F railty-adjusted therapy i n T ransplant N on- E ligible patient s with newly diagno s ed Multiple Myeloma (FiTNEss (UK-MRA Myeloma XIV Trial)): a study protocol for a randomised phase III trial

Amy Beth Coulson, Kara-Louise Royle, Charlotte Pawlyn, David A Cairns, Anna Hockaday, Jennifer Bird, Stella Bowcock, Martin Kaiser, Ruth de Tute, Neil Rabin, Kevin Boyd, John Jones, Christopher Parrish, Hayley Gardner, David Meads, Bryony Dawkins, Catherine Olivier, Rowena Henderson, Phillip Best, Roger Owen, Matthew Jenner, Bhuvan Kishore, Mark Drayson, Graham Jackson, Gordon Cook, Amy Beth Coulson, Kara-Louise Royle, Charlotte Pawlyn, David A Cairns, Anna Hockaday, Jennifer Bird, Stella Bowcock, Martin Kaiser, Ruth de Tute, Neil Rabin, Kevin Boyd, John Jones, Christopher Parrish, Hayley Gardner, David Meads, Bryony Dawkins, Catherine Olivier, Rowena Henderson, Phillip Best, Roger Owen, Matthew Jenner, Bhuvan Kishore, Mark Drayson, Graham Jackson, Gordon Cook

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow cancer, which predominantly affects older people. The incidence is increasing in an ageing population.Over the last 10 years, patient outcomes have improved. However, this is less apparent in older, less fit patients, who are ineligible for stem cell transplant. Research is required in this patient group, taking into account frailty and aiming to improve: treatment tolerability, clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Methods and analysis: Frailty-adjusted therapy in Transplant Non-Eligible patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma is a national, phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing standard (reactive) and frailty-adjusted (adaptive) induction therapy delivery with ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD), and to compare maintenance lenalidomide to lenalidomide+ixazomib, in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not suitable for stem cell transplant. Overall, 740 participants will be registered into the trial to allow 720 and 478 to be randomised at induction and maintenance, respectively.All participants will receive IRD induction with the dosing strategy randomised (1:1) at trial entry. Patients randomised to the standard, reactive arm will commence at the full dose followed by toxicity dependent reactive modifications. Patients randomised to the adaptive arm will commence at a dose level determined by their International Myeloma Working Group frailty score. Following 12 cycles of induction treatment, participants alive and progression free will undergo a second (double-blind) randomisation on a 1:1 basis to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide+placebo versus lenalidomide+ixazomib until disease progression or intolerance.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from the North East-Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee (19/NE/0125) and capacity and capability confirmed by local research and development departments for each participating centre prior to opening to recruitment. Participants are required to provide written informed consent prior to trial registration. Trial results will be disseminated by conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN17973108, NCT03720041.

Keywords: CHEMOTHERAPY; Clinical trials; Myeloma.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ABC, K-LR, DAC, AH, CO, RH and PB report grants and non-financial support from BMS/Celgene, grants and non-financial support from Merck Sharpe & Dohme, grants and non-financial support from Amgen, grants and non-financial support from Takeda, during the conduct of the trial. DAC also reports travel support from Celgene Corporation. CPawlyn reports receiving honoraria and/or travel support from Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda. MK consultancy: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Seattle Genetics, Takeda; honoraria: BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Takeda; Research funding: BMS/Celgene; Travel/educational support: BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. SB reports receiving research funding from Takeda. KB—Advisory Boards Janssen: BMS/Celgene, Takeda, Novartis. Speaker Honoraria: Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda. Support to attend educational meetings: Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Takeda, GSK. GJ reports research funding from Takeda, Onyx, MSD & BMS/Celgene with consultancy from Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm, Pfizer, Roche & BMS/Celgene. GC reports research funding from Janssen, Takeda, Amgen & BMS/Celgene with consultancy from Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm, Pfizer, Roche & BMS/Celgene. MD reports Stock held in Abingdon Health. JB, RdT, NR, JJ, CParrish, HG, DM, BD, RO, MJ and BK have no declared competing interests.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival in MRC-IX and NCRI-XI TE pathway (A). Overall survival in MRC-IX and NCRI-XI TNE pathway (B). MRC-IX, Medical Research Council Myeloma IX trial (ISRCTN49407852); NCRI-XI, National Cancer Research Institute Myeloma XI Trial (ISRCTN68454111); TE, transplant eligible; TNE, transplant non-eligible.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reasons for ceasing induction treatment in NCRI-XI (n=928). NCRI-XI, National Cancer Research Institute Myeloma XI Trial (ISRCTN68454111).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow diagram of Myeloma XIV (Frailty-adjusted therapy in Transplant Non-Eligible patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma) Trial. ADL, activity of daily living; HE, health economics; IADL, instrumental activity of daily living; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; IRD, ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone; QoL, quality of life; R+I, lenalidomide+ixazomib.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of investigations (local and central). ADL, activity of daily living; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BP, blood pressure; CR, complete response; CRP, C-reactive protein; CTRU, Clinical Trial Research Unit; eCRFs, electronic case report forms; EDTA, edetic acid; EORTC QLQ C30, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of cancer quality of life questionaire; EQ-5D, Euroqol 5 dimensions; FBC, full blood count; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HMDS, Haematology Malignancy Diagnostic Service; IADL, instrumental activity of daily living; ICR, Institute of Cancer Research; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; IRD, ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LFTs, liver function test; LIMR, Leeds Institute of Medical Research; MRD, minimal residual disease; QLQ-MY20, myeloma quality of life questionaire; SAEs, serious adverse events; sCR, stringent complete response; SPMs, secondary primary malignancies; SUSARs, suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions; U&E's, urea and electrolytes. a. The FBC should be repeated mid-cycle 1 (Day 14 +/−3 days) or more frequently and during subsequent cycles if there is a concern about cytopenias, b. Pregnancy test must also be performed at 4 weeks after the end of study treatment, c. Or at 6 and 12 months post-R2 if treatment is stopped prior to this for reasons other than disease progression, d. Or at 2, 6 and 12 months post-R1 if treatment is stopped prior to this for reasons other than disease progression, e. The imaging at baseline/pre-registration is mandatory. Subsequent imaging will be as per local protocols/standard of care - imaging will only need to be repeated if extramedullary disease was detected at baseline, or in the event of new symptoms suggestive of new extramedullary disease, cord compression, new fracture, etc, or to investigate new hypercalcaemia. In the rare event of participants with extramedullary disease at baseline, imaging should be performed at the end of IRD induction to confirm the end of induction response, and at any other time the disease parameters suggest that the participant has achieved a complete response (if not already achieved at the end of induction) to confirm that the extramedullary disease has resolved, f. Performance status should be recorded at the same timepoints as the frailty index (ie, prior to R1, after cycles 2, 4, 6 and 12 of induction, and after cycles 6 and 12 of maintenance). Performance status should also be recorded at the time of disease progression. Or at 2, 6 and 12 months post-R1 if treatment is stopped prior to this for reasons other than disease progression, g. If the participant did not consent to the pre-trial bone marrow registration part of Myeloma XIV, the bone marrow biopsy will need to be taken after full informed consent. ¥If not sent at bone marrow and blood sample consent, *At pre-randomisation 1 a CD138 negative portion of the bone marrow aspirate will be sent to LIMR after CD138 positive selection at ICR, **At the end of induction bone marrow aspirate will be sent to ICR after CD138 positive selection at LIMR.

References

    1. Cancer Research UK . Myeloma Incidence Statistics [online], 2015. Available:
    1. Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, et al. . Long-Term follow-up of MRC myeloma IX trial: survival outcomes with bisphosphonate and thalidomide treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:6030–8. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3211
    1. Pawlyn C, Cairns D, Kaiser M, et al. . The relative importance of factors predicting outcome for myeloma patients at different ages: results from 3894 patients in the myeloma XI trial. Leukemia 2020;34:604–12. 10.1038/s41375-019-0595-5
    1. Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, et al. . Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2019;6:e616–29. 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30167-X
    1. Pawlyn C, Davies FE, Cairns DA, et al. . Quadruplet vs sequential triplet induction therapy approaches to maximise response for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible, myeloma patients. Blood 2015;126:189. 10.1182/blood.V126.23.189.189
    1. Jackson GH, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, et al. . Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (KRdc) as induction therapy for transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients (myeloma XI+): interim analysis of an open-label randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 2021;18:e1003454–e54. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003454
    1. Richardson PG, Baz R, Wang M, et al. . Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2014;124:1038–46. 10.1182/blood-2014-01-548826
    1. Offidani M, Corvatta L, Caraffa P, et al. . An evidence-based review of ixazomib citrate and its potential in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Onco Targets Ther 2014;7:1793–800. 10.2147/OTT.S49187
    1. Assouline SE, Chang J, Cheson BD, et al. . Phase 1 dose-escalation study of IV ixazomib, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Blood Cancer J 2014;4:e251–e51. 10.1038/bcj.2014.71
    1. Gupta N, Zhao Y, Hui A-M, et al. . Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015;79:789–800. 10.1111/bcp.12542
    1. Kumar SK, Berdeja JG, Niesvizky R, et al. . Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1503–12. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71125-8
    1. Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N. Ixazomib, an investigational oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd), significantly extends progression-free survival (pfs) for patients (PTS) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): the phase 3 Tourmaline-MM1 study (NCT01564537). Am Soc Hematology 2015.
    1. Facon T, Venner CP, Bahlis NJ, et al. . MM-347: Ixazomib plus Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (IRd) vs. Placebo-Rd for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant: the double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM2 trial. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia 2020;20:S307–8. 10.1016/S2152-2650(20)30955-1
    1. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos M-V, et al. . Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an international myeloma Working Group report. Blood 2015;125:2068–74. 10.1182/blood-2014-12-615187
    1. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. . Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914–9. 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969;9:179–86. 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
    1. Delforge M, Minuk L, Eisenmann J-C, et al. . Health-Related quality-of-life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the first trial: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide. Haematologica 2015;100:826–33. 10.3324/haematol.2014.120121
    1. Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, et al. . Lenalidomide is a highly effective maintenance therapy in myeloma patients of all ages; results of the phase III myeloma XI study. Blood 2016;128:1143–43. 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1143.1143
    1. Jackson G, Davies FE, Pawlyn C. Lenalidomide maintenance significantly improves outcomes compared to observation irrespective of cytogenetic risk: results of the myeloma XI trial. Blood 2017;130.
    1. Kumar S, Berdeja JG, Niesvizky R, et al. . Long-Term Ixazomib maintenance is Tolerable and improves depth of response following Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone induction in patients (PTS) with previously untreated multiple myeloma (Mm): phase 2 study results. Blood 2014;124:82. 10.1182/blood.V124.21.82.82
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Špička I, Quach H, et al. . Ixazomib as postinduction maintenance for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: the phase III TOURMALINE-MM4 trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:4030–41. 10.1200/JCO.20.02060
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) . Updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. The Lancet 2014;15.
    1. Rajkumar SV, Harousseau J-L, Durie B, et al. . Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International myeloma workshop consensus panel 1. Blood 2011;117:4691–5. 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487
    1. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. . International myeloma Working group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:e328–46. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6
    1. Pawlyn C, Davies FE, Cairns D. Continuous treatment with lenalidomide improves outcomes in newly diagnosed myeloma patients not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant: results of the myeloma XI trial. ASH 2017.
    1. Jackson GH, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, et al. . Optimising the value of immunomodulatory drugs during induction and maintenance in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from myeloma XI, a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Br J Haematol 2021;192:853-868. 10.1111/bjh.16945
    1. O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549–56. 10.2307/2530245

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe