Effect of dried fruit on postprandial glycemia: a randomized acute-feeding trial

Effie Viguiliouk, Alexandra L Jenkins, Sonia Blanco Mejia, John L Sievenpiper, Cyril W C Kendall, Effie Viguiliouk, Alexandra L Jenkins, Sonia Blanco Mejia, John L Sievenpiper, Cyril W C Kendall

Abstract

Background/objectives: To investigate the effect of dried fruit in modifying postprandial glycemia, we assessed the ability of 4 dried fruits (dates, apricots, raisins, sultanas) to decrease postprandial glycemia through three mechanisms: a glycemic index (GI) effect, displacement effect, or 'catalytic' fructose effect.

Subjects/methods: We conducted an acute randomized, multiple-crossover trial in an outpatient setting in 10 healthy adults. Participants received 3 white bread control meals and 12 dried fruit test meals in random order. The test meals included each of 4 dried fruits (dates, apricots, raisins, sultanas) alone (GI effect), 4 of the dried fruits displacing half the available carbohydrate in white bread (displacement effect), or 4 of the dried fruits providing a small 'catalytic' dose (7.5 g) of fructose added to white bread ('catalytic' fructose effect). The protocol followed the ISO method for the determination of GI (ISO 26642:2010). The primary outcome was mean ± SEM GI (glucose scale) for ease of comparison across the three mechanisms.

Results: Ten healthy participants (7 men, 3 women; mean ± SD age and BMI: 39 ± 12 years and 25 ± 2 kg/m2) were recruited and completed the trial. All dried fruit had a GI below that of white bread (GI = 71); however, only dried apricots (GI = 42 ± 5), raisins (GI = 55 ± 5), and sultanas (51 ± 4) showed a significant GI effect (P < 0.05). When displacing half the available carbohydrate in white bread, all dried fruit lowered the GI; however, only dried apricots (GI = 57 ± 5) showed a significant displacement effect (P = 0.025). None of the dried fruits showed a beneficial 'catalytic' fructose effect.

Conclusions: In conclusion, dried fruits have a lower GI and reduce the glycemic response of white bread through displacement of half of the available carbohydrate. Longer-term randomized trials are needed to confirm whether dried fruit can contribute to sustainable improvements in glycemic control.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02960373.

Conflict of interest statement

A.L.J. is a part owner of Glycemic Index Laboratories. J.L.S. has received research support from the Canadian Institutes of health Research (CIHR), Diabetes Canada, PSI Foundation, Banting and Best Diabetes Centre (BBDC), Canadian Nutrition Society (CNS), American Society for Nutrition (ASN), INC International Nut and Dried Fruit Council Foundation, National Dried Fruit Trade Association, The Tate and Lyle Nutritional Research Fund at the University of Toronto, The Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Fund at the University of Toronto (a fund established by the Alberta Pulse Growers), and the Nutrition Trialists Fund at the University of Toronto (a fund established by the Calorie Control Council). He has received food donations to support randomized controlled trials from the Almond Board of California, California Walnut Commission, American Peanut Council, Barilla, Unilever, Unico/Primo, Loblaw Companies, Quaker (Pepsico), Kellogg Canada, and WhiteWave Foods. He has received travel support, speaker fees and/or honoraria from Diabetes Canada, Canadian Nutrition Society (CNS), Mott’s LLP, Dairy Farmers of Canada, Alberta Milk, FoodMinds LLC, Memac Ogilvy & Mather LLC, PepsiCo, The Ginger Network LLC, International Sweeteners Association, Nestlé, Pulse Canada, Canadian Society for Endocrinology and Metabolism (CSEM), GI Foundation, Barilla Centre for Food and Nutrition (BCFN), Abbott, Biofortis, California Walnut Commission, American Society for Nutrition (ASN), Loma Linda University, Dietitians of Canada, European Food Safety Authority, and Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. He has or has had ad hoc consulting arrangements with Winston & Strawn LLP, Perkins Coie LLP, Tate & Lyle, and Wirtschaftliche Vereinigung Zucker e.V. He is a member of the European Fruit Juice Association Scientific Expert Panel. He is on the Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committees of Diabetes Canada, European Association for the study of Diabetes (EASD), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), and Obesity Canada. He serves as an unpaid scientific advisor for the Food, Nutrition, and Safety Program (FNSP) and the Technical Committee on Carbohydrates of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) North America. He is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC), Executive Board Member of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD, and Director of the Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials foundation. His wife is an employee of Unilever Canada.. C.W.C.K. has received grant grants or research support from the Advanced Food Materials Network, Agriculture and Agri-Foods Canada (AAFC), Almond Board of California, American Pistachio Growers, Barilla, Calorie Control Council, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Canola Council of Canada, International Nut and Dried Fruit Council, International Tree Nut Council Research and Education Foundation, Loblaw Brands Ltd, Pulse Canada, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers and Unilever. He has received in-kind research support from the Almond Board of California, American Peanut Council, Barilla, California Walnut Commission, Kellogg Canada, Loblaw Companies, Quaker (Pepsico), Primo, Unico, Unilever, WhiteWave Foods. He has received travel support and/or honoraria from the American Peanut Council, American Pistachio Growers, Barilla, California Walnut Commission, Canola Council of Canada, General Mills, International Nut and Dried Fruit Council, International Pasta Organization, Loblaw Brands Ltd, Nutrition Foundation of Italy, Oldways Preservation Trust, Paramount Farms, Peanut Institute, Pulse Canada, Sabra Dipping Co., Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Sun-Maid, Tate & Lyle, Unilever and White Wave Foods. He has served on the scientific advisory board for the International Tree Nut Council, International Pasta Organization, McCormick Science Institute, Oldways Preservation Trust, Paramount Farms and Pulse Canada. He is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC), Executive Board Member of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), is on the Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee for Nutrition Therapy of the EASD and is a Director of the Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials foundation. No competing interests were declared by Effie Viguiliouk and Sonia Blanco Mejia. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow of participants diagram

References

    1. Jenkins DJ, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1981;34:362–366. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362.
    1. Kim Y, Hertzler SR, Byrne HK, Mattern CO. Raisins are a low to moderate glycemic index food with a correspondingly low insulin index. Nutr. Res. 2008;28:304–308. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.02.015.
    1. Esfahani A, Lam J, Kendall CW. Acute effects of raisin consumption on glucose and insulin reponses in healthy individuals. J. Nutr. Sci. 2014;3:e1. doi: 10.1017/jns.2013.33.
    1. Alkaabi JM, et al. Glycemic indices of five varieties of dates in healthy and diabetic subjects. Nutr. J. 2011;10:59. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-59.
    1. Miller JB, Pang E, Broomhead L. The glycaemic index of foods containing sugars: comparison of foods with naturally-occurring v. added sugars. Br. J. Nutr. 1995;73:613–623. doi: 10.1079/BJN19950063.
    1. Kanellos PT, et al. A study of glycemic response to Corinthian raisins in healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013;68:145–148. doi: 10.1007/s11130-013-0348-y.
    1. Zhu, R., et al. Postprandial glycaemic responses of dried fruit-containing meals in healthy adults: results from a randomised trial. Nutrients. 10, pii: E694 (2018).
    1. Anderson JW, Weiter KM, Christian AL, Ritchey MB, Bays HE. Raisins compared with other snack effects on glycemia and blood pressure: a randomized, controlled trial. Postgrad. Med. 2014;126:37–43. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.01.2723.
    1. Bays H, Weiter K, Anderson J. A randomized study of raisins versus alternative snacks on glycemic control and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Phys. Sportsmed. 2015;43:37–43. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2015.998410.
    1. Famuyiwa OO, et al. A comparison of acute glycemic and insulin-response to dates (Phoenix-Dactylifera) and oral dextrose in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Saudi. Med. J. 1992;13:397–402.
    1. Ahmed M, Al-Othaimeen A, De Vol E, Bold A. Comparative responses of plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide following ingestion of isocaloric glucose, a modified urban Saudi breakfast and dates in normal Saudi persons. Ann. Saudi. Med. 1991;11:414–417. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.1991.414.
    1. Kendall CW, Josse AR, Esfahani A, Jenkins DJ. The impact of pistachio intake alone or in combination with high-carbohydrate foods on post-prandial glycemia. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011;65:696–702. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.12.
    1. Josse AR, Kendall CW, Augustin LS, Ellis PR, Jenkins DJ. Almonds and postprandial glycemia—a dose-response study. Metabolism. 2007;56:400–404. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.10.024.
    1. Agius L, Peak M. Intracellular binding of glucokinase in hepatocytes and translocation by glucose, fructose and insulin. Biochem. J. 1993;296(Pt 3):785–796. doi: 10.1042/bj2960785.
    1. Van Schaftingen E, Detheux M, Veiga, da Cunha M. Short-term control of glucokinase activity: role of a regulatory protein. FASEB J. 1994;8:414–419. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.6.8168691.
    1. Detheux M, Vandercammen A, Van Schaftingen E. Effectors of the regulatory protein acting on liver glucokinase: a kinetic investigation. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991;200:553–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16218.x.
    1. Vandercammen A, Detheux M, Van Schaftingen E. Binding of sorbitol 6-phosphate and of fructose 1-phosphate to the regulatory protein of liver glucokinase. Biochem. J. 1992;286(Pt 1):253–256. doi: 10.1042/bj2860253.
    1. Petersen KF, Laurent D, Yu C, Cline GW, Shulman GI. Stimulating effects of low-dose fructose on insulin-stimulated hepatic glycogen synthesis in humans. Diabetes. 2001;50:1263–1268. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.6.1263.
    1. Hawkins M, et al. Fructose improves the ability of hyperglycemia per se to regulate glucose production in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51:606–614. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.3.606.
    1. Moore MC, Cherrington AD, Mann SL, Davis SN. Acute fructose administration decreases the glycemic response to an oral glucose tolerance test in normal adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:4515–4519.
    1. Heacock PM, Hertzler SR, Wolf BW. Fructose prefeeding reduces the glycemic response to a high-glycemic index, starchy food in humans. J. Nutr. 2002;132:2601–2604. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.9.2601.
    1. Moore MC, Davis SN, Mann SL, Cherrington AD. Acute fructose administration improves oral glucose tolerance in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1882–1887. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1882.
    1. Health Canada (2011). Eating Well With Canada’s Food Guide. . Accessed 30 October 2018.
    1. Ajala O, English P, Pinkney J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013;97:505–516. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.042457.
    1. Wang Q, Xia. W, Zhao Z, Zhang H. Effects comparison between low glycemic index diets and high glycemic index diets on HbA1c and fructosamine for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care. Diabetes. 2015;9:362–369.
    1. Silva FM, et al. Fiber intake and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 2013;71:790–801. doi: 10.1111/nure.12076.
    1. Chandalia M, et al. Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:1392–1398. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421903.
    1. Bhupathiraju SN, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from 3 large US cohorts and an updated meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;100:218–232. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.079533.
    1. Greenwood DC, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, carbohydrates, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:4166–4171. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0325.
    1. erAct C. Dietary fibre and incidence of type 2 diabetes in eight European countries: the EPIC-InterAct Study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetologia. 2015;58:1394–1408. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3585-9.
    1. SKAC Chang, Shahidi F. Review of dried fruits: phytochemicals, antioxidant efficacies, and health benefits. J. Funct. Foods. 2016;21:113–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.11.034.
    1. Kim Yoona, Keogh Jennifer, Clifton Peter. Polyphenols and Glycemic Control. Nutrients. 2016;8(1):17. doi: 10.3390/nu8010017.
    1. USDA (2016). USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. . Accessed 30 October 2018.
    1. Hernández-Alonso Pablo, Camacho-Barcia Lucía, Bulló Mònica, Salas-Salvadó Jordi. Nuts and Dried Fruits: An Update of Their Beneficial Effects on Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients. 2017;9(7):673. doi: 10.3390/nu9070673.
    1. Sievenpiper JLCL, et al. ‘Catalytic’ doses of fructose may benefit glycaemic control without harming cardiometabolic risk factors: a small meta-analysis of randomised controlled feeding trials. Br. J. Nutr. 2012;108:418–423. doi: 10.1017/S000711451200013X.
    1. Cozma AI, et al. Effect of fructose on glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1611–1620. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0073.
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry Diabetes Mellitus: Developing Drugs and Therapeutic Biologics for Treatment and Prevention (DRAFT GUIDANCE). 1–30 (U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 2008).
    1. International Nut and Dried Fruit Foundation (2017). Nuts and Dried Fruits Statistical Yearbook 2017/2018. . Accessed 30 October 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe