Immunogenicity and smoking-cessation outcomes for a novel nicotine immunotherapeutic

D K Hatsukami, D E Jorenby, D Gonzales, N A Rigotti, E D Glover, C A Oncken, D P Tashkin, V I Reus, R C Akhavain, R E F Fahim, P D Kessler, M Niknian, M W Kalnik, S I Rennard, D K Hatsukami, D E Jorenby, D Gonzales, N A Rigotti, E D Glover, C A Oncken, D P Tashkin, V I Reus, R C Akhavain, R E F Fahim, P D Kessler, M Niknian, M W Kalnik, S I Rennard

Abstract

NicVAX, a nicotine vaccine (3'AmNic-rEPA), has been clinically evaluated to determine whether higher antibody (Ab) concentrations are associated with higher smoking abstinence rates and whether dosages and frequency of administration are associated with increased Ab response. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial (N = 301 smokers) tested the results of 200- and 400-µg doses administered four or five times over a period of 6 months, as compared with placebo. 3'AmNic-rEPA recipients with the highest serum antinicotine Ab response (top 30% by area under the curve (AUC)) were significantly more likely than the placebo recipients (24.6% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.024, odds ratio (OR) = 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-6.37) to attain 8 weeks of continuous abstinence from weeks 19 through 26. The five-injection, 400-µg dose regimen elicited the greatest Ab response and resulted in significantly higher abstinence rates than placebo. This study demonstrates, as proof of concept, that 3'AmNic-rEPA elicits Abs to nicotine and is associated with higher continuous abstinence rates (CAR). Its further development as a treatment for nicotine dependence is therefore justified.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00318383 NCT00598325.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest/Disclosure

Ms. Akhavain, and Drs. Fahim, Kessler, Kalnik and Niknian are employees of Nabi Biopharmaceuticals and have received salary support, stock and options. All other authors were investigators on the clinical trial funded by NIDA and by Nabi Biopharmaceuticals and some served on an advisory panel. Other disclosures include the following: Dr. Douglas Jorenby has received research support from Pfizer. Dr. David Gonzales has received grant/research support from Pfizer, Addex Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis and GlaxoSmithKline; consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Evotech NeuroSciences; speakers fees from Pfizer; and owning five shares of Pfizer stock. Dr. Nancy Rigotti has received research grant support from Pfizer and is an unpaid consultant to Pfizer and Free & Clear. Dr. Elbert Glover has served as a speaker, consultant, grantee, provided advice or is on the advisory board/panel for Pfizer and served as a speaker for Nabi Biopharmaceuticals.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Arrows denote timing of vaccinations for Schedule 1 (Week 0, 6, 12 and 26) and Schedule 2 (Week 0, 4, 8, 16, and 26). Primary endpoint (percent of subjects abstinent Week 19–26) and secondary endpoint (percent of subjects abstinent Week 19–52 are shown. NV (3’AmNic-rEPA); PBS (Phosphate buffered saline); Alum (aluminum hydroxide adjuvant); TQD (Target quit date).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Subject disposition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
For the intent-to-treat population: (A) 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates for high antibody (top 30% AUC), low antibody (bottom 70% AUC) groups and placebo over the course of 52 weeks; (B) Percent abstinent for week 45–52 (8 week continuous abstinence) by AUC. AUC is displayed in 10th percentile point increments; (C) Time to 8-week of sustained abstinence prior to week 46 and continuous abstinence maintained through week 52, stratified by group with high antibody (top 30% AUC), low antibody (bottom 70% AUC) and placebo (dropouts censored at week 52).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Median number of cigarettes per day, (B) CO levels and (C) geometric mean cotinine levels among those subjects not abstaining from cigarettes across those subjects with high antibody (top 30% AUC), low antibody (bottom 70% AUC) and placebo. Time on the x-axis is adjusted to align the target quit date between Schedule 1 and Schedule 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Geometric mean antibody concentrations (µg/mL) by treatment group.

References

    1. Mackay J, Ericksen M, Shafey O. The Tobacco Atlas. 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2006.
    1. Hatsukami DK, Stead LF, Gupta PC. Tobacco addiction. Lancet. 2008;371:2027–2038.
    1. Fiore MC, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2008.
    1. Pentel PR, et al. A nicotine conjugate vaccine reduces nicotine distribution to brain and attenuates its behavioral and cardiovascular effects in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2000;65:191–198.
    1. Carrera MR, et al. Investigations using immunization to attenuate the psychoactive effects of nicotine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004;12:563–570.
    1. Cerny EH, et al. Preclinical development of a vaccine 'against smoking'. Onkologie. 2002;25:406–411.
    1. de Villiers SH, Lindblom N, Kalayanov G, Gordon S, Johansson AM, Svensson TH. Active immunization against nicotine alters the distribution of nicotine but not the metabolism to cotinine in the rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2004;370:299–304.
    1. LeSage MG, et al. Effects of a nicotine conjugate vaccine on the acquisition and maintenance of nicotine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2006;184:409–416.
    1. Malin DH, et al. Passive immunization against nicotine attenuates nicotine discrimination. Life Sci. 2002;70:2793–2798.
    1. Keyler DE, et al. Reduced nicotine distribution from mother to fetal brain in rats vaccinated against nicotine: time course and influence of nicotine dosing regimen. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005;69:1385–1395.
    1. Keyler DE, Hieda Y, St Peter J, Pentel PR. Altered disposition of repeated nicotine doses in rats immunized against nicotine. Nicotine Tob. Res. 1999;1:241–249.
    1. Hatsukami DK, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine in current smokers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005;78:456–467.
    1. Cornuz J, et al. A vaccine against nicotine for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2547.
    1. St. Clair Roberts J, Akers CCR, Vanhinsbergh L, McKenna KA, Wood DM, Jack L. Longitudinal safety and immunogenicity data of TA-NIC, a novel nicotine vaccine. Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco; Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco; 2003 February 19–22; New Orleans, LA. 2003.
    1. Hughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL, Swan GE. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2003;5:13–25.
    1. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Prevention of pertussis among adolescents: recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Pediatrics. 2006;117:965–978.
    1. Fiore MC, et al. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2000. Jun, Treating tobacco use and dependence. 2000.
    1. Heatherton TF, Koslowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström K-O. The Fagerström Test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br. J. Addict. 1991;86:1119–1127.
    1. Hughes JR, Hatsukami DK. The nicotine withdrawal syndrome: a brief review and update. International Journal of Smoking Cessation. 1992;1:21–26.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe