A prospective randomized double-blind trial of the efficacy of a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block on the 24h morphine consumption after posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery

M B Breebaart, D Van Aken, O De Fré, L Sermeus, N Kamerling, L de Jong, J Michielsen, E Roelant, V Saldien, B Versyck, M B Breebaart, D Van Aken, O De Fré, L Sermeus, N Kamerling, L de Jong, J Michielsen, E Roelant, V Saldien, B Versyck

Abstract

Background: Spine surgery is associated with considerable postoperative pain and can be challenging to treat. A loco-regional technique suitable for spine surgery should cover the dorsal root of the spinal nerves at the levels where surgery is performed. The erector spinae block is a loco-regional technique with promising results and was recently described at the thoracic level. There are no randomized trials of this technique on a lumbar level. This study tests the hypothesis that the 24-h postoperative morphine consumption is significantly lower in patients undergoing posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery with a lumbar erector spinae (LUMBES) block when compared with a sham block.

Methods: This prospective randomized double-blind multicenter study will randomly allocate 80 adult patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery during general anesthesia to one of two groups as follows: (1) bilateral erector spinae block (20 mL 0.25% levobupivacaine) or (2) bilateral sham block (20 mL NaCl 0.9%). Our primary endpoint is 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary endpoints include 72-h morphine consumption, intraoperative sufentanil dosage, postoperative pain scores at regular time intervals both at rest and during movement, time to first postoperative mobilization, and the Quality of Recovery 40 survey score.

Discussion: The LUMBES trial is a pragmatic clinical study that will provide evidence of whether a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block is effective in reducing 24-h postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing lumbar inter-body fusion surgery. If this hypothesis is confirmed, this finding could contribute to more widespread implementation of this technique.

Trial registration: Local ethics committee B300201837508, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03825198 . Registered on 31 Jan 2019.

Keywords: Erector spinae block; Lumbar inter-body fusion; Postoperative pain; Regional anesthesia.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Recommended content for the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments*

References

    1. Lai LT, Ortiz-Cardona JR, Bendo AA. Perioperative pain management in the neurosurgical patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30:347–367. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2012.05.004.
    1. Nielsen RV, Fomsgaard JS, Dahl JB, Mathiesen O. Insufficient pain management after spine surgery. Dan Med J. 2014;61:A4835.
    1. Benyahia NM, Verster A, Saldien V, Breebaart M, Sermeus L, Vercauteren M. Regional anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia techniques for spine surgery - a review. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;22:25–33.
    1. Zhou L, Schneck CD, Shao Z. The anatomy of dorsal ramus nerves and its implications in lower back pain. Neurosci Med. 2012;3:10. doi: 10.4236/nm.2012.32025.
    1. Miyakoshi N, Shimada Y, Kasukawa Y, Saito H, Kodama H, Itoi E. Total dorsal ramus block for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a preliminary study. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:270–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.07.006.
    1. Al-Alami A, Abou El Ezz A, Kassab F. Ultrasound Guided Dorsal Ramus Nerve Block for Reduction of Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Case Series Imaging Study. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2015;23:251–256.
    1. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:621–627. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
    1. Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019;53:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036.
    1. Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:161–169. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014.
    1. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:11–15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
    1. Dewinter G, Moens P, Fieuws S, Vanaudenaerde B, Van de Velde M, Rex S. Systemic lidocaine fails to improve postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative recovery and quality of life in patients undergoing posterior spinal arthrodesis. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:576–585. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex038.
    1. Sharma S, Balireddy RK, Vorenkamp KE, Durieux ME. Beyond opioid patient-controlled analgesia: a systematic review of analgesia after major spine surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:79–98. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182340869.
    1. Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018;50:65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033.
    1. Neal JM, Brull R, Horn JL, Liu SS, McCartney CJ, Perlas A, et al. The Second American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine Assessment of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Executive Summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:181–194. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000331.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe