Effect of shoulder girdle strengthening on trunk alignment in patients with stroke

Amina Awad, Hussien Shaker, Wael Shendy, Manal Fahmy, Amina Awad, Hussien Shaker, Wael Shendy, Manal Fahmy

Abstract

[Purpose] This study investigated the effect of shoulder girdle strengthening, particularly the scapular muscles, on poststroke trunk alignment. [Subjects and Methods] The study involved 30 patients with residual hemiparesis following cerebrovascular stroke. Patient assessment included measuring shoulder muscle peak torque, scapular muscles peak force, spinal lateral deviation angle, and motor functional performance. Patients were randomly allocated either to the control group or the study group and received an 18-session strengthening program including active resisted exercises for shoulder abductors and external rotators in addition to trunk control exercises. The study group received additional strengthening exercises for the scapular muscles. [Results] The two groups showed significant improvement in strength of all shoulder and scapular muscles, with higher improvement in the study group. Similarly, the lateral spinal deviation angles significantly improved in both groups, with significantly higher improvement in the study group. Transfer activity, sitting balance, upper limb functions, and hand movements significantly improved in the two groups, with higher improvement in the latter two functions in the study group. [Conclusion] Strengthening of shoulder girdle muscles, particularly scapular muscles, can significantly contribute to improving the postural alignment of the trunk in patients with poststroke hemiparesis.

Keywords: Lateral trunk alignment; Scapular muscles strengthening; Stroke.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Measurement of the scapular and spinal angles. The Qa angle represents the scapular upward rotation angle on the affected side, while the Qb angle represents that on the non-affected side. The SI is a line passing through the two inferior scapular angles, while the PI is a line passing through the two PSISs. The ASI is a line drawn perpendicular to the SI line, while the API is a line drawn perpendicular to the PI line. The angle of intersection of the two perpendicular lines, the ASI and API, represents the spinal lateral deviation angle (S angle).

References

    1. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, 2008. Update At-a-Glance. . (Accessed Oct. 15, 2014)
    1. Kelly BM, Pangilinan PH, Jr, Rodriguez GM: The stroke rehabilitation paradigm. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2007, 18: 631–650, v.
    1. Schmidt H, Werner C, Bernhardt R, et al. : Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2007, 4: 2.
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC: Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy, 1999, 85: 377–391.
    1. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, et al. : The stroke data bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke, 1988, 19: 547–554.
    1. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, et al. : Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke, 1994, 25: 1181–1188.
    1. Ostwald SK, Snowdon DA, Rysavy DM, et al. : Manual dexterity as a correlate of dependency in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1989, 37: 963–969.
    1. Olsen TS: Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 1990, 21: 247–251.
    1. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, et al. : The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1983, 46: 521–524.
    1. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. : Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 75: 394–398.
    1. Song C: Effects of scapular stabilization exercise on function of paretic upper extremity of chronic stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 403–405.
    1. Kim HJ, Lee Y, Sohng KY: Effects of bilateral passive range of motion exercise on the function of upper extremities and activities of daily living in patients with acute stroke. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 149–156.
    1. Verheyden G, Ruesen C, Gorissen M, et al. : Postural alignment is altered in people with chronic stroke and related to motor and functional performance. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2014, 38: 239–245.
    1. Martin S, Kessler M: Neurological Interventions for Physical Therapy (eds), 2nd ed. Saunders Elsevier. 2007, pp 287–92.
    1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH: Motor control. Translating Research into clinical practice (eds), 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Part 2, 2007, pp 157–257.
    1. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. : Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke, 1999, 30: 2369–2375.
    1. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M: Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke, 2000, 31: 2984–2988.
    1. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, et al. : Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2002, 83: 286–290.
    1. Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, et al. : Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci, 1995, 130: 59–68.
    1. Ada L, Dorsch S, Canning CG: Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother, 2006, 52: 241–248.
    1. Cael C: Functional anatomy-Musculoskeletal anatomy, Kinesiology and palpation for manual therapy (ed). Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010, pp 75–117.
    1. Genthon N, Vuillerme N, Monnet JP, et al. : Biomechanical assessment of the sitting posture maintenance in patients with stroke. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22: 1024–1029.
    1. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. : A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85: 620–628.
    1. Badics E, Wittmann A, Rupp M, et al. : Systematic muscle building exercises in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 2002, 17: 211–214.
    1. Bourbonnais D, Bilodeau S, Lepage Y, et al. : Effect of force-feedback treatments in patients with chronic motor deficits after a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2002, 81: 890–897.
    1. Mottram SL: Dynamic stability of the scapula. Man Ther, 1997, 2: 123–131.
    1. Folland JP, Williams AG: The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med, 2007, 37: 145–168.
    1. Falvo MJ, Sirevaag EJ, Rohrbaugh JW, et al. : Resistance training induces supraspinal adaptations: evidence from movement-related cortical potentials. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2010, 109: 923–933.
    1. Escamilla RF, Yamashiro K, Paulos L, et al. : Shoulder muscle activity and function in common shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Sports Med, 2009, 39: 663–685.
    1. Voight ML, Thomson BC, Thomson S: The role of the scapula in the rehabilitation of shoulder injuries. J Athl Train, 2000, 35: 364–372.
    1. Choi SH, Lee BH: Clinical usefulness of shoulder stability exercises for middle-aged women. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1243–1246.
    1. Horsley I: Assessment of shoulders with pain of a non-traumatic origin. Phys Ther Sport, 2005, 6: 6–14.
    1. Alizadeh MH, Daneshmandi H, Shademan B, et al. : The effects of exercise training on scapula position of muscle activity measured by EMG. World J Sport Sci, 2009, 2: 48–52.
    1. Gomes BM, Nardoni GC, Lopes PG, et al. : The effect of global postural reeducation technique in a hemiparetic stroke patient. A Case Report. J ACTA FISIATR, 2006, 13: 103–186.
    1. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry M, et al. Gray’s Anatomy, 38th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, Section 6, 1995, pp 775–838.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe