A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Use of a Virtual Decisional Aid to Improve Knowledge and Patient Satisfaction in Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy

Lee Varelas, Francesco M Egro, Nicole Evankovich, Vu Nguyen, Lee Varelas, Francesco M Egro, Nicole Evankovich, Vu Nguyen

Abstract

Background The decisional process of navigating breast reconstruction surgery is very challenging for patients with a breast cancer diagnosis. This study aims to assess the impact of a virtual breast reconstruction decision aid program on the decision-making process of breast cancer patients considering breast reconstruction. Methods A two-arm, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh. Patients were blindly assigned to one of two arms: Emmi Decide (Emmi Solutions LLC, Chicago, IL) program prior to traditional consultation (intervention) and traditional consultation alone (control). All patients completed a baseline pre- and post-intervention questionnaire to evaluate knowledge, patient satisfaction, and psychological status. Surgeons' satisfaction and consultation time were also recorded. Results A total of 26 patients participated in the study (n=13 in each arm). Patients in the intervention group reported a greater BREAST-Q reconstruction module score (control=47.9±8.2, intervention=56.8±4.2, p=0.0017), lower decisional conflict scale score (control=30.2±11.8, intervention=14.5±8.8, p=0.017), and improved patient knowledge (control=70.8±15.5%, intervention=83.1±13.8%, p=0.018). No difference was noted in consultation time (control=51.0±7.8 min, intervention=47.8±13.7 min, p=0.46) and psychological testing (control=49.7±16.0, intervention=44.6±15.2, p=0.26). However, surgeons reported greater satisfaction with their consultations with interventional group participants (control=3.4±0.7, intervention=4.8±0.4, p=0.000056). Conclusions The use of a virtual decisional aid program to assist the decision-making of breast reconstruction patients was shown to significantly benefit both patients and surgeons, by improving patient knowledge and satisfaction without placing an additional psychological burden on them. This supports the notion that this resource is a promising tool that can improve the difficult process of breast reconstruction in the vulnerable population of breast cancer patients.

Keywords: breast cancer; breast reconstruction; decisional aid; mastectomy; patient knowledge; patient satisfaction; surgeon satisfaction; virtual decisional aid.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Copyright © 2020, Varelas et al.

Figures

Figure 1. Flowchart outlining a summary of…
Figure 1. Flowchart outlining a summary of the study’s methodology including the number of patients that were enrolled, randomized, and ultimately included in the study.

References

    1. Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breastcancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction. Fanakidou I, Zyga S, Alikari V, Tsironi M, Stathoulis J, Theofilou P. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:539–543.
    1. Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Chen W, Lv X, Xu X, Gao X, Wang B. Breast Cancer. 2018;25:464–469.
    1. Systematic review of shared decision-making in surgery. de Mik SML, Stubenrouch FE, Balm R, Ubbink DT. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1721–1730.
    1. The effect of web-based education on patient satisfaction, consultation time and conversion to surgery. Boudreault DJ, Li CS, Wong MS. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:108–110.
    1. Chinese women's preferences and concerns regarding incision location for breast augmentation surgery: a survey of 216 patients. Sun J, Liu C, Mu D, Wang K, Zhu S, He Y, Luan J. Aesth Plast Surg. 2015;39:214–226.
    1. A survey of patient comprehension of readily accessible online educational material regarding plastic surgery procedures. Hoppe IC, Ahuja NK, Ingargiola MJ, Granick MS. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:436–442.
    1. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:1365–1375.
    1. Reducing decisional conflict and enhancing satisfaction with information among women considering breast reconstruction following mastectomy: results from the BRECONDA randomized controlled trial. Sherman KA, Shaw LK, Winch CJ, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:592–602.
    1. Evaluating a decision aid for improving decision making in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Hawley ST, Newman L, Griggs JJ, Kosir MA, Katz SJ. Patient. 2016;9:161–169.
    1. Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Lam WW, Chan M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Fielding R. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2879–2885.
    1. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, Klassen A, Cano SJ, Browne J, Pusic AL. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–162.
    1. National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates. Frisell A, Lagergren J, de Boniface J. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1640–1648.
    1. Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher-risk women. Stacey D, O’Connor AM, DeGrasse C, Verma S. Health Expect. 2003;6:3–18.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe