524, NCT01858363, NCT01858428, NCT03421561, NCT01912937, NCT01927068, and NCT02769273.

Keywords: mortality; paclitaxel; peripheral vascular diseases.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Hazard rates for mortality for drug-coated balloon arms of the 2 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). The Pivotal study and EU RCT had nearly identical hazard rates with an overall I2 of 0.0%, indicative of homogeneity. EU RCT indicates CVI Drug-coated Balloon European Randomized Clinical Trial; and PIVOTAL, Pivotal Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Hazard rates for mortality in patients treated with drug-coated balloons.A, The hazard rates for mortality in patients treated with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the 7 Stellarex studies. Patients treated with DCBs in the 7 Stellarex studies had an overall I2 of 47.3%, consistent with moderate heterogeneity. ILLUMENATE PK was an outlier, with a hazard rate of 0.10. B, Annualized hazard rates for mortality for patients treated with DCBs in the 6 Stellarex studies. After elimination of the PK study, the overall I2 decreased to 38.6%, reflecting moderately low heterogeneity in the 6 remaining studies. EU RCT indicates CVI Drug-coated Balloon European Randomized Clinical Trial; FIH, first in human; GLOBAL, Global Study of a Drug-coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive SFA and/or Popliteal Lesions; ISR, in-stent restenosis; PIVOTAL, Pivotal Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon; PK, pharmacokinetic; RCT, randomized, controlled trial; and SAVER-E, Stellarex Vascular E-Registry.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival in the pooled randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). The pooled RCTs show no significant differences in the survival rates in the 2 groups through 3-year (1080-day) follow-up. For further information about pooling, refer to the combining data sets section of the article. The P value tests the null hypothesis that restricted mean survival time (RSMT) for the 2 curves are equal vs the alternative that they are not equal. DCB indicates drug-coated balloon; and PTA, uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Survival through 3 years (1080 days) in the 6-study pooled data set. The ILLUMENATE PK study (Pharmacokinetic Study of Drug-coated Angioplasty Balloons in the Superficial Femoral or Popliteal Arteries) was excluded because there were no deaths. The Kaplan–Meier estimates are reported for each year. DCB indicates drug-coated balloon.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Survival through 3 years in the 4 nonrandomized, pooled studies. The 3-year mortality estimate for the ILLUMENATE FIH (CVI Drug-coated Balloon First in Human Trial), ILLUMENATE Global (Global Study of a Drug-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive SFA and/or Popliteal Lesions), Global-ISR (in-stent restenosis), and SAVER (Stellarex Vascular E-Registry) studies was 7.0% by Kaplan–Meier methodology. DCB indicates drug-coated balloon.

References

    1. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, Fleisher LA, Fowkes FG, Hamburg NM, Kinlay S, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e726–e779. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471.
    1. Wilson S, Gelfand D, Jimenez J, Gordon I. Comparison of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting with medical treatment for claudicants who have superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. Vascular. 2006;14:81–87. doi: 10.2310/6670.2006.00017.
    1. Jongsma H, Bekken JA, de Vries JP, Verhagen HJ, Fioole B. Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:1503–1514. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.084.
    1. Kayssi A, Al-Atassi T, Oreopoulos G, Roche-Nagle G, Tan KT, Rajan DK. Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016:CD011319.
    1. Stage TB, Bergmann TK, Kroetz DL. Clinical pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel monotherapy: an updated literature review. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:7–19. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0563-z.
    1. Schneider PA, Laird JR, Tepe G, Brodmann M, Zeller T, Scheinert D, Metzger C, Micari A, Sachar R, Jaff MR, et al. IN.PACT SFA Trial Investigators. Treatment effect of drug-coated balloons is durable to 3 years in the femoropopliteal arteries: long-term results of the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e005891. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005891.
    1. Brodmann M, Werner M, Meyer DR, Reimer P, Krüger K, Granada JF, Jaff MR, Schroeder H ILLUMENATE EU RCT Investigators. Sustainable antirestenosis effect with a low-dose drug-coated balloon: the ILLUMENATE European randomized clinical trial 2-year results. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2357–2364. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.034.
    1. Thieme M, Von Bilderling P, Paetzel C, Karnabatidis D, Perez Delgado J, Lichtenberg M Lutonix Global SFA Registry Investigators. The 24-month results of the Lutonix global SFA Registry: worldwide experience with Lutonix drug-coated balloon. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1682–1690. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.041.
    1. Krishnan P, Faries P, Niazi K, Jain A, Sachar R, Bachinsky WB, Cardenas J, Werner M, Brodmann M, Mustapha JA, et al. Stellarex drug-coated balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month outcomes from the randomized ILLUMENATE Pivotal and Pharmacokinetic studies. Circulation. 2017;136:1102–1113. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028893.
    1. Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, Rocha-Singh K, Mena-Hurtado C, Metzger DC, Brodmann M, Pilger E, Zeller T, Krishnan P, et al. LEVANT 2 Investigators. Trial of a paclitaxel-coated balloon for femoropopliteal artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:145–153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406235.
    1. Feldman DN, Armstrong EJ, Aronow HD, Gigliotti OS, Jaff MR, Klein AJ, Parikh SA, Prasad A, Rosenfield K, Shishehbor MH, et al. SCAI consensus guidelines for device selection in femoral-popliteal arterial interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:124–140. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27635.
    1. Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Kitrou P, Krokidis M, Karnabatidis D. Risk of death following application of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in the femoropopliteal artery of the leg: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
    1. Schroë H, Holden AH, Goueffic Y, Jansen SJ, Peeters P, Keirse K, Ito W, Vermassen F, Micari A, Blessing E, et al. Stellarex drug-coated balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal arterial disease-The ILLUMENATE Global Study: 12-month results from a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91:497–504. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27348.
    1. Schroeder H, Meyer DR, Lux B, Ruecker F, Martorana M, Duda S. Two-year results of a low-dose drug-coated balloon for revascularization of the femoropopliteal artery: outcomes from the ILLUMENATE first-in-human study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:278–286. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25900.
    1. Torii S, Jinnouchi H, Sakamoto A, Romero ME, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Finn AV. Comparison of biologic effect and particulate embolization after femoral artery treatment with three drug-coated balloons in healthy swine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.025.
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
    1. Teichgraber UK, Klumb C. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty in femoro- popliteal arteries - is there a class effect? Zentralbl Chir. 2017;142:470–480. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119895.
    1. Schroeder H, Werner M, Meyer DR, Reimer P, Krüger K, Jaff MR, Brodmann M ILLUMENATE EU RCT Investigators. Low-dose paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease: one-year results of the ILLUMENATE European randomized clinical trial (randomized trial of a novel paclitaxel-coated percutaneous angioplasty balloon). Circulation. 2017;135:2227–2236. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493.
    1. Picard F, Doucet S, Asgar AW. Contemporary use of drug-coated balloons in coronary artery disease: where are we now? Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;110:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.01.005.
    1. Camenzind E, Steg PG, Wijns W. Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation. 2007;115:1440–1455. discussion 1455. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666800.
    1. Moschovitis A, Schönenberger C, Zanchin C, Spitzer E, Yamaji K, Räber L, Billinger M, Stortecky S, Pilgrim T, Zanchin T, et al. Ten-year clinical outcomes of first-generation drug-eluting stents: the Sirolimus-Eluting vs. Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization (SIRTAX) VERY LATE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3386–3395.
    1. Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schömig A, Pfisterer ME, Stone GW, Leon MB, de Lezo JS, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370:937–948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61444-5.
    1. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, Colombo A, Schampaert E, Grube E, Kirtane AJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:998–1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067193.
    1. Creel CJ, Lovich MA, Edelman ER. Arterial paclitaxel distribution and deposition. Circ Res. 2000;86:879–884. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.8.879.
    1. Levin AD, Vukmirovic N, Hwang CW, Edelman ER. Specific binding to intracellular proteins determines arterial transport properties for rapamycin and paclitaxel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9463–9467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400918101.
    1. Axel DI, Kunert W, Göggelmann C, Oberhoff M, Herdeg C, Küttner A, Wild DH, Brehm BR, Riessen R, Köveker G, et al. Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery. Circulation. 1997;96:636–645. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.636.
    1. Bausback Y, Wittig T, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Bosiers M, Peeters P, Brucks S, Lottes AE, Scheinert D, Steiner S. Drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:667–679. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.039.
    1. Iida O, Soga Y, Urasawa K, Saito S, Jaff MR, Wang H, Ookubo H, Yokoi H MDT-2113 SFA Japan Investigators. Drug-coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2-year results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:664–672. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28048.
    1. Tepe G, Laird J, Schneider P, Brodmann M, Krishnan P, Micari A, Metzger C, Scheinert D, Zeller T, Cohen DJ, et al. IN.PACT SFA Trial Investigators. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circulation. 2015;131:495–502. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011004.
    1. Schneider PA, Laird JR, Doros G, Gao Q, Ansel G, Brodmann M, Micari A, Shishehbor MH, Tepe G, Zeller T. mortality not correlated with paclitaxel exposure: an independent patient-level meta-analysis of a drug-coated balloon. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2550–2563. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.013.
    1. Secemsky EA, Kundi H, Weinberg I, Jaff MR, Krawisz A, Parikh SA, Beckman JA, Mustapha J, Rosenfield K, Yeh RW. Association of survival with femoropopliteal artery revascularization with drug-coated devices. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:332–340. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0325.
    1. Secemsky EA, Kundi H, Weinberg I, Schermerhon M, Beckman JA, Parikh SA, Jaff MR, Mustapha J, Rosenfield K, Yeh RW. Drug-eluting stent implantation and long-term survival following peripheral artery revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2636–2638. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.020.
    1. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions SCAI statement on the association between paclitaxel devices and mortality.January 25, 2019. Accessed August 16, 2019
    1. Feldman DN, Armstrong EJ, Aronow HD, Gigliotti OS, Jaff MR, Klein AJ, Parikh SA, Prasad A, Rosenfield K, Shishehbor MH, et al. SCAI consensus guidelines for device selection in femoral-popliteal arterial interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:124–140. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27635.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe