Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys

Marloes Bults, Desirée Jma Beaujean, Onno de Zwart, Gerjo Kok, Pepijn van Empelen, Jim E van Steenbergen, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Hélène Acm Voeten, Marloes Bults, Desirée Jma Beaujean, Onno de Zwart, Gerjo Kok, Pepijn van Empelen, Jim E van Steenbergen, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Hélène Acm Voeten

Abstract

Background: Research into risk perception and behavioural responses in case of emerging infectious diseases is still relatively new. The aim of this study was to examine perceptions and behaviours of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands.

Methods: Two cross-sectional and one follow-up online survey (survey 1, 30 April-4 May; survey 2, 15-19 June; survey 3, 11-20 August 2009). Adults aged 18 years and above participating in a representative Internet panel were invited (survey 1, n = 456; survey 2, n = 478; follow-up survey 3, n = 934). Main outcome measures were 1) time trends in risk perception, feelings of anxiety, and behavioural responses (survey 1-3) and 2) factors associated with taking preventive measures and strong intention to comply with government-advised preventive measures in the future (survey 3).

Results: Between May and August 2009, the level of knowledge regarding Influenza A (H1N1) increased, while perceived severity of the new flu, perceived self-efficacy, and intention to comply with preventive measures decreased. The perceived reliability of information from the government decreased from May to August (62% versus 45%). Feelings of anxiety decreased from May to June, and remained stable afterwards. From June to August 2009, perceived vulnerability increased and more respondents took preventive measures (14% versus 38%). Taking preventive measures was associated with no children in the household, high anxiety, high self-efficacy, more agreement with statements on avoidance, and paying much attention to media information regarding Influenza A (H1N1). Having a strong intention to comply with government-advised preventive measures in the future was associated with higher age, high perceived severity, high anxiety, high perceived efficacy of measures, high self-efficacy, and finding governmental information to be reliable.

Conclusions: Decreasing trends over time in perceived severity and anxiety are consistent with the reality: the clinical picture of influenza turned out to be mild in course of time. Although (inter)national health authorities initially overestimated the case fatality rate, the public stayed calm and remained to have a relatively high intention to comply with preventive measures.

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Daily Update 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. 2010.
    1. Rothberg MB, Haessler SD. Complications of seasonal and pandemic influenza. Critical Care Med. 2010;38:e91–7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c92eeb.
    1. Pandemic Influenza preparedness and response. A WHO guidance document. World Health Organization; 2009. ISBN 9789241547680.
    1. Introduction of a new human Influenza virus in the Netherlands - Operationeel deeldraaiboek 2. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control-RIVM, The Netherlands. 2009. [in Dutch]
    1. Control Influenza pandemic - Operationeel deeldraaiboek 3. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control-RIVM, The Netherlands. 2006. [in Dutch]
    1. Health Council of the Netherlands. Advisory letter Vaccination against pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) target groups and priorisation. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands 2009/12E;
    1. Tang CS, Wong C. Factors influencing the wearing of facemasks to prevent the severe acute respiratory syndrome among adult Chinese in Hong Kong. Preventive Medicine. 2004;39:1187–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.032.
    1. Lau JT, Yang X, Tsui H, Pang E, Kim JH. SARS preventive and risk behaviours of Hong Kong air travellers. Epidemiol Infect. 2004;132:727–36. doi: 10.1017/S0950268804002225.
    1. Bosman A, Mulder YM, de Leeuw JRJ, Meijer A, Du Ry van Beest Holle M, Kamst RA, van der Velden PG, Conyn-van Spaendonck MAE, Koopmans MPG, Ruijten MWMM. Avian flu epidemic: public health consequences. Risk factors, health, well-being, health care needs and preventive measures during the H7N7 avian flu outbreak in the Netherlands. Bilthoven: RIVM/Instituut voor Psychotrauma; 2004. Report No.: 630940001/2004.
    1. Holmes BJ. Communicating about emerging infectious disease: The importance of research. Health, Risk & Society. 2008;10:349–60.
    1. Vaughan E, Tinker T. Effective risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:S324–32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537.
    1. Taylor M, Raphael B, Barr M, Agho K, Stevens G, Jorm L. Public health measures during an anticipated influenza pandemic: Factors influencing willingness to comply. Risk Management and Health Care Policy. 2009;2:9–20. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S4810.
    1. Raude J, Setbon M. Lay perceptions of the pandemic influenza threat. Eur Journal Epidemiology. 2009;24:339–42. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9351-x.
    1. Barr M, Raphael B, Taylor M, Stevens G, Jorm L, Giffin M, Lujic S. Pandemic influenza in Australia: Using telephone surveys to measure perceptions of threat and willingness to comply. BMC Infect Diseases. 2008;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-117.
    1. Blendon RJ, Koonin LM, Benson JM, Cetron MS, Pollard WE, Mitchell EW, Weldon KJ, Herrmann MJ. Public response to community mitigation measures for pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Diseases. 2008;14:778–86. doi: 10.3201/eid1405.071437.
    1. Sadique MZ, Edmunds WJ, Smith RD, Meerding WJ, de Zwart O, Brug J, Beutels P. Precautionary behavior in response to perceived threat of pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Diseases. 2007;13:1307–13.
    1. Kristiansen IS, Halvorsen PA, Gyrd-Hansen D. Influenza pandemic: perception of risk and individual precautions in a general population. Cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-48.
    1. Kok G, Jonkers R, Gelissen R, Meertens R, Schaalma H, de Zwart O. Behavioral intentions in response to an influenza pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-174.
    1. Gelissen R, Vrolings E, Jonkers R. Expected behavioural responses in case of pandemic influenza. Results of a literature review and empirical research among the general public in the Netherland. Rescon, research & consultancy; 2008. in Dutch.
    1. Jones JH, Salanthé M. Early Assessment of Anxiety and Behavioral Response to Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A(H1N1) PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008032.
    1. Rubin GJ, Amlôt R, Page L, Wessely S. Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey. BMJ. 2009;339:b2651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2651.
    1. Seale H, Heywood AE, Mc Laws ML, Ward KF, Lowbridge CP, Van D, MacIntyre CR. Why do I need it? I am not at risk! Public perceptions towards the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-99.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Situation report - Influenza A (H1N1) infection. Update 1 May 2009.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Situation report - Influenza A (H1N1) infection. Update 5 May 2009.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Situation report - Influenza A (H1N1)v infection. Update 16 June 2009.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Situation report - Influenza A (H1N1)v infection. Update 20 June 2009.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Daily update - Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Update 12 August 2009.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Daily update - Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Update 21 August 2009.
    1. Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects. Manual for the review of medical research involving human subjects.
    1. Brug J, Aro AR, Oenema A, de Zwart O, Richardus JH, Bischop GD. SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1486–9.
    1. de Zwart O, Veldhuijzen IK, Elam G, Aro AR, Abraham T, Bishop GD, Richardus JH, Brug J. Avian influenza risk perception, Europe and Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:290–3. doi: 10.3201/eid1302.060303.
    1. Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER. In: Predicting health behaviour. Conner M, Norman P, editor. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 2005. Protection Motivation Theory; pp. 81–126.
    1. Champion VL, Skinner CS. In: Health behaviour and health education; theory, research, and practice. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editor. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2008. The Health Belief Model; pp. 45–65.
    1. Chapman GB, Coups EJ. Emotions and preventive health behavior: worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health psychology. 2006;25:82–90. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.82.
    1. Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL. Risk perception and their relation to risk behavior. Ann of behavioral medicine. 2004;27:125–30. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7.
    1. Fraser C, Donnelly CA, Cauchemez S, Hanage WP, van Kerkhove MD, Hollingsworth TD, Griffin J, Baggaley RF, Jenkins HE, Lyons EJ, Jombart T, Hinsley WR, Grassly NC. Pandemic potential of a strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early findings. Science. 2009;324:1557–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1176062.
    1. Hahné S, Donker T, Meijer A, Timen A, van Steenbergen J, Osterhaus A, van der Sande M, Koopmans M, Wallinga J, Coutinho R. the Dutch New Influenza A(H1N1)v Investigation Team. Epidemiology and control of influenza A(H1N1)v in the Netherlands: the first 115 cases. Euro Surveillance. 2009;14:19267.
    1. Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sport.
    1. Lau JTF, Yang X, Tsui H, Kim JH. Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:864–70. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.11.864.
    1. Leung GM, Ho LM, Chen SK, Ho SY, Bacon-Shone J, Choy RY, Hedley AJ, Lam TH, Fielding R. Longitudinal assessment of community psychobehavioral responses during and after the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1713–20. doi: 10.1086/429923.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe