Study protocol for "Healthy Hearts Northwest": a 2 × 2 randomized factorial trial to build quality improvement capacity in primary care

Michael L Parchman, Lyle J Fagnan, David A Dorr, Peggy Evans, Andrea J Cook, Robert B Penfold, Clarissa Hsu, Allen Cheadle, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Leah Tuzzio, Michael L Parchman, Lyle J Fagnan, David A Dorr, Peggy Evans, Andrea J Cook, Robert B Penfold, Clarissa Hsu, Allen Cheadle, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Leah Tuzzio

Abstract

Background: Little attention has been paid to quality improvement (QI) capacity within smaller primary care practices which comprise nearly half of all primary care settings. Strategies for external support to build such capacity include practice facilitation (PF), shared learning opportunities, and educational outreach. Although PF has proven effectiveness, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of combining these strategies. Here, we describe the protocol of the "Healthy Hearts Northwest" (H2N) study, a randomized trial designed to address these questions while improving risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Methods/design: The targeted enrollment is 250 smaller primary care practices across Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. The study is utilizing a two-by-two factorial design to assess four different combinations of practice support: PF alone, PF with educational outreach, PF with shared learning opportunities, or PF with both. A mixed methods approach is being used for evaluation and will include data from (1) baseline and follow-up practice and staff surveys; (2) baseline and quarterly clinical performance measurement from each practice on four cardiovascular risk factors: appropriate aspirin use, blood pressure control, lipid management and smoking cessation support; and (3) a quality improvement capacity assessment (QICA) survey used by external practice facilitators to guide improvement efforts.

Discussion: Results from this study will inform future large-scale practice improvement initiatives by providing comparisons of promising external practice support strategies and advance our understanding of how to build QI capacity in primary care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02839382.

Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases; Primary health care; Quality improvement.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Factorial study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Project timeline and data collection windows

References

    1. Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;229:1–8.
    1. Frieden TR, Berwick DM. The “Million Hearts” initiative—preventing heart attacks and strokes. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(13) doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1110421.
    1. Buchholz L. EvidenceNOW grants focus on heart disease care in small practices. JAMA. 2015;314(2):115.
    1. Liaw WR, Jetty A, Petterson SM, Peterson LE, Bazemore AW. Solo and small practices: a vital, diverse part of primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(1):8–15. doi: 10.1370/afm.1839.
    1. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, McDaniel RR. Small primary care practices face four hurdles—including a physician-centric mind-set—in becoming medical homes. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(11):2417–2422. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0974.
    1. Arar NH, Noel PH, Leykum L, Zeber JE, Romero R, Parchman ML. Implementing quality improvement in small, autonomous primary care practices: implications for the patient-centred medical home. Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(5):289–300.
    1. Taylor EF PD, Genevro J, et al. Creating capacity for improvement in primary care: the case for developing a quality improvement infrastructure. 2013.
    1. Kottke TE, Faith DA, Jordan CO, Pronk NP, Thomas RJ, Capewell S. The comparative effectiveness of heart disease prevention and treatment strategies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(1):82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.010.
    1. Nagykaldi Z, Mold JW, Robinson A, Niebauer L, Ford A. Practice facilitators and practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(5):506–510. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.506.
    1. Berta W, Cranley L, Dearing JW, Dogherty EJ, Squires JE, Estabrooks CA. Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory. Implement Sci. 2015;10:141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0.
    1. Baskerville NB, Liddy C, Hogg W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(1):63–74. doi: 10.1370/afm.1312.
    1. Parchman ML, Noel PH, Culler SD, et al. A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care: initial and sustained effects. Implement Sci. 2013;8:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-93.
    1. Lineker SC, Bell MJ, Boyle J, et al. Implementing arthritis clinical practice guidelines in primary care. Med Teach. 2009;31(3):230–237. doi: 10.1080/01421590802158377.
    1. O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4
    1. Pace WD, Fox CH, White T, Graham D, Schilling LM, West DR. The DARTNet Institute: seeking a sustainable support mechanism for electronic data enabled research networks. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2014;2(2):1063.
    1. Daniel DM, Wagner EH, Coleman K, et al. Assessing progress toward becoming a patient-centered medical home: an assessment tool for practice transformation. Health Serv Res. 2013;1879–1897.
    1. Coleman K, Phillips K, Van Borkulo N, et al. Unlocking the black box: supporting practices to become patient-centered medical homes. Med Care. 2014;52(11):S11–S17. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000190.
    1. Johnson KE, Coleman K, Phillips KE, et al. Development of a facilitation curriculum to support primary care transformation: the “coach medical home” curriculum. Med Care. 2014;52(11 Suppl 4):S26–S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000240.
    1. Sheridan SL, Crespo E. Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60.
    1. Muntner P, Colantonio LD, Cushman M, et al. Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations. JAMA. 2014;311(14):1406–1415. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2630.
    1. Solberg LI, Asche SE, Margolis KL, Whitebird RR. Measuring an organization’s ability to manage change: the change process capability questionnaire and its use for improving depression care. Am J Med Qual. 2008;23(3):193–200. doi: 10.1177/1062860608314942.
    1. Jaen CR, Crabtree BF, Palmer RF, et al. Methods for evaluating practice change toward a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(1):S9-20–S92.
    1. The percentage of patients with ischemic vascular disease who currently report taking aspirin and the percentage of patients with ischemic vascular disease who were counseled about the risks and benefits of aspirin. 2009; . Accessed 16 June 2016.
    1. Controlling high blood pressure: percentage of members 18 to 85 years of age who had a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) and whose BP was adequately controlled during the measurement year, based on age/condition-specific criteria. NQMC:010516 2015; . Accessed 16 June 2016.
    1. Preventive care and screening: percentage of patients 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use at least once during the two-year measurement period AND who received cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user. 2008; . Accessed 16 June 2016.
    1. Collaborative ACL. Policy Brief: New Quality Measure Shows Program Evolution November 2015; . Accessed 16 June 2016.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
    1. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effect in structural equation models. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1982.
    1. Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WAJG. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clinical Epi. 2007;60:1234–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006.
    1. Mold JW, Fox C, Wisniewski A, et al. Implementing asthma guidelines using practice facilitation and local learning collaboratives: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):233–240. doi: 10.1370/afm.1624.
    1. Norton WE, McCannon CJ, Schall MW, Mittman BS. A stakeholder-driven agenda for advancing the science and practice of scale-up and spread in health. Implement Sci. 2012;7:118. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-118.
    1. McCannon CJ, Berwick DM, Massoud MR. The science of large-scale change in global health. JAMA. 2007;298(16):1937–1939. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.16.1937.
    1. Mangione-Smith R, Schonlau M, Chan KS, et al. Measuring the effectiveness of a collaborative for quality improvement in pediatric asthma care: does implementing the chronic care model improve processes and outcomes of care? Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5(2):75–82. doi: 10.1367/A04-106R.1.
    1. Gustafson DH, Quanbeck AR, Robinson JM, et al. Which elements of improvement collaboratives are most effective? A cluster-randomized trial. Addiction. 2013;108(6):1145–1157. doi: 10.1111/add.12117.
    1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York: Free Press; 2003.
    1. Valente TW. Network interventions. Science. 2012;337(6090):49–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1217330.
    1. Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD, Marsden PV. Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):794–798. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0190-8.
    1. Simon SR, Majumdar SR, Prosser LA, et al. Group versus individual academic detailing to improve the use of antihypertensive medications in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Am J Med. 2005;118(5):521–528. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.023.
    1. Miller P, Mosley K. Physician reimbursement: from fee-for-service to MACRA, MIPS and APMs. J Med Pract Manage. 2016;31(5):266–269.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe