Major Factors Affecting the Live Birth Rate After Frozen Embryo Transfer Among Young Women

Ye Pan, Guimin Hao, Qiumin Wang, Hong Liu, Ze Wang, Qi Jiang, Yuhua Shi, Zi-Jiang Chen, Ye Pan, Guimin Hao, Qiumin Wang, Hong Liu, Ze Wang, Qi Jiang, Yuhua Shi, Zi-Jiang Chen

Abstract

In recent years, the freeze-all strategy has been widely adopted and applied. However, with the exception of age, the factors that affect the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer are still unclear. Therefore, the identification and mitigation of factors that influence the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer is a good way to increase the "take-home-baby" rate of frozen embryo transfer. The objective of this study was to identify factors affecting the live birth rate after cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer in young ovulatory women. This was a secondary analysis from a previously published multicenter randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-14005406) that was originally designed to compare the live birth rate and perinatal complications after fresh embryo transfer to those after frozen embryo transfer among ovulatory women. This study was carried out using a portion of the data from the original randomized controlled trial, which included 917 young women who underwent cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer. The 16 clinical candidate variables potentially affecting the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer were analyzed. Univariable analysis and multivariable analysis were performed to assess the relationship between predictive factors and outcomes, with the aim of identifying independent predictors of live birth after frozen embryo transfer. In this study, the live birth rate was 53.0% (486/917). Three independent predictors were ultimately identified as the main factors affecting the live birth rate of ovulatory young women. Infertility duration [odds ratio (OR): 0.933, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.876-0.995, p = 0.033], endometrial thickness before frozen embryo transfer (OR: 3.375, 95% CI: 1.556-7.321 p = 0.002), and the number of embryos transferred (OR: 2.653, 95% CI:1.226-5,743, p = 0.013) were the major factors contributing to the live birth rate after cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer among young women. The cut-off point for infertility duration was 4.5 years, and the cut-off point for endometrial thickness was 0.89 cm. Infertility duration, endometrial thickness and number of embryos transferred might affect the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer among young women. This result could help inform clinical decisions and counseling to increase the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer among young women.

Keywords: duration of infertility; endometrial thickness; factors; frozen embryo transfer; live birth rate.

Copyright © 2020 Pan, Hao, Wang, Liu, Wang, Jiang, Shi and Chen.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for the predictive parameters of live birth rate in frozen embryo transfer. (A) ROC for duration of infertility as predictors of LBR in FET. (B) Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for endometrial thickness as predictors of LBR in FET.

References

    1. Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, Geber S. Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod. (2018) 22:253–60. 10.5935/1518-0557.20180049
    1. Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. (1983) 305:707–9. 10.1038/305707a0
    1. Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, et al. . Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:126–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334
    1. Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Huynh BG, Ha DT, Pham TD, et al. . IVF transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:137–47. 10.1056/NEJMoa1703768
    1. Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, et al. . Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2019) 393:1310–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32843-5
    1. Coates A, Kung A, Mounts E, Hesla J, Bankowski B, Barbieri E, et al. . Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. (2017) 107:723–30.e3. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022
    1. Tiitinen A, Hydén-Granskog C, Gissler M. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten. Hum Reprod. (2004) 19:2439–41. 10.1093/humrep/deh446
    1. Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Härkki P, Vuoristo P, Hyden-Granskog C. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. (2001) 16:1140–4. 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1140
    1. Chen HH, Huang CC, Cheng EH, Lee TH, Chien LF, Lee MS. Optimal timing of blastocyst vitrification after trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0185747. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185747
    1. Sills ES, McLoughlin LJ, Genton MG, Walsh DJ, Coull GD, Walsh AP. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and prophylactic human embryo cryopreservation: analysis of reproductive outcome following thawed embryo transfer. J Ovarian Res. (2008) 1:7. 10.1186/1757-2215-1-7
    1. Eftekhar M, Rahmani E, Pourmasumi S. Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer. Iran J Reprod Med. (2014) 12:513–8.
    1. Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. (2013) 28:2425–31. 10.1093/humrep/det251
    1. Karlström PO, Bergh T, Forsberg AS, Sandkvist U, Wikland M. Prognostic factors for the success rate of embryo freezing. Hum Reprod. (1997) 12:1263–6. 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1263
    1. Berin I, McLellan ST, Macklin EA, Toth TL, Wright DL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. (2011) 28:575–81. 10.1007/s10815-011-9551-7
    1. Wang JX, Yap YY, Matthews CD. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Hum Reprod. (2001) 16:2316–9. 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2316
    1. Farhi J, Ben-Haroush A, Sapir O, Fisch B, Ashkenazi J. High-quality embryos retain their implantation capability in overweight women. Reprod Biomed Online. (2010) 21:706–11. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.040
    1. Insogna IG, Lee MS, Reimers RM, Toth TL. Neutral effect of body mass index on implantation rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. (2017) 108:770–6.e1. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.024
    1. Zhang J, Liu H, Mao X, Chen Q, Fan Y, Xiao Y, et al. . Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in a freeze-all policy: an analysis of 22,043 first autologous frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in China. BMC Med. (2019) 17:114. 10.1186/s12916-019-1354-1
    1. Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod. (2011) 26:2532–40. 10.1093/humrep/der228
    1. Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med. (2011) 8:e1000386. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000386
    1. Bu Z, Wang K, Dai W, Sun Y. Endometrial thickness significantly affects clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. (2016) 32:524–8. 10.3109/09513590.2015.1136616
    1. El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khairy M, Sunkara K, Seed P, Khalaf Y, et al. . The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles. Fertil Steril. (2008) 89:832–9. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.031
    1. Yang W, Zhang T, Li Z, Ren X, Huang B, Zhu G, et al. . Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting clinical outcomes of frozen embryo transfer cycles with morphological good-quality blastocyst: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine. (2018) 97:e9577. 10.1097/MD.0000000000009577
    1. Zhang T, Li Z, Ren X, Huang B, Zhu G, Yang W, et al. . Endometrial thickness as a predictor of the reproductive outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study of 1512. IVF cycles with morphologically good-quality blastocyst. Medicine. (2018) 97:e9689. 10.1097/MD.0000000000009689
    1. Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, Moodie G, Brenner S. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. (2007) 24:119–23. 10.1007/s10815-006-9100-y
    1. Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Arichi A, Karasawa Y, et al. . Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reprod Med Biol. (2007) 6:53–7. 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2007.00165.x
    1. Guan Y, Fan H, Styer AK, Xiao Z, Li Z, Zhang J, et al. . A modified natural cycle results in higher live birth rate in vitrified-thawed embryo transfer for women with regular menstruation. Syst Biol Reprod Med. (2016) 62:335–42. 10.1080/19396368.2016.1199064
    1. Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Mäkinen S, Karro H, Roos A, Tuuri T. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. (2006) 21:2368–74. 10.1093/humrep/del151
    1. Ashrafi M, Jahangiri N, Hassani F, Akhoond MR, Madani T. The factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. (2011) 50:159–64. 10.1016/j.tjog.2011.01.037

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe