Effect of blinding with a new pragmatic placebo needle: a randomized controlled crossover study

Baoyan Liu, Huanfang Xu, Rui Ma, Qian Mo, Shiyan Yan, Zhishun Liu, Baoyan Liu, Huanfang Xu, Rui Ma, Qian Mo, Shiyan Yan, Zhishun Liu

Abstract

Placebo control is a useful method for determining the efficacy of a therapy. In acupuncture researches, the preferred method for placebo control is acupuncture using a placebo needle that has a blunt tip and achieves no skin penetration. We performed a crossover study to validate the blinding effect of a new type of placebo needle. Sixty volunteers were randomized to receive acupuncture using 2 types of needles with different sequences: sequence AB, involving first the pragmatic placebo needle and then the real needle, and sequence BA, in a reverse order. Placebo acupuncture was performed by administering the placebo needle through an adhesive pad without skin penetration on the acupoints LI4, RN12, BL25, and BL36. Real acupuncture was performed by needling through the pad and penetrating the skin to 15 mm using a real needle on the same acupoints. The acupuncture was administered every other day with 3 sessions for 1 type of needle. The primary outcome was the perception of needle penetration. Besides degree of acupuncture pain, type, and degree of needle sensation, needle acceptability and factors influencing the subject blinding effect were assessed. Needle penetration was felt by 100%, 90% (54/60), 88.3% (53/60), and 95% (57/60) of volunteers receiving placebo acupuncture and 98.3% (59/60), 96.7% (58/60), 95% (57/60), and 95% (57/60) of volunteers receiving real acupuncture on LI4, RN12, BL25, and BL36, respectively. Differences of the volunteers' perception of needle penetration between the placebo needle and real needle were not significant for the 4 acupoints (all P > 0.05). Volunteers experienced fewer distension sensations (P = 0.01), a lower degree of needle sensation (P = 0.007), and less pain (P = 0.006) during placebo acupuncture than during real acupuncture. The placebo needle was more easily accepted than the real needle (OR = 1.63, 95% CI, 1.01-2.64). The influences of age, sex, educational level, acupuncture experience, needle sensation, acupuncture pain, and needle acceptability on volunteers' perception of needle penetration were not significant. The pragmatic placebo needle is a valid control for acupuncture research. It produces a good subject blinding effect with a similar appearance to conventional acupuncture needles and no skin penetration when applied.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Pragmatic placebo needle: 1, needle handle; 2, needle body; 3, adhesive pad; 4, blunt tip; 5, cutis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow diagram.

References

    1. Zhu D, Gao Y, Chang J, et al. Placebo acupuncture devices: considerations for acupuncture research. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013:628907.
    1. Olausson H, Wessberg J, Morrison I, et al. The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34:185–191.
    1. van der Kuy PH, Lohman JJ. A quantification of the placebo response in migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia 2002; 22:265–270.
    1. Linde K, Streng A, Jurgens S, et al. Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:2118–2125.
    1. Diener HC, Kronfeld K, Boewing G, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture for the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:310–316.
    1. Linde K, Niemann K, Meissner K. Are sham acupuncture interventions more effective than (other) placebos? A re-analysis of data from the Cochrane review on placebo effects. Forsch Komplementmed 2010; 17:259–264.
    1. Lund I, Lundeberg T. Are minimal, superficial or sham acupuncture procedures acceptable as inert placebo controls? Acupunct Med 2006; 24:13–15.
    1. Lundeberg T, Lund I, Sing A, et al. Is placebo acupuncture what it is intended to be? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011; 2011:932407.
    1. Streitberger K, Kleinhenz J. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research. Lancet 1998; 352:364–365.
    1. Park J, White A, Stevinson C, et al. Validating a new non-penetrating sham acupuncture device: two randomised controlled trials. Acupunct Med 2002; 20:168–174.
    1. Takakura N, Takayama M, Kawase A, et al. Tapping-in method (skin penetration technique) with a placebo needle for double-blind acupuncture trials. J Altern Complement Med 2013; 19:308–312.
    1. Tsukayama H, Yamashita H, Kimura T, et al. Factors that influence the applicability of sham needle in acupuncture trials: two randomized, single-blind, crossover trials with acupuncture-experienced subjects. Clin J Pain 2006; 22:346–349.
    1. Liu W, Qi S, Cheng P, et al. Preliminary investigation on clinical status of acupuncture in China. Chin J InfTCM 2008; 15:1–3.
    1. Hui KK, Nixon EE, Vangel MG, et al. Characterization of the “deqi” response in acupuncture. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007; 7:33.
    1. White P, Bishop F, Hardy H, et al. Southampton needle sensation questionnaire: development and validation of a measure to gauge acupuncture needle sensation. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14:373–379.
    1. III JFR. AB/BA crossover trials—binary outcome. J Modern Appl Stat Met 2006; 5:452–457.
    1. Skakun EN, Kling S. A comparison of several score cutting procedures and their effects on success rates. Annu Conf Res Med Educ 1980; 19:9–14.
    1. Shi GX, Yang XM, Liu CZ, et al. Factors contributing to therapeutic effects evaluated in acupuncture clinical trials. Trials 2012; 13:42.
    1. Goddard G, Shen Y, Steele B, et al. A controlled trial of placebo versus real acupuncture. J Pain 2005; 6:237–242.
    1. Enblom A, Johnsson A, Hammar M, et al. The nonpenetrating telescopic sham needle may blind patients with different characteristics and experiences when treated by several therapists. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011; 2011:185034.
    1. Liu B, Xu H, Guo S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of discomfort and acceptability of acupuncture among outpatients in Chinese acupuncture and moxibustion departments: a cross-sectional study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013:715480.
    1. Takakura N, Takayama M, Kawase A, et al. Double blinding with a new placebo needle: a further validation study. Acupunct Med 2010; 28:144–148.
    1. Sahai H, Khurshid A. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review. Stat Med 1996; 15:1–21.
    1. Bang H, Ni L, Davis CE. Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 2004; 25:143–156.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe