Health care costs of case management for frequent users of the emergency department: Hospital and insurance perspectives

Karine Moschetti, Katia Iglesias, Stéphanie Baggio, Venetia Velonaki, Olivier Hugli, Bernard Burnand, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen, Patrick Bodenmann, Karine Moschetti, Katia Iglesias, Stéphanie Baggio, Venetia Velonaki, Olivier Hugli, Bernard Burnand, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen, Patrick Bodenmann

Abstract

Background: In most emergency departments (EDs), few patients account for a relatively high number of ED visits. To improve the management of these patients, the university hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland, implemented an interdisciplinary case management (CM) intervention. This study examined whether the CM intervention-compared with standard care (SC) in the ED-reduced costs generated by frequent ED users, not only from the hospital perspective, but also from the third-party payer perspective, that is, from a broader perspective that takes into account the costs of health care services used outside the hospital offering the intervention.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 250 frequent ED users (>5 visits during the previous 12 months) were allocated to either the CM or the SC group and followed up for 12 months. Cost data were obtained from the hospital's analytical accounting system for the entire sample and from health insurance companies for a subgroup (n = 140). Descriptive statistics and multivariate regressions were used to make comparisons between groups and assess the contribution of patient characteristics to the main cost components.

Results: At the end of the 12-month follow-up, 115 patients were in the CM group and 115 in the SC group (20 had died). Despite differences in economic costs between patients in the CM intervention and the SC groups, our results do not show any statistically significant reduction in costs associated with the intervention, either for the hospital that housed the intervention or for the third-party payer. Frequent ED users were big users of health services provided by both the hospital and community-based services, with 40% of costs generated outside the hospital that housed the intervention. Higher age, Swiss citizenship, and having social difficulty increased costs significantly.

Conclusions: As the role of the CM team is to guide patients through the entire care process, the intervention location is not limited to the hospital but often extends into the community.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(1):42–8. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032 .
    1. Doupe MB, Palatnick W, Day S, Chateau D, Soodeen RA, Burchill C, et al. Frequent users of emergency departments: developing standard definitions and defining prominent risk factors. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(1):24–32. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.11.036 .
    1. Bieler G, Paroz S, Faouzi M, Trueb L, Vaucher P, Althaus F, et al. Social and medical vulnerability factors of emergency department frequent users in a universal health insurance system. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2012;19(1):63–8. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01246.x .
    1. Soril LJ, Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM. Reducing frequent visits to the emergency department: a systematic review of interventions. PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0123660 10.1371/journal.pone.0123660 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4395429.
    1. Moe J, Kirkland SW, Rawe E, Ospina MB, Vandermeer B, Campbell S, et al. Effectiveness of Interventions to Decrease Emergency Department Visits by Adult Frequent Users: A Systematic Review. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2017;24(1):40–52. 10.1111/acem.13060 .
    1. Stokes J, Panagioti M, Alam R, Checkland K, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P. Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS one. 2015;10(7).
    1. Joo JY, Huber DL. An integrative review of nurse-led community-based case management effectiveness. Int Nurs Rev. 2014;61(1):14–24. Epub 2013/11/14. 10.1111/inr.12068 .
    1. Joo JY, Liu MF. Case management effectiveness in reducing hospital use: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev. 2017;64(2):296–308. Epub 2016/11/20. 10.1111/inr.12335 .
    1. Huntley AL, Johnson R, King A, Morris RW, Purdy S. Does case management for patients with heart failure based in the community reduce unplanned hospital admissions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2016;6(5):e010933 Epub 2016/05/12. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010933 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4874181.
    1. Penzenstadler L, Machado A, Thorens G, Zullino D, Khazaal Y. Effect of Case Management Interventions for Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatr. 2017;8(51).
    1. Khanassov V, Vedel I, Pluye P. Barriers to implementation of case management for patients with dementia: a systematic mixed studies review. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(5):456–65. Epub 2014/10/30. 10.1370/afm.1677 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4157983.
    1. Tam-Tham H, Cepoiu-Martin M, Ronksley PE, Maxwell CJ, Hemmelgarn BR. Dementia case management and risk of long-term care placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(9):889–902. Epub 2012/11/29. 10.1002/gps.3906 .
    1. Shumway M, Boccellari A, O'Brien K, Okin RL. Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(2):155–64. 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.021 .
    1. Iglesias K, Baggio S, Moschetti K, Wasserfallen JB, Hugli O, Daeppen JB, et al. Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial. Quality of Life Research. 2017.
    1. Shah R, Chen C, O'Rourke S, Lee M, Mohanty SA, Abraham J. Evaluation of care management for the uninsured. Med Care. 2011;49(2):166–71. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182028e81 .
    1. Reinius P, Johansson M, Fjellner A, Werr J, Ohlen G, Edgren G. A telephone-based case-management intervention reduces healthcare utilization for frequent emergency department visitors. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013;20(5):327–34. 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328358bf5a .
    1. Murphy SM, Neven D. Cost-effective: emergency department care coordination with a regional hospital information system. J Emerg Med. 2014;47(2):223–31. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.073 .
    1. Pope D, Fernandes CM, Bouthillette F, Etherington J. Frequent users of the emergency department: a program to improve care and reduce visits. CMAJ. 2000;162(7):1017–20. Epub 2000/04/14. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1232308.
    1. Grover CA, Close RJ, Villarreal K, Goldman LM. Emergency department frequent user: pilot study of intensive case management to reduce visits and computed tomography. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11(4):336–43. Epub 2010/11/17. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2967685.
    1. Bodenmann P, Velonaki VS, Griffin JL, Baggio S, Iglesias K, Moschetti K, et al. Case Management may Reduce Emergency Department Frequent use in a Universal Health Coverage System: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. 10.1007/s11606-016-3789-9 .
    1. Stergiopoulos V, Gozdzik A, Cohen A, Guimond T, Hwang S, Kurdyak P. The effect of brief case management on emergency department use of frequent users in mental health: Findings of a randomized controlled trial. PLoSONE. 2017; 12(8).
    1. Okin RL, Boccellari A, Azocar F, Shumway M, O'Brien K, Gelb A, et al. The effects of clinical case management on hospital service use among ED frequent users. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18(5):603–8. 10.1053/ajem.2000.9292 .
    1. Crane S, Collins L, Hall J, Rochester D, Patch S. Reducing utilization by uninsured frequent users of the emergency department: combining case management and drop-in group medical appointments. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):184–91. 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110156 .
    1. De Pietro CC, P.; Sturny I.; Crivelli L.; Edwards-Garavoglia S.; Spranger A.; Wittenbecher F.; Quentin W. Switzerland: Health system review Health Systems in Transition, 2015; In: Policies TEOoHSa, editor.: WHO; 2015. p. 1–288.
    1. Federal Statistical Office OFS. Costs, financing. 2017.
    1. CHUV. Rapport annuel 2013, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois. 2013.
    1. Bodenmann P, Velonaki VS, Ruggeri O, Hugli O, Burnand B, Wasserfallen JB, et al. Case management for frequent users of the emergency department: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC health services research. 2014;14:264 10.1186/1472-6963-14-264 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4071797.
    1. Manning WJ, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? Journal of Health Economics 2001;20:461–94.
    1. Buntin M, Zaslavsky A. Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures. Journal of Health Economics. 2004;23:525–42. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005
    1. Manning WB, A.; Mullahy J. Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. Journal of Health Economics. 2005;24(465–488).
    1. Jones A, Lomas J, Rice N. Healthcare cost regressions: Going beyong the mean to estimate the full distribution. Health Econ. 2015.
    1. Basu A, Manning WG. Issues for the next generation of health care cost analyses. Med Care. 2009;47(7 Suppl 1):S109–14. Epub 2009/06/19. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c94a1 .
    1. Buntin MB, Zaslavsky AM. Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures. Journal of Health Economics. 2004;23:525–42. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005
    1. Basu A, Manning WG. Issues for the next generation of health care cost analyses. Medical Care. 2009;47(7):109–14. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c94a1 .
    1. Manning WJ, Basu A, Mullahy J. Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. Journal of Health Economics. 2005;24:465–88. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011
    1. Basu A, Arondekar BV, Rathouz PJ. Scale of interest versus scale of estimation: Comparing alternative estimators for the incremental costs of a comorbidity. Health Econ. 2006;15:1091–107. 10.1002/hec.1099
    1. Griffin JL, Yersin M, Baggio S, Iglesias K, Velonaki VS, Moschetti K, et al. Characteristics and predictors of mortality among frequent users of an Emergency Department in Switzerland. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016. 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000425 .
    1. Office fédéral de la santé publique OFSP. Statistique de l’assurance-maladie obligatoire 2013. 8/2015.
    1. Vinton DT, Capp R, Rooks SP, Abbott JT, Ginde AA. Frequent users of US emergency departments: characteristics and opportunities for intervention. Emerg Med J. 2014. 10.1136/emermed-2013-202407 .
    1. Peppe EMM, J. W.; Chang H.C.; Becker E.; DiJulio B. Characteristics of Frequent Emergency Department Users. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2007.
    1. Spillane LL, Lumb EW, Cobaugh DJ, Wilcox SR, Clark JS, Schneider SM. Frequent users of the emergency department: can we intervene? Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 1997;4(6):574–80. .
    1. Sandoval E, Smith S, Walter J, Schuman SA, Olson MP, Striefler R, et al. A comparison of frequent and infrequent visitors to an urban emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(2):115–21. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.042 .
    1. Dent A, Hunter G, Webster AP. The impact of frequent attenders on a UK emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010;17(6):332–6. 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328335623d .
    1. Ramasubbu B, Donnelly A, Moughty A. Profile of Frequent Attenders to a Dublin Inner City Emergency Department. Ir Med J. 2016;109(4):389 .
    1. Zweifel P, Felder S, Meiers M. Ageing of population and health care expenditure: a red herring? Health Econ. 1999;8(6):485–96. .
    1. Seshamani M, Gray A. Ageing and health-care expenditure: the red herring argument revisited. Health Econ. 2004;13(4):303–14. 10.1002/hec.826 .
    1. Stearns SC, Norton EC. Time to include time to death? The future of health care expenditure predictions. Health Econ. 2004;13(4):315–27. 10.1002/hec.831 .
    1. Howdon DR, N. Health Care Expenditures, Age, Proximity to Death and Morbidity: Implications for an Ageing Population. In: Centre for Health Economics, UK, editor. CHE Research Paper 107. Working Paper ed2015.
    1. Kumar GS, Klein R. Effectiveness of case management strategies in reducing emergency department visits in frequent user patient populations: a systematic review. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(3):717–29. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.035 .

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe