Pouchitis and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

J L Lohmuller, J H Pemberton, R R Dozois, D Ilstrup, J van Heerden, J L Lohmuller, J H Pemberton, R R Dozois, D Ilstrup, J van Heerden

Abstract

Although the etiology of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is unknown, its manifestations resemble those of nonspecific inflammatory bowel disease, including, anecdotally, the apparent ability to evoke extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to determine in what manner pouchitis and EIMs were associated. The computerized records of 819 consecutive patients who underwent IPAA between January 1981 and December 1988 were reviewed. Eighty-five patients were excluded (because of incomplete follow-up, death, or permanent ileostomy). Follow-up of the remaining 734 patients was complete (mean, 41 months). The mean age was 32 years and the ratio of men to women was 1:1. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed for chronic ulcerative colitis in 91% of patients and for familial adenomatous polyposis in 9%. Pouchitis occurred in 31% of chronic ulcerative colitis patients and 6% of familial adenomatous polyposis patients (p less than 0.01). The mean time to first occurrence was 17 months. Pouchitis recurred in 61% of patients at risk. Patients with preoperative and postoperative EIMs had significantly higher rates of pouchitis than did patients without EIMs (39% preoperative EIMs versus 26% with no EIMs, p less than 0.001; 53% postoperative EIMs versus 25% with no EIMs, p less than 0.001). Of patients with pouchitis in whom EIMs resolved after IPAA but then recurred (n = 12), EIMs recurred when pouchitis occurred and abated when pouchitis was treated in seven patients. We concluded that pouchitis occurred frequently after IPAA and that patients with EIMs were at higher risk of developing pouchitis than were patients who never had EIMs. Furthermore some patients experienced a temporal relationship between flares of EIMs and pouchitis. These results imply that pouchitis may be a novel manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease persisting after operation.

References

    1. Conn Med. 1977 Aug;41(8):477-9
    1. Am J Surg. 1979 Dec;138(6):851-5
    1. Gut. 1981 Jun;22(6):462-8
    1. Gut. 1983 Mar;24(3):193-201
    1. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1983 Apr;5(2):149-53
    1. Ann Surg. 1984 Feb;199(2):151-7
    1. Ann Surg. 1985 Aug;202(2):145-52
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986 Mar;81(3):199-201
    1. Br J Surg. 1986 Nov;73(11):909-14
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Jan;30(1):25-8
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Feb;30(2):81-5
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;40(6):601-7
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Oct;165(4):309-16
    1. Ann Surg. 1987 Oct;206(4):504-13
    1. Br J Surg. 1988 Apr;75(4):321-4
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988 Jan;31(1):10-6
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988 Nov;3(4):226-8
    1. Gastroenterology. 1989 Mar;96(3):817-24
    1. Br J Surg. 1989 Jan;76(1):77-81
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Apr;32(4):275-81
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4(1):50-6
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Jul;32(7):600-8

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe