A randomised feasibility study to investigate the impact of education and the addition of prompts on the sedentary behaviour of office workers

Catriona O'Dolan, Margaret Grant, Maggie Lawrence, Philippa Dall, Catriona O'Dolan, Margaret Grant, Maggie Lawrence, Philippa Dall

Abstract

Background: Office workers have been identified as being at risk of accumulating high amounts of sedentary time in prolonged events during work hours, which has been associated with increased risk of a number of long-term health conditions.There is some evidence that providing advice to stand at regular intervals during the working day, and using computer-based prompts, can reduce sedentary behaviour in office workers. However, evidence of effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability for these types of intervention is currently limited.

Methods: A 2-arm, parallel group, cluster-randomised feasibility trial to assess the acceptability of prompts to break up sedentary behaviour was conducted with office workers in a commercial bank (n = 21). Participants were assigned to an education only group (EG) or prompt and education group (PG). Both groups received education on reducing and breaking up sitting at work, and the PG also received hourly prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook over 10 weeks, reminding them to stand. Objective measurements of sedentary behaviour were made using activPAL monitors worn at three time points: baseline, in the last 2 weeks of the intervention period and 12 weeks after the intervention. Focus groups were conducted to explore the acceptability of the intervention and the motivations and barriers to changing sedentary behaviour.

Results: Randomly generated, customised prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook, with messages about breaking up sitting, proved to be a feasible and acceptable way of delivering prompts to office workers. Participants in both groups reduced their sitting, but changes were not maintained at follow-up. The education session seemed to increase outcome expectations of the benefits of changing sedentary behaviour and promote self-regulation of behaviour in some participants. However, low self-efficacy and a desire to conform to cultural norms were barriers to changing behaviour.

Conclusions: Prompts delivered by Microsoft Outlook were a feasible, low-cost way of prompting office workers to break up their sedentary behaviour, although further research is needed to determine whether this has an additional impact on sedentary behaviour, to education alone. The role of cultural norms, and promoting self-efficacy, should be considered in the design of future interventions.

Trial registration: This study was registered retrospectively as a clinical trial on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID no. NCT02609282) on 23 March 2015.

Keywords: Office; Prompts; Sedentary behaviour; Social cognitive theory; Workplace.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval was granted by Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health & Life Sciences Ethics Committee (reference HLS/Psy/A14/083). All participants signed consent to participate and for their anonymised data to be used in publication.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adapted CONSORT flow diagram illustrating participant retention [41]

References

    1. Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000.
    1. Proper KI, Singh AS, Mechelen VW, Chin A, MJM P. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(2):174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015.
    1. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004.
    1. LFM DR, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López JP, VKR M, Luiz Odo C. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620.
    1. Chastin SFM, Mandrichenko O, Helbostadt JL, Skelton DA. Associations between objectively-measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults, the NHANES study. Bone. 2014;64:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.009.
    1. Zhai L, Zhang Y, Zhang D. Sedentary behaviour and the risk of depression: a meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014;
    1. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population-health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–113. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
    1. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet P, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(4):661. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046.
    1. Parry S, Straker L, Gilson ND, Smith AJ. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers––a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957.
    1. Parry S, Straker L. The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:296. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-296.
    1. Healy GN, Lawler S, Thorp A, Neuhaus M, Robson E, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. An evidence review: full report. 2012;ISBN:978-1-921822-06-3.
    1. Smith L, Hamer M, Ucci M, Marmot A, Gardner B, Sawyer A, Wardle J, Fisher A. Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: the active buildings study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):9–9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-014-1338-1.
    1. Clemes SA, Patel R, Mahon C, Griffiths PL. Sitting time and step counts in office workers. Occup Med. 2014;64(3):188–192. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqt164.
    1. Miller R, Brown W. Steps and sitting in a working population. Int J Behav Med. 2004;11(4):219–224. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1104_5.
    1. Ryde GC, Brown HE, Peeters GMEE, Gilson ND, Brown WJ. Desk-based occupational sitting patterns: weight-related health outcomes. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(4):448–452. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.018.
    1. Ryan CG, Dall PM, Granat MH, Grant MP. Sitting patterns at work: objective measurement of adherence to current recommendations. Ergonomics. 2011;54(6):531–538. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.570458.
    1. Marshall S, Gyi D. Evidence of health risks from occupational sitting: where do we stand? Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(4):389–391. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.001.
    1. Buckley JP, Hedge A, Yates T, Copeland RJ, Loosemore M, Hamer M, Bradley G, Dunstan DW. The sedentary office: a growing case for change towards better health and productivity. Expert statement commissioned by Public Health England and the Active Working Community Interest Company. Br J Sports Med. 2015; Published online first: 1st June 2015
    1. Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Bhaumik S. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
    1. van Berkel J, Boot CRL, Proper KI, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ. Effectiveness of a worksite mindfulness-based multi-component intervention on lifestyle behaviors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):9–9. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-9.
    1. Verweij LM, Proper KI, Weel ANH, Hulshof CTJ, van Mechelen W. The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: results from an RCT. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(7):500–507. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377.
    1. Kirk A, Fitzsimons C, Murphy M, Mutrie N. Effect of a person centred consultation intervention to reduce the sedentary behaviour of working Scottish adults. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15, Supplement 1(0):S314.
    1. Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):293–297. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010.
    1. Pedersen SJ, Cooley PD, Mainsbridge C. An e-health intervention designed to increase workday energy expenditure by reducing prolonged occupational sitting habits. Work (Reading, Mass) 2014;49(2):289–295.
    1. Swartz AM, Rote AE, Welch WA, Maeda H, Hart TL, Cho YI, Strath SJ. Prompts to disrupt sitting time and increase physical activity at work, 2011-2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E73. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130318.
    1. Donath L, Faude O, Schefer Y, Roth R, Zahner L. Repetitive daily point of choice prompts and occupational sit-stand transfers, concentration and neuromuscular performance in office workers: an RCT. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(4):4340–4353. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404340.
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
    1. Cooley D, Pedersen S. A pilot study of increasing nonpurposeful movement breaks at work as a means of reducing prolonged sitting. J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:–128376.
    1. O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2006;30(1):1–43. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2006.11679054.
    1. Keller PA, Lehmann DR. Designing effective health communications: a meta-analysis. J Public Policy Market. 2008;27(2):117–130. doi: 10.1509/jppm.27.2.117.
    1. DeCoster JM, Smith ER. Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2000;4(2):108–131. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. MRC: developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2008.
    1. Biddle SJH. Fit or sit? Is there a psychology of sedentary behaviour? Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2011;7(2):5–10.
    1. Ajzen I. In: From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. pp. 11–39.
    1. Smith R, Biddle S. Attitudes and exercise adherence: test of the theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour. J Sports Sci. 1999;17(4):269–281. doi: 10.1080/026404199365993.
    1. Rhodes R, Dean R. Understanding physical inactivity: prediction of four sedentary leisure behaviors. Leis Sci. 2009;31(2):124–135. doi: 10.1080/01490400802685948.
    1. Prapavessis H, Gaston A, DeJesus S. The Theory of Planned Behavior as a model for understanding sedentary behavior. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;19:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.001.
    1. Conroy DE, Maher JP, Elavsky S, Hyde AL, Doerksen SE. Sedentary behavior as a daily process regulated by habits and intentions. Health Psychol. 2013;32(11):1149–1157. doi: 10.1037/a0031629.
    1. Maher JP, Conroy DE. Habit strength moderates the effects of daily action planning prompts on physical activity but not sedentary behavior. J Sport Exercise Psychol. 2015;37(1):97–107. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2014-0258.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control/Albert Bandura. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
    1. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016; 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
    1. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010; 10.1002/ejsp.674.
    1. Sellers C, Dall P, Grant M, Stansfield B. Validity and reliability of the activPAL3 for measuring posture and stepping in adults and young people. Gait Posture. 2016; 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.020.
    1. Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820ce174.
    1. Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(12):992–997. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Granat MH. Event-based analysis of free-living behaviour. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(11):1785–1800. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1785.
    1. World Health Organisation . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. WHO technical report series 894. 2000.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
    1. Sawilowsky S. New effect size rules of thumb. J Modern Appl Stat Methods. 2009;8(2):1538–9572. doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1257035100.
    1. Nutbeam D, Harris E, Wise M. Theory in a nutshell: a practical guide to health promotion theories/Don Nutbeam, Elizabeth Harris. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89–112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146.
    1. Stevens M, Lemmink KAPM, van Heuvelen MJG, de Jong J, Rispens P. Groningen Active Living Model (GALM): stimulating physical activity in sedentary older adults; validation of the behavioral change model. Prev Med. 2003;37(6):561–570. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.012.
    1. Bennie JA, Timperio AF, Crawford DA, Dunstan DW, Salmon JL. Associations between social ecological factors and self-reported short physical activity breaks during work hours among desk-based employees. Prev Med. 2011;53(1):44–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.05.015.
    1. Gilson ND, Burton NW, van Uffelen JGZ, Brown WJ. Occupational sitting time: employee’s perceptions of health risks and intervention strategies. Health Promot J Austr. 2011;22(1):38–43.
    1. Muir R, Quilter-Pinner H. Powerful people. Reinforcing the power of citizens and communities in health and care. 2015:1–56.
    1. Chandrasekar K. Workplace environment and its impact on organisational performance in public sector organisations. Int J Ent Comput Bus Syst. 2011;1:1.
    1. Haynes BP. The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity. J Facil Manag. 2007; 10.1108/14725960710775045.
    1. Stuifbergen AK, Seraphine A, Roberts G. An explanatory model of health promotion and quality of life in chronic disabling conditions. Nurs Res. 2000; 10.1097/00006199-200005000-00002.
    1. Boutron I, Guittet L, Estellat C, Moher D, Hróbjartsson A, Ravaud P. Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med. 2007;4(2):e61. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040061.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe