Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures

R W Poolman, J C Goslings, J B Lee, M Statius Muller, E P Steller, P A A Struijs, R W Poolman, J C Goslings, J B Lee, M Statius Muller, E P Steller, P A A Struijs

Abstract

Background: Subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone, meaning fractures just below the knuckle of the little finger, account for approximately 20% of all hand fractures. Currently, there is no consensus concerning the optimal management of these fractures. Traditionally, treatment consists of closed reduction and external splinting in a neutral position using plaster of Paris (POP), involving the metacarpal joint, the proximal interphalangeal joint and the carpo-metacarpal joint. An alternative treatment strategy is functional treatment using taping or bracing that does not restrict movement.

Objectives: To compare functional treatment with immobilization, and to compare different periods and types of immobilization, for the treatment of closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures in adults.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register (July 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004), OVID OldMEDLINE (1951 to 1965), OVID MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), OVID MEDLINE In-Process (July 2004), EMBASE (1988 to 2004, week 29), the Internet, and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied.

Selection criteria: All randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials which compare functional treatment with immobilization or different types of immobilization for closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors assessed abstracts of all studies identified by the initial search, identified studies meeting the selection criteria, independently assessed the quality of the trial reports, and extracted and analysed the data.

Main results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria including a total of 252 participants. Most studies were of poor quality. The primary outcome measure, function of the hand, was not used in any studies. There was no evidence that any of the treatment modalities was statistically significantly superior.

Authors' conclusions: No included studies reported our primary outcome measure of interest, validated hand function. There was heterogeneity between the studies, which were of limited quality and size. No single non-operative treatment regimen for fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal can be recommended as superior to another in result. Further research is definitely warranted.

Conflict of interest statement

Two authors, RW Poolman and M Statius Muller, were investigators for one included study (Statius Muller 2003). Investigators did not carry out quality assessment on their own study. No other conflicts are declared.